Case law

Central Railroad v. N. J. West Line Railroad

32 N.J. Eq. 67 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1880

North Bank v. Brown, 50 Me. 214 ; also, Baxley v. Linah, 16 Pa. St. 241; Paine v. Schenectady Ins. Co., 11 R. I. 411. … Pl. § 736 ; Way v. Bragaw, 1 C. E. Gr. 213; Conover’s Ex’r v. Conover, Sax. 403 ; McEwan v. Broadhead, 3 Stock. 129 ; Moore v. Grubbs, 3 B. Mon. (Ky.) 77 ; Brown v. Wallace, 2 Bland 585 , 601.

Trall v. Trall

32 N.J. Eq. 231 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1880

He wanted to' board with their son, and she wanted to keep house, and* because he would not submit to her will in this respect, she left him. … Bowlby v. Bowlby, 10 C. E. Gr. 406; S. C. on appeal, 10 C. E. Gr. 570; Taylor v. Taylor, 1 Stew. 207 ; Cornish v. Cornish, 8 C. E. Gr. 208.

Security Trust Co. v. Lovett

78 N.J. Eq. 445 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 4, 1911

Leaming, V. C. … Brown v. Lippincott, 49 N. J. Eq. (4 Dick.) 44; Fischer v. Fischer, 75 N. J. Eq. (5 Buch.) 74.

Danielly v. Danielly

93 N.J. Eq. 556 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 18, 1922

In our state the divorce act expressly provides that a divorce from bed and board may be decreed for extreme cruelty in either of the parties. P. L. 1907 p. 474 § 2. In Csanyi v. Csanyi, 93 N. J. … Cook v. Cook, 32 N. J. Eq. 475. See, also, Crane v. Crane, 62 N. J. Eq. 21, 26; Rogers v. Rogers, 81 N. J. Eq. 479, 484.

Henderson v. Stokes

42 N.J. Eq. 586 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1887

I submit a few of the cases in our own reports: Graham v. Berryman, 4 C. E. Gr. 29; Paulison v. Van Iderstine, 1 Stew. Eq. 306 ; Rowley v. Flannelly, 3 Stew. Eq. 612; Ramsey v. Smith, 5 Stew. Eq. 28; Doniol v. … Eq. 30; Cummins v. Bulgin, 10 Stew. Eq. 476.

Wunderlich v. Bleyle

96 N.J. Eq. 135 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 9, 1924

Hewitt v. Green, 77 N.J. Eq. 345 , 355 ; Burrwell v. Mandeville's Ex'r ( 1844 ), 2 How. 560 ; Hardacre v. Nash, 5 T.R. 716; 101 Eng. Reprint 398; Hope, ex dem. Brown v. Taylor, 1 Burr. 269; 97 Eng. … Reprint 308; Aitken v. Sharp, 93 N.J. Eq. 336 , 346 . Counsel for complainant says that testator had a definite scheme for disposing of his estate.

Frey v. Nielson

99 N.J. Eq. 135 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 26, 1926

On this question see notes contained in Lawyers' Reports Annotated to Irving v. Ford, 65 L.R.A. 177 ; to Brown v. Finley, 21 L.R.A. ( N.S. ) 679 , and to Anderson v. French ( 1916A. ), L.R.A. 666. The cases of Ross v. … Ross (cited in Dayton v. Adkisson, supra ) and Miller v. Miller, 91 N.Y. 315 , rest squarely upon the application of the rule of comity.

Semon v. Terhune

40 N.J. Eq. 364 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1885

. — Held, that the record of the mortgage was not notice of the unrecorded deed ; also, Pierce v. Taylor, Id. 846; Brown- v. … Ch. 125 ; Jumel v. Jumel, 7 Paige 591 ; Russell v. Allen, 10 Paige 249 .

St. John the Baptist, C., Church v. Gengor

118 N.J. Eq. 467 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 26, 1935

Stuart v. Palmer, 74 N.Y. 183 ; Gilman v. Tucker, 128 N.Y. 190 . … And in Addoms v.

Gaston v. Ford

99 N.J. Eq. 592 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 18, 1926

Kent v. Armstrong, 6 N.J. Eq. 637 ; Cantine v. Brown, 46 N.J. Law 599 ; Kellers v. Kellers, 79 N.J. Eq. 412 ; S.C., on appeal, 80 N.J. Eq. 441 . … Dutch Church v. Smock, supra; Downey v. Borden, supra; Benz v. Fabian, supra; Tuerk v. Schueler, supra; *Page 597 McCloskey v. Thorpe, supra; Huston v. Boyd, supra; Hyde v. Hyde, supra , and Boohm v.

Boulton v. Administrators of Scott

3 N.J. Eq. 231 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 15, 1835

Vide Barnesley v. Powell, 1 Vesey, 289. Awards, if fraudulently obtained, may be set aside in equity: Brown v. *237 Brown, 1 Vernon, 157, and the cases there cited, (Raithby’s «edition.) … Argum. v. 2, 392 ; McKenzie v. Stewart, Dom. Proc. 1754 ; Cruise Dig. Tit. 33; Private Act, 50, 51.

Lora Lee Dress Co. v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Local No. 85

127 N.J. Eq. 564 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 5, 1940

Eq. 131; Elkind & Sons, Inc., v. Retail Clerks International Protective Association, 114 N. J. Eq. 586; Bayonne Textile Corp. v. American Federation of Silk Workers, 116 N. J. Eq. 146, 161; International Ticket Co. v. … Feller v. Local 144, &c., 121 N. J. Eq. 452.

Tichenor v. Dodd

3 N.J. Eq. 454 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1844

In Tweddell v. Tweddell, 2 Brown's C. … In Stevenson and Woodruff v. Black, Saxton 342, the principal of the case of Waring v. Ward and Tweddell v.

Hunt v. Hunt

10 N.J. Misc. 675 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 9, 1932

American Association, Ltd., v . Innis (Ky.), 60 S. W. Rep. 388 . In Woodward v. Woodward, 41 N. J. Eq. 224; 4 Atl. … Rep. 373 ; Gluck v. Rynda Development Co., 99 N. J. Eq. 788; 134 Atl. Rep. 363 , and Pfender v. Pfender, 104 N. J. Eq. 107; 144 Atl.

Koch v. Koch

79 N.J. Eq. 24 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 15, 1911

For purpose's of divorce, either absolute or from -bed and board, jurisdiction may be acquired by personal service of process upon the defendant within this state, under the following- conditions: *26 “(a) When, at the time … The remaining sections of the act, with the exception of section 33, relate to “Procedure and Practice,” subdivision IV., sections 9-24; “Alimony and Maintenance,” subdivision V., sections 25-j21'; “Miscellaneous Provisions

Town of Kearny v. New Jersey Suburban Water Co.

10 N.J. Misc. 1015 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 2, 1932

from the East Jersey Water Company (now Passaic Consolidated Water Company) at $56.25 and they furnished it to Kearny and adjoining municipalities at $82.50 per million gallons; that in March, as of January 1st, 1923, the board … The question of interest on the balance found by the master to be due the water companies was settled in an earlier opinion (Kearny v. New Jersey Suburban Water Co., 110 N. J. Eq. 214; 159 Atl. Rep. 520 ).

Weller v. Jersey City, Hoboken & Paterson Street Railway Co.

66 N.J. Eq. 11 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 12, 1904

Jones on Liens 140, 149; Terney v. Wilson, 16 Vr. 282 ; Phillips v. Mackay, 25 Vr. 319 ; Barnes v. Taylor, 3 Stew. Eq. 467; Middlesex Freeholders v. State Bank, 11 Stew. Eq. 36. … Ten Eyck v. Runk, 2 Vr. 428 ; Hayden v. Vreeland, 8 Vr. 372 ; Noice, Admr., v. Brown, 10 Vr. 569; Tichenor v. Hayes, 12 Vr. 193 .

Dodson v. Sevars

52 N.J. Eq. 611 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1894

Leg. 316; Lynde v. Estabrook, 7 Allen 68 , 72; Hunter v. Green, 22 Ala. 329 ; Weeks v. Jewett, 45 N. H. 540; Executors of Howe v. White, 1 C. E. Gr. 411, 416. … Jur. § 546; Frey v. Demarest, 1 C. E. Gr. 236, 239; Kennedy v. Cresswell, 101 U. S. 641 ; 2 Wms. Ex. 1718, 1719; Thompson v. Brown, 4, Johns. Ch. 619, 631.

Presbyterian Church v. Plainfield Trust

139 N.J. Eq. 501 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 5, 1947

Brown *Page 505 v. Fidelity Union Trust Co., 128 N.J. Eq. 197 ; 15 Atl. Rep. 2d 788. The answers of Mr. Fisher and of the executors-trustees collectively project three cardinal points entirely legalistic in character. … Hallett ( 1784 ), 1 Cox 134; Torrey Gilbert v. The Bank of Orleans Clark ( N.Y., 1842 ), 9 Paige 649 ; affirmed, 7 Hill 260 ; Terwilliger v. Brown, 44 N.Y. 237 ; De Vaughn v. Griffith, 149 Ga. 697 ; 101 S.E.

Harrington Co. v. Kadrey

105 N.J. Eq. 389 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 5, 1929

In Isserman v. … See, also, Ohio and Mississippi Railway Co. v. McCarthy, 96 U.S. 258 ; 24 L.Ed. 693 ; Cowdery v. Greenlee, 126 Ga. 786 ; 8 L.R.A. ( N.S. ) 137; Gibson v. Brown, 214 Ill. 330 ; 73 N.E. Rep. 579 (at p. 582 ).