Case law

Porch v. Agnew Co.

70 N.J. Eq. 328 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 22, 1905

Grey, V. C. … L. 1896 p. 298; National Bank v. Sprague, 21 N. J. Eq. (6 C. E. Gr.) 580; Skirm v. Eastern Rubber Co., 57 N. J. Eq. (12 Dick.) 179.

Doremus v. Mayor of Paterson

69 N.J. Eq. 188 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 26, 1904

Stevens, V. C. The defendant demurs to the amended bill. The ease stands thus. In Simmons v. Paterson, 60 N. J. … Its powers are vested in a board of commissioners. In the second place, it is not, in terms, mandatory.

Slutzker v. Rieber

132 N.J. Eq. 406 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 19, 1942

Brown v. Vandyke, 8 N.J. Eq. 795 ; Gifford v. New Jersey Railroad and Transportation Co., 10 N.J. Eq. 171 ; Elkins v. Camden and Atlantic Railroad Co., 36 N.J. Eq. 5 , 15 ; Ellerman v. … Rep. 287 ; Laurel Springs Land Co. v. Fougeray, 50 N.J. Eq. 756 ; 26 Atl. Rep. 886 ; Willoughby v. Chicago Junction Railways, c., Co., 50 N.J. Eq. 656 ; 25 Atl. Rep. 277 ; Wilson v. American Palace Car Co., 64 N.J.

Ditmars v. Camden Trust Co.

131 N.J. Eq. 85 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 5, 1942

Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co., * 128 N.J. Eq. 197 ; 15 Atl. Rep. 2d 788; Filley v. VanDyke, supra; Bird v. Hawkins, 58 N.J. Eq. 229 ; 42 Atl. Rep. 588 ; Ratzer v. Ratzer, 29 N.J. Eq. 162 ; Duke v. Duke, 70 N.J. … In Ashby v.

Township of Ewing v. Trenton

137 N.J. Eq. 109 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 5, 1945

In Empire Trust Co. v. Board of Commerce, c., 124 N.J. Law 406 ; 11 Atl. Rep. 2d 752 , Mr. … Kronson v. Lipschitz, 68 N.J. Eq. 367 ; 60 Atl. Rep. 819 ; La Rosa v. Nichols, 92 N.J. Law 375 ; 105 Atl. Rep. 201 ; Briscoe v. O'Connor, 119 N.J. Eq. 378 ; 182 Atl. Rep. 855 ; New Jersey Suburban Water Co. v.

Middlesex Transportation Co. v. Pennsylvania Railroad

82 N.J. Eq. 550 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 4, 1913

High Inj. (4th ed.) § 762; Hinchman v. Paterson Horse Railroad co., 17 N. J. Eq. (2 C. E. Gr.) 75; *557 Allen v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, 13 N. J. Eq. (2 Beas.) 68; Zabriskie v. … Eq. (2 Beas.) 31b; Humphreys v. Eastlack, 63 N. J. Eq. (18 Dick.) 136. (6) The complainant lias a complete and adequate remedy at law. Eecourse may be had to the board of public utility commissioners (P.

Carling v. Carling

78 N.J. Eq. 42 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 13, 1910

In Magowan v. Magowan, 57 N. J. … He says that on his arrival in Sioux City he made application to the president of the state board, who allowed him to practice until he could pass that board, which he never took the trouble to do.

County of Union v. Hopkins

95 N.J. Eq. 444 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 3, 1924

Furman v. Parke, 21 N. J. Law 310; and see §4 Oye. USO. … So that both on principle, and under the express decision in Furman v. Pandee, supra, this is a deficiency in the proofs which is fatal to the claims of all the interpleaders. Cf. also Codding v.

The Workmen's Circle v. Worman

108 N.J. Eq. 517 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 17, 1931

The constitution provides that the national executive committee of the parent organization shall have the power to dissolve a branch and that within a certain time an appeal may be taken to the national board of directors … In support of this contention defendants have cited the case of Grand Court, Foresters of America, c. , v. Court Cavour, c., 82 N.J. Eq. 89 , and State Council, c. , v. Enterprise Council No. 6, 75 N.J. Eq. 245 .

National Council v. State Council

64 N.J. Eq. 470 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 23, 1903

Pitney, V. O’. … That the board of officers be instructed to refuse, to pay any per capita taw whatever to the national council until it has rescinded its illegally adopted and objectionable laws.

Kleiner v. Kleiner

139 N.J. Eq. 26 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 8, 1946

See Brown v. Howell, 66 N.J. Law 25 , 28 . It is, however, the settled law. … See Prudential Insurance Co. v. Fidelity Union Trust Co., 128 N.J. Eq. 327 , 330 . Such subjugation does not appear in this case.

Lister v. Lister

65 N.J. Eq. 109 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1903

Weigand v. Weigand, 14 Stew. Eq. 202, 209 (Vice-Chancellor Van Fleet, 1886); affirmed on appeal, for the reasons stated below, 15 Stew. Eq. 699; subsequently approved in Dummer v. Dummer, 41 Atl. … In Mallinson v. Mallinson, L.

W.J. S.R.R. Co. v. Cape May Co.

100 N.J. Eq. 181 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 20, 1926

Davis v. Mial, 86 N.J. Law 167 . Union Traction Co. v. … Defendants cite: Haughwout Pomeroy v. Murphy, 22 N.J. Eq. 531 ; Haupt Co. v. Board of Education of Edgewater, 87 N.J. Eq. 362 .

Iauch v. de Socarras

56 N.J. Eq. 524 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 16, 1898

Brown, 6 Johns. Ch. 139 (at pp. 151, 156). … In some of its aspects it resembles Brinkerhoff v. Brown, 6 Johns. Ch. 139 . Next we have Coddington v. Bispham, 9 Stew.

Integrity Trust Co. v. Club Atlantic, Inc.

111 N.J. Eq. 295 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 5, 1932

Central Trust Co. v. Continental Iron Works is also followed in Weinstein v. *Page 304 Anderson, 102 N.J. Eq. 8 , and in Micele v. Falduti, 101 N.J. Eq. 103 . … James Radcliffe Sons Co. v. Borough of Hawthorne, 109 N.J. Eq. 309 ; City Hall Building and Loan Assn. v. Florence Realty Co., 110 N.J. Eq. 12 .

W.J. S.S.R.R. Co. v. Stafficker

106 N.J. Eq. 412 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 9, 1930

The supreme court, over a hundred years ago, held in State v. Salem Pleas, 9 N.J. Law 246 : "When a road has been laid out and the time for opening it has elapsed, it may be vacated. … It needs no citation of law to state that this latter cannot be done without the approval of the board of public utility commissioners. This is admitted by both parties.

Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Ætna Life Insurance

74 N.J. Eq. 635 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 2, 1908

Howell, V. C. … Gulick v. Grover, 31 N. J. Law (2 Vr.) 182; Perkins v. Washington Insurance Co., 4 Cow. 645 ; Brown v. Franklin Insurance Co., 165 Mass. 565 . *644 The Alabama eases are to the same effect. Piedmont Insurance Co. v.

Sternberg v. Wolff

56 N.J. Eq. 555 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 28, 1898

Featherstone v. Cooke, L. R. 16 Eq. 298; Trades Auxiliary Co. v. Vickers, supra; Einstein v. Rosenfeld, 11 Stew. Eq. 309. … It fact, no question affecting the conduct of the business was ever brought before the board of directors for corporate action by the board in that respect.

Bolmer v. Edsall

90 N.J. Eq. 299 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 28, 1919

In Clark v. … In the courts of this country, I have been able to find but one case of a marriage on board a vessel at sea, and that is in Hynes v. McDermott, 7 Abb. N.

Central Railroad v. N. J. West Line Railroad

32 N.J. Eq. 67 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1880

North Bank v. Brown, 50 Me. 214 ; also, Baxley v. Linah, 16 Pa. St. 241; Paine v. Schenectady Ins. Co., 11 R. I. 411. … Pl. § 736 ; Way v. Bragaw, 1 C. E. Gr. 213; Conover’s Ex’r v. Conover, Sax. 403 ; McEwan v. Broadhead, 3 Stock. 129 ; Moore v. Grubbs, 3 B. Mon. (Ky.) 77 ; Brown v. Wallace, 2 Bland 585 , 601.