Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnjch

2,218 results

0.33s

  • Lippincott v. Lasher

    44 N.J. Eq. 120 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1888

    Bird, V. C. … B. 285; McCune v. Norwich Gas Co., 30 Conn. 521 ; Heywood v. Tillson, 75 Me. 225 ; O'Callaghan v. Cronan, 121 Mass. 114 ; Hunt v. Simonds, 19 Mo. 583 ; Mahan v. Brown, 13 Wend. 261 ; Auburn Flank Road Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Doremus v. Mayor of Paterson

    69 N.J. Eq. 188 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 26, 1904

    Stevens, V. C. The defendant demurs to the amended bill. The ease stands thus. In Simmons v. Paterson, 60 N. J. … Its powers are vested in a board of commissioners. In the second place, it is not, in terms, mandatory.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cumberland Trust Co. v. B. S. Ayars & Sons Co.

    83 N.J. Eq. 479 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 20, 1914

    Ayars without limitation, supervision or restraint on the part of the board; an inference of authorization eo-extensive with the scope of that management cannot be properly resisted. … Smith v. Hotel Ritz Co., 74 N. J. Eq. 296.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Kirby v. Frank

    132 N.J. Eq. 378 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 26, 1942

    Industrial Coatings Co. v. Bick, 119 N.J. Eq. 5 . … The receiver claimed that by reason of a resolution of the board of trustees of the West Ridgelawn Cemetery adopted at a meeting held on February 14th, 1906, Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dime Savings Institution of Plainfield v. Mulford

    31 N.J. Eq. 99 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1879

    All, it is said, of the members of the “ board of investment” were sworn, and they all testify that they knew nothing of the taking of the premium. … In Muir v. Newark Savings Institution, 1 C. E.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pettit v. Port Newark Nat. Bk. of Newark

    110 N.J. Eq. 324 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 20, 1932

    [McAnarney v. … Brown v. Vandyke, 8 N. J. Eq. 795; Citizens Building, Loan and Savings Association v. Coriell, 34 N. J. Eq. 383; Ackerman v. Halsey, 37 N. J. Eq. 356; Williams v. McKay, 40 N. J. Eq. 189; Campbell v. Watson, 62 N. J.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Swift v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad

    66 N.J. Eq. 34 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 11, 1904

    Emery, V. C. … (Bennett's ed.) 88; Browne Fraud (4th ed.) § 232.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Daab v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

    70 N.J. Eq. 489 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 22, 1905

    Eq. §§ 223, 230; Brown v. Edsall, 9 N. J. Eq. (1 Stock.) 256 (1852); Little v. Cooper, 10 N. J. Eq. (2 Stock.) 273 (1854); United, &c., R. R. Co. v. Hoppock, 28 N. J. Eq. (1 Stew.) 2,61, 264 (1877); Foley v. Hill, 2 H. … Brown v. Van Dyke, 8 N. J. Eq. (4 Halst.) 795, 801 (1853) ; 1 Story Eq. Jur. § 526. I shall not set forth the allegations of the bill on this subject.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • West Jersey & Seashore Railroad v. Stafficker

    106 N.J. Eq. 412 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 9, 1930

    Ingersoll, V. C. Certain questions were suggested by me at the conclusion of the oral testimony. … It needs no citation of law to state that this latter cannot be done without the approval of the board of public utility commissioners. This is admitted by both parties.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Eckrode v. Endurance Tire & Rubber Corp.

    90 N.J. Eq. 129 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1919

    Foster, V. C. … . §§ 20, &c., by Vice-Chancellor Lane in Atwater v. Baskerville, 89 N. J.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Trenton Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Armstrong

    70 N.J. Eq. 572 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 12, 1905

    In Eaton v. … In Browne v. Hammond, Johns. Ch.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Benz v. Fabian

    54 N.J. Eq. 615 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1896

    Sharp, v. Humphrey, 1 Harr. 25 ; Annin v. Van Doren, 1 McCart. 143; Borden v. Downey, 6 Vr. 74 , affirmed on error; Downey v. Borden, 7 Vr. 461 ; McClellan v. Larchar, 18 Stew. Eq. 17. … Armstrong, was fully accepted and declared by that court in the case of Cantine v. Brown, 17 Vr. 601 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Alenick v. Sorenson

    95 N.J. Eq. 518 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 17, 1924

    Church, V. C. … Reed v. Tilton, 90 N. J. Eq. 42, 43. I. was impressed by the straightforward stories told by the husband, the wife and the daughter on the witness-stand.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Goodbody v. Delaney

    82 N.J. Eq. 140 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 5, 1913

    Howell, V. C. This suit is brought by stockholders of the Fisheries Company, a New Jersey corporation, against Ordener J. … I think the true rule governing this case is found in Groel v. United Electric Co., 70 N. J. Eq. (4 Robb.) 616, and in Corbus v. Alaska Gold Mining Co., 187 U. S. 455 , and Siegman v. Kissel, 71 N. J.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • White v. Executors of Olden

    3 N.J. Eq. 343 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 15, 1843

    In Davis v. … Kee ling v. Brown, 5 Vesey, 359, is very similar to the last case cited.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sternberg v. Wolff

    56 N.J. Eq. 555 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 28, 1898

    Featherstone v. Cooke, L. R. 16 Eq. 298; Trades Auxiliary Co. v. Vickers, supra; Einstein v. Rosenfeld, 11 Stew. Eq. 309. … It fact, no question affecting the conduct of the business was ever brought before the board of directors for corporate action by the board in that respect.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Blake v. Domestic Manufacturing Co.

    64 N.J. Eq. 480 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 2, 1897

    In Whitehead v. … In Smith v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Landis v. Sea Isle City

    129 N.J. Eq. 217 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 24, 1941

    Harz v. Board of Commerce and Navigation, 126 N.J. Eq. 9 ; 7 Atl. Rep. 2d 803. … Renwick v. Hay, supra; DeLuca v. Ventura, 105 N.J. Eq. 288 ; 147 Atl. Rep. 580 , and cases cited in both of the above decisions. In Fisher v. Jackson (Wash.), 206 Pac.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Franklin Trust Co. v. Rutherford, Boiling Springs & Carlstadt Electric Co.

    57 N.J. Eq. 42 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 9, 1898

    Pitney, V. C. This is a bill to foreclose a mortgage given by the defendant corporation to the complainant corporation to secure an issue of fifty bonds of $1,000 each. … That agreement was submitted to a meeting of the board of directors, on the 16th of May, 1893, and unanimously approved, and also to a meeting of the stockholders on that day with a like result.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Bissell v. Besson

    47 N.J. Eq. 580 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 15, 1890

    Handford v. Storie, 2 Sim. & S. 196; Pemberton v. Topham, 1 Beav. 316; Innes v. Lansing, 7 Paige 583 ; Thompson v. Fisler, 6 Stew. Eq. 480. … For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Magie, Reed, Scudder, Van Syckel, Brown, Whitaker — 7. For reversal — Dixon, Garrison, Smith — 3.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.