Case law

Vreeland v. Torrey

34 N.J. Eq. 312 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1881

Those streets were laid out and opened over the property by Torrey in 1871, and in 1872 the board of chosen freeholders of the county built a bridge over a brook which the street crossed, and which is one.of the boundaries … Clark v. City of Elizabeth, 11 Vr. 172 ; Hague v. West Hoboken, 8 C. E. Gr. 354.

Herbert v. Herbert

47 N.J. Eq. 11 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1890

Glover v. Hedges, Sax. 113; Quackenbush v. Van Riper, Sax. 476, 483; Kinney v. Ogden’s Admr., 2 Gr. Ch. 168; Powers v. Butler, 3 Gr. Ch. 465; Reeves v. Cooper, 1 Beas. 223; Davis v. Headley, 7 C. E. … Co. v. Titus, 12 C. E. Gr. 102; Doughty v. Doughty, 12 C. E. Gr. 315; Holmes v. Steele, 1 Stew. Eq. 173; Dringer v. Receiver of Erie R. R. Co., 15 Stew. Eq. 573; Mechanics National Bank v. Burnett Mfg. Co., 6 Stew.

Thompson v. Thompson

91 N.J. Eq. 23 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 20, 1919

Leaming, V. C. … Stat. p. 2030) provides as follows: “For purposes of divorce, either absolute or from bed and board, jurisdiction may be acquired by personal service of process upon the defendant within this state, under the following conditions

Benton v. Kernan

125 N.J. Eq. 412 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 21, 1939

Northwestern Fertilizing Co. v. Hyde Park, 97 U.S. 1036 ; Board of Health v. Lederer, 52 N.J. Eq. 675 ; 29 Atl. Rep. 444 ; King v. Morris and Essex Railroad Co., 18 N.J. Eq. 397 . … Rowland v. New York Stable Manure Co., supra; Board of Health of Lyndhurst Township v. United Cork Cos., 116 N.J. Eq. 4 ; 172 Atl. Rep. 347 ; affirmed, 117 N.J. Eq. 437 ; 176 Atl. Rep. 142 .

Morland Mtge. Co. v. Mt. Lebanon Cemetery Assn.

141 N.J. Eq. 83 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 15, 1947

In Gottlieb v. West Ridgelawn Cemetery, 109 N.J. Eq. 585 ; 158 Atl. … *Page 88 In West Ridgelawn Cemetery v. Clifton, 20 N.J. Mis.

Executors of Rowe v. White

16 N.J. Eq. 411 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1863

Slanning v. Style, 3 P. W. 336; Richards v. Baker, 2 Atkyns 321; Foley v. Burnell, 1 Brown’s Ch. Cas. 249; Conduitt v. Soane, 1 Collyer’s R. 285; Covenhoven v. Shuler, 2 Paige 132 ; De Peyster v. … Howe v. Earl of Dartmouth, 7 Vesey 137; Benn v. Dixon, 10 Simons 636; Chambers v. Chambers, 15 Simons 183; Randall v. Russell, *417 3 Mer. 193; Covenhoven v. Shuler, 2 Paige 122 ; Clark v. Clark, 8 Paige 152 ; Cairns v.

Goodbody v. Delaney

82 N.J. Eq. 140 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 5, 1913

Howell, V. C. This suit is brought by stockholders of the Fisheries Company, a New Jersey corporation, against Ordener J. … I think the true rule governing this case is found in Groel v. United Electric Co., 70 N. J. Eq. (4 Robb.) 616, and in Corbus v. Alaska Gold Mining Co., 187 U. S. 455 , and Siegman v. Kissel, 71 N. J.

Deutsche Presbyterische Kirche v. Trustees of Presbytery of Elizabeth

89 N.J. Eq. 242 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 22, 1918

These boards, after consideration, reported to the Presbytery, which thereupon adopted the following resolutions: “1. … Aller v. Crouter, 64 N. J. Eq. 381; Holton v. Holton, 72 N. J. Eq. 312; Coffey v. Sullivan, 63 N. J. Eq. 296. These eases have no application here.

Kinmonth v. White

61 N.J. Eq. 358 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 20, 1901

So in Beck v. Burdett, 1 Paige 305 ; Eameston v. Lyde, 1 Paige 637 . There were in those cases no lands or goods subject to levy. … Browning, 12 Hun 497 . The only case that appears to be in conflict with the rule T have above .stated is Miller v. Sherry, 2 Wall. 237 .

Ward v. Kitchen

30 N.J. Eq. 31 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1878

Perry on Trusts § 465; King v. Talbot, 40 N. Y. 76 . … The' complainant is not at liberty to convert this stock into money (Neville v. Fortescue, 16 Sim. 333; Boys v.

Lithauer v. Royle

17 N.J. Eq. 40 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1864

Wontner v. Wright, 2 Simons 534; Cooke v. Brown, 4 Younge § Coll. Ex. Eq. 227. A different practice, howewer, was adopted in Upperton v. … Topp, Seaton on Decrees 97; Wride v. Clarke, Ibid. 105; Geary v. Geary, Ibid. 173; and Wakeham v.

Hitchcock v. American Pipe & Construction Co.

89 N.J. Eq. 440 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 9, 1918

Lane, V. C. … Ellerman v. Chicago Railway Co., 49 N. J. Eq. 217; Willoughby v. Chicago Railway Co., 50 N. J. Eq. 656; Appleton v. American Malting Co., 65 N. J. Eq. 375; Goodbody v. Delaney, 80 N. J. Eq. 417.

Benton v. Kernan

127 N.J. Eq. 434 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 20, 1940

To the same effect see Board of Health v. Lederer, 52 N. J. Eq. 675; 29 Atl. Rep. 444 ; Kroecker v. Camden Coke Co., supra; Rausch v. Glazer, supra; State, Board of Health of Township of Lyndhurst v. … This case was cited in Board of Health v.

South Amboy Trust Co. v. McMichael Holdings, Inc.

141 N.J. Eq. 12 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 20, 1947

To the same effect are Stonington Bank v. Davis, 14 N.J. Eq. 286 ; Farmer *Page 17 v. Ward, 75 N.J. Eq. 33 ; 71 Atl. Rep. 401 ; Pennsylvania Co., c., v. Broadway-Stevens Co., 105 N.J. Eq. 494 ; 148 Atl. … Loewenstein v. Rapp, 67 Ill. App. 678 ; Rhodes v. Missouri Sav., c., Co., 63 Ill. App. 77 ; Brown v. Miner, 21 Ill. App.? 60; affirmed, 128 Ill. 148 ; 21 N.E. Rep. 223 ; Jehle v. Brooks, 112 Mich. 131 ; 70 N.W.

Voices, Inc. v. Metal Tone Mfg. Co., Inc.

119 N.J. Eq. 324 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 27, 1936

Diamond Match Co. v. Roeber, 106 N.Y. 473 ; Nordenfeld v. Maxim, c., Co. ( 1894 ), App. Cas. 535; Rousillon v. Rousillon, 14 Ch. Div. 351; Leather, c., Co. v. Lorsont, L.R. 9 Eq. 345; Machine Co. v. … Brown Saddle Co. v. Troxel ( C.C. ), 98 Fed. Rep. 620; Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Eclair Film Co. (D.C.), 208 Fed. Rep. 416; Independent Baking Powder Co. v. Boorman ( C.C. ), 130 Fed. Rep. 726; Virtue v.

Frink v. Adams

36 N.J. Eq. 485 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1883

Van Fleet, V. C. The principal object of this suit is to procure an adjudication that the defendant holds certain lands as mortgagee, and not as owner. … Brown v. Bulkely, 1 McCart. 294; Bird v. Styles, 3 C. E. Gr. 297; Vandegrift v. Herbert, 3 C. E. Gr. 466.

Lane v. Rector of Calvary Church

59 N.J. Eq. 409 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 3, 1900

Stevens, V. C. This is a suit for specific performance of an alleged contract by defendant to convey to the complainant a lot of land in Summit. I think the complainant must fail, for two reasons: First. … The case in this respect strongly resembles Brown v. New York Central Railroad Co., 44 N. Y. 80 , in which the letter mentioning the price stated that “ other details would require consideration.”

Township of Long Beach v. Daniel B. Frazier Co.

10 N.J. Misc. 719 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 17, 1932

Realty Co. v. Scarlet, 105 N. J. Eq. 707; 149 Atl. … Rep. 170 ; Simmons v. Mayor, &c., of Wenonah, 6 N. J. Mis. R. 902; 143 Atl. Rep. 73 ; Nelson v. Town of Kearny, 4 N. J. Mis. R. 157; 132 Atl. Rep. 299 ; Brown v. City of Atlantic City, 5 N. J. Mis. R. 397; 136 Atl.

Cook v. Cook

83 N.J. Eq. 549 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 5, 1914

Brown, 76 N. J. … In Calhoun v.

Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Ass'n v. Commissioners of Asbury Park

40 N.J. Eq. 447 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1885

Angell on Water Courses §§ 109 —114 inclusive; Gould on Waters § 280; Ballard v. Tomlinson, L. R. (26 Ch. Div.) 194; Chasemore v. Richards, 7 H. L. Cas. 349; 5 H. & N. 982; Acton v. Blundell, 12 M. & W. 324; Chase v. … Silverstone, 62 Maine 175 ; Roath v. Driscoll, 20 Conn. 533 ; Delhi v. Youmans, 45 N. Y. 362 ; Goodale v. Tuttle, 29 N. Y. 459 ; Wheatley v. Baugh, 25 Renna. St. 528; Frazier v. Brown, 12 Ohio St. 294 .