Case law

Diorio v. Fair Lawn

118 N.J. Eq. 556 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 4, 1935

City of Camden v. Allen, 26 N.J. Law 398 ; Board of Freeholders of Atlantic County v. Weymouth, 68 N.J. Law 652 ; Paterson Avenue, c., Road Commissioner v. Freeholders of Hudson, 44 N.J. Law 570 ; Baker et al. v. … Den ex dem, James v. Dubois, 16 N.J. Law 285 ; State, Danforth v. Paterson, 34 N.J. Law 163 ; Smith's Executors v. Tucker, 17 N.J. Law 82 ; Steel v. Freeholders of Passaic County, 89 N.J. Law 609 ; General Inv. Co. v.

Buchanan & Smock Lumber Co. v. Brower

95 N.J. Eq. 422 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 31, 1924

Eq. 367; Houpt v. Board of Education, 87 N. J. Eq. 862, and Delaware River Quarry Co. v. Freeholders, 88 N. J. … See, also, Raymond v. Post, 25 N. J. Eq. 447; Cannon v. Wright, 49 N. J. Eq. 17, and Stiles v. Galbreath, 69 N. J. Eq. 222.

Institute Building & Loan Ass'n v. Edwards

81 N.J. Eq. 359 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 26, 1913

Leamiiig, V. C. … It is not claimed that, this belief arose from ignorance of the board of directors of complainant or any member of that board or of the conveyancer who superintended the transaction that intervening judgments against the

Bronsdon v. Shupe

98 N.J. Eq. 67 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 6, 1925

Richards v. Green, 23 N.J. Eq. 536 ; McVoy v. Baumann , *Page 69 93 N.J. Eq. 360 (at p. 378 ); Rittenhouse v. Swiecicki, 94 N.J. Eq. 36 (at p. 40 ). … Safford v. Barber, 74 N.J. Eq. 352 ; Rothholz v. Schwartz, 46 N.J. Eq. 477 . The decree will be for the complainant. *Page 70

Stevens v. Paterson & Newark Railroad

20 N.J. Eq. 126 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1869

The case of Stockham v. Browning, 3 C. E. Green 390, is urged on part of the complainant, as establishing that the right and injury in this case are sufficient to entitle him to an injunction. … The only object of the defendant in Stockham v. Browning, was to claim his right to the line on which he drove his piles, and no public or even private improvement or enterprise was delayed by the injunction.

Donohue v. Fitzsimmons

95 N.J. Eq. 125 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 17, 1923

J. 62; Mitchell v. Thorne, 134 N. Y. 536; Thompson v. Deeds, 93 Iowa 228 ; Durell v. Hayward, 9 Gray (Mass.) 249 . The right is, however, subject to the rules of the cemetery. St. Peter’s Church v. Bean, 15 Pa. … Dist. 636; McGann v. McGann, 28 R. I. 130; McGough v. Lancaster Burial Board, 21 Q. B. D. 323. The right of burial in this case was given by all the heirs or children of Mrs.

Smith v. Trenton Delaware Falls Co.

3 N.J. Eq. 505 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 15, 1845

In Wiser v. Blachly, 1 John. C. … In English et al. v. Foxal, 2 Pet.

De Bevoise v. H. & W. Co.

67 N.J. Eq. 472 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 9, 1904

Bergen, V. C. … Bellingham v. Palmer, 54 N. J. Eq. (9 Dick.) 136, and in Cranford v. Watters, 61 N. J.

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Mandel

115 N.J. Eq. 198 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 16, 1934

Eq. 563 ; Hageman v. Brown, 76 N.J. Eq. 126 , and Kuser v. Cooke, 112 N.J. Eq. 553 . … Breese v. Trenton Horse Railroad Co., 52 N.J. Law 250 ; Clyne v. Helmes, 61 N.J. Law 358 ; Redmond v. Dickerson, 9 N.J. Eq. 507 .

Taylor v. Errion

137 N.J. Eq. 221 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 16, 1945

Waugh, an employee of the company, was selected to supply the vacancy in the membership of the board. Moreover, Mr. … Errion and a representative of the Trust Company have continued to constitute the majority of the board of directors of the Provision Company.

Pollitt v. Kerr

49 N.J. Eq. 65 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1891

Van Fleet, V. C. … This is the rule that Lord Alvanley enforced in Curtis v. Curtis, 2 Brown Ch. C. 620. In that case a widow filed a bill for dower against her husband’s brother. The defendant denied the fact of marriage.

Kahn v. Rockhill

132 N.J. Eq. 188 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 26, 1942

The text so recited is supported by the decision of the Court of Errors and Appeals in Cantine v. Brown, 46 N.J. Law 599 . In Cain v. Belden, 93 N.J. Eq. 576 , 578 ; 117 Atl. … The decisions already cited, principally, Wilkinson v. Sherman, supra; Cantine v. Brown, supra; Cain v. Belden, supra; Tantum v.

Stanley-Fabian Corp. v. H.J. Theatrical, C., Co.

115 N.J. Eq. 5 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 11, 1933

Eq. 175 ; Paff v. Margerum, 103 N.J. Eq. 74 . … Newberry v. Barkalow, 75 N.J. Eq. 128 ; Fortesque v. Carroll, supra; Meaney v. Stork, 80 N.J. Eq. 60 ; Gordon Supply Co. v. Galuska, 113 N.J. Eq. 353 .

Codington v. Mott

14 N.J. Eq. 430 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1862

In Philhower v. … In Henry v. Brown, 4 Halst.

Clark v. Roeder

99 N.J. Eq. 26 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 20, 1926

Roeder, the party of the second part, or her heirs or assigns, shall board, take kind and proper care of the said Horace D. … Collins v. Collins, 45 N.J. Eq. 813 ; Holland v. John, 60 N.J. Eq. 435 ; Soper v. Cisco, 85 N.J. Eq. 165 ; Voorhees v. Christie, 96 N.J. Eq. 337 .

Vanderpool v. Vanderpool

3 N.J. Eq. 120 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1834

C. 303 ; Wainwright v. Waterman, 1 Ves. jr. 311 ; Brown et al. v. Dowthwaite, 1 Madd. R. 242 ; Edw. on Parties, 138. … The cases of Soundy v. Binyou, 3 Bro. C. C. 258, and Breton v.

Larkin v. Wikoff

75 N.J. Eq. 462 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 6, 1909

Wain v. Earl of Egmont, 3 My. & K. 445. In Cowley v. … Livesey v. Harding, 1 Tam. 460. In Gisborne v. Gisborne, 2 App.

Chapman v. Chapman

25 N.J. Eq. 394 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1874

Marsh v. Marsh, 1 McCarter 316; Sullivan v. Sullivan, 2 Addams 299; 2 Bishop on Marriage and Divorce,, § 384. … “When a suit is pending,” says Bishop, “for divorce from bed and board, or from the bond of matrimony, or for declaring a marriage duly solemnized void from the beginning, it is legally improper for the parties to live in

Conover v. Smith

17 N.J. Eq. 51 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1864

Spencer’s Case, 3 Coke’s R. 16, Res. 1 and 2; 1 Smith’s Reading Cases 22; Lametti v. Anderson, 6 Cowen 302; Thompson v. Rose, 8 Cowen 266; Tallman v. Coffin, 4 Comst. 134; Taylor’s Land. § Tenant, § 260. In Bally v. … Copper v. Wells, Saxton 14; McKibbin v. Brown, 1 McCarter 13.

Hibbert v. Hibbert

72 N.J. Eq. 778 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 21, 1907

She seldom returned to Atlantic City, but when there boarded with the friend with whom her goods were stored. … Haddock v. Haddock, 201 U. S. 562, 570 ; Watkinson v. Watkinson, 68 N. J. Eq. (2 Robb.) 632, 638. The testimony clearly discloses that complainant has not acquired a new domicile animo et facto.