Case law

Inhabitants of Phillipsburgh v. of Bruch

37 N.J. Eq. 482 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1883

Bennet v. Bittle, 4 Rawle 339 ; Rogers v. Smith, 4 Pa. St. 93. And in Lanning v. Sisters of St. Francis, 8 Stew. … Jackson v. Sill, 11 Johns. 202 ; Brown v. *486 Saltonstall, 3 Metc. 423 ; Jackson v. Moyer, 13 Johns. 531 ; Allen v. Richards, 5 Pick. 512 ; Perkins v. Jewett, 11 Allen 9 .

Robison v. Furman

47 N.J. Eq. 307 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 15, 1890

Co. v. Day, 10 Vr. 89 ; Blackford v. Plainfield Gaslight Co., 14 Vr. 438 . … For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Magie, Reed, Scudder, Van Syokel, Brown, Clement, Cole, Smith, Whitaker — 13.

Porter v. Williams

93 N.J. Eq. 88 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 22, 1921

Mary’s Church v. Stockton, 8 N. J. … See Crane v. Peer, 43 N. J. Eq. 553; Brown v. Norcross, 59 N. J. Eq. 427; Avon Land Co. v. Thompson, 60 N. J. Eq. 207; American Ice Co. v. Lynch, 74 N. J. Eq. 298.

Pennington v. Todd

47 N.J. Eq. 569 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 15, 1890

Crane v. DeCamp, 7 C. E. Gr. *571 614; Decker v. Ruckman, 1 Stew. Eq. 614; Clair v. Terhune, 8 Stew. Eq. 336. … For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Mag-ie, Reel, Scudder, Van Syckel, Brown, Clement, Smith, Whitaker — 10. For reversal — None.

Donohue v. Fitzsimmons

95 N.J. Eq. 125 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 17, 1923

J. 62; Mitchell v. Thorne, 134 N. Y. 536; Thompson v. Deeds, 93 Iowa 228 ; Durell v. Hayward, 9 Gray (Mass.) 249 . The right is, however, subject to the rules of the cemetery. St. Peter’s Church v. Bean, 15 Pa. … Dist. 636; McGann v. McGann, 28 R. I. 130; McGough v. Lancaster Burial Board, 21 Q. B. D. 323. The right of burial in this case was given by all the heirs or children of Mrs.

Scully v. Colonial Trust Co.

105 N.J. Eq. 309 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 6, 1929

Mitchel v. United Box, Board, c., Co., 72 N.J. Eq. 580 . The rule that makes voidable a corporate contract with a director, at the instance of a stockholder ( Stewart v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co., 38 N.J. … The allegation that suit was brought to forestall one Osterling, architect of the hotel, who had sued the hotel company, and lost ( Osterling v. Cape May Hotel Co., 82 N.J.

Stotesbury v. Vail

13 N.J. Eq. 390 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1861

Browne on Stat. of Frauds § 31; Hall v. Chaffee, 13 Verm. R. 150. The doctrine applies as well to cases -arising under the 10th section of the statute as under any other of its provisions. … In Natchbolt v.

Ely v. Credit Men's Adjustment, C., Bureau

106 N.J. Eq. 472 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 5, 1930

He, his wife and some of the employes formed the board of directors. … Polhemus v. Holland Trust Co., 61 N.J. Eq. 654 .

Mountford v. Mountford

94 N.J. Eq. 627 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 29, 1923

Backes, V. C. Less than four months after they were married the petitioner left her husband. … Hyland v. Hyland, 55 N. J. Eq. 35. The exception will be sustained and a decree of divorce advised.

Shinn v. Budd

14 N.J. Eq. 234 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1862

In Gadsden v. Brown, 1 Speer’s Eq. … Hayes v. Ward, 4 Johns. Ch. R. 130; Banta v. Garmo, 1 Sandf. Ch. R. 384; Wilkes v. Harper, 1 Comst. 586; Swan v. Patterson, 7 Maryland R. 164. See also Copis v. Middleton, 1 Turner & Rus. 224; Hodgson v.

Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Laise

142 N.J. Eq. 366 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 16, 1948

Rep. 736 ; Raque v. City of Speyer, Germany, 97 N.J. Eq. 447 ; 129 Atl. Rep. 207 ; Teele v. Bishop of Derry, 168 Mass. 341 ; 47 N.E. Rep. 422 ; 38 L.R.A. 629 ; 60 Am. St. Rep. 401 (cited with approval in Brown v. … Other illustrations are Bowden v. Brown, 200 Mass. 269 ; 86 N.E. Rep. 351 ; 128 Am. St. Rep. 419 , before cited; Atty. Gen. v. Hurst, 2 Cox Ch.

Munson v. Berdan

35 N.J. Eq. 376 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1882

Ira Ryerson Van Houten, son of Adrian Van Houten; Abraham Doremus ; the Board of Foreign Missions of the Reformed (late Dutch) Church; the General Synod of the Reformed Church, and the Paterson Orphan Asylum and the Ladies … Boyle v. Bishop of Peterborough, 1 Ves. jun. 299 ; Butcher v. Butcher, 1 Ves. & B. 79; Perry v. Meddowcroft, 4 Beav. 197 ; Paske v. Haselfoot, 33 Beav. 125.

Smith v. Trenton Delaware Falls Co.

4 N.J. Eq. 505 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 15, 1845

In Wiser v. Blachly, 1 John. C. … In English et al. v. Foxal, 2 Pet.

Friedland v. Isquith

106 N.J. Eq. 344 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 12, 1930

examiners for a license to practice as a physician within this state, and a license was issued to him by said board thereunder. … In Yule v.

Trafton v. Bainbridge

124 N.J. Eq. 179 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 25, 1938

Law 460 ; McClellan v. Larchar, 45 N.J. Eq. 17 ; Wilson v. Wilson, 46 N.J. Eq. 321 ; Bryan v. Bryan, 61 N.J. Eq. 45 ; Tuerk v. Schueler, 71 N.J. Law 331 ; McCloskey v. Thorpe, 74 N.J. Eq. 413 ; Hyde v. Hyde, 88 N.J. … See McCloskey v. Thorpe, 74 N.J. Eq. 413 . The recent case of Brown v. Turpan, 122 N.J. Eq. 305 , carries into effect the principle laid down in the foregoing cited cases. The same rule is expressed in Klotz v.

Jewell v. Inhabitants of West Orange

36 N.J. Eq. 403 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1883

Lewis v. City of Elizabeth, 10 C. E. Gr. 298; Dusenbury v. Newark, Id. 295; Jersey City v. Lembeck, 4 Stew. Eq. 255; Cleveland v. Road Board, Id. 473; Smith v. Newark, 5 Stew. Eq. 1; S. C. on appeal, 6 Id. 545. … Trustees &c. v. Trenton, 3 Stew. Eq. 667. The demurrer will be allowed.

Township of Southampton v. Scott

91 N.J. Eq. 443 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 17, 1920

Eq. 136; Attorney-General v. Heishon, 18 N. J. Eq. 410; Attorney-General v. Brown, 24 N. J. Eq. 89; At *446 torney-General v. Delaware and Bound Brook Railroad Co., 27 N. J. Eq. 1; Inhabitants of Woodbridge v. … It is true that in Township of Raritan v.

Stevens v. Paterson & Newark Railroad

20 N.J. Eq. 126 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1869

The case of Stockham v. Browning, 3 C. E. Green 390, is urged on part of the complainant, as establishing that the right and injury in this case are sufficient to entitle him to an injunction. … The only object of the defendant in Stockham v. Browning, was to claim his right to the line on which he drove his piles, and no public or even private improvement or enterprise was delayed by the injunction.

Cohen v. Dwyer

133 N.J. Eq. 226 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 27, 1943

Frazier v. Barnum McWilliams, 19 N.J. Eq. 316 ; Hardenburgh v. Blair, 30 N.J. Eq. 645 ; Force v. Brown, 32 N.J. Eq. 118 ; Lippincott v. Evens, 35 N.J. Eq. 553 ; Halstead v. Westervelt, 41 N.J. Eq. 100 ; 3 Atl. … Whitfield v. Kern, 125 N.J. Eq. 515 , 520 ; 6 Atl. Rep. 2d 411; W.S. Huselton Co. v. Durie, 77 N.J. Eq. 437 ; 77 Atl. Rep. 1042 ; Bigelow Blue Stone Co. v. Magee, 27 N.J. Eq. 392 ; Manning v. Jagels, 71 N.J.

Smith v. Trenton Delaware Falls Co.

3 N.J. Eq. 505 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 15, 1845

In Wiser v. Blachly, 1 John. C. … In English et al. v. Foxal, 2 Pet.