Case law

New Jersey Zinc & Iron Co. v. Morris Canal & Banking Co.

44 N.J. Eq. 398 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1888

Brown v. Morris Canal Co.,. 3 Dutch. 648. Without title to a ripa, it is entirely clear, that the complainants are in no position to assert a right to any of the land in dispute lying beyond the high-water line. … This is the view expressed by the supreme court in State v. Brown, 3 Dutch. 13, and although the judgment pronounced in that case was subsequently reversed (Brown v.

Kempson v. Kempson

58 N.J. Eq. 94 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 26, 1899

There the wife had already brought a suit in this court against her husband for divorce from bed and board-on the ground of his extreme cruelty, and he had answered, setting up the very matters in defence which he subsequently … I held in Felt v. Felt, 12 Dick. Ch.

Lawshe v. Trenton Banking Co.

87 N.J. Eq. 56 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 21, 1916

The following are cases of that class: Bainbridge v. Brown, L. R. 18 Ch. Div. 188; Kempson v. Ashbee, L. R. 10 Ch. App. Cas. 15; Archer v. Hudson, 7 Beav. 551; Baker v. Bradley, 7 De G. M. & G. 597; Thornber v. … Sheard, 12 Beav. 589; Maitland v. Irving, 15 Sim. 437; Maitland v. Backhouse, 16 Sim. 58.

Bacharach v. Bartlett

81 N.J. Eq. 248 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 2, 1913

In Doremus v. Paterson, 70 N. J. Eq. (4 Robb.) 296, Vice-Chancellor Stevens, quoting from the case of Stonemetz Printers Co. v. Brown & Company, 46 Fed. … And from Vice-Chancellor Van Eleet’s opinion in Krueger v. Ferry, 41 N. J.

Consolidated Coal Co. v. Keystone Chemical Co.

54 N.J. Eq. 309 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1896

It appears that in the latter part of 1895 there was a vacancy in the board of directors, and the other directors, for the purpose of filling it, transferred to Mr. … The claim is resisted on the authority of England’s Executors v. Beatty Organ Co., 14 Stew. Eq. 471.

Clark Thread Co. v. William Clark Co.

55 N.J. Eq. 658 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1897

This was an action brought to charge the defendant for board furnished by the plaintiff to defendant’s wife. … The judgment in this case was relied upon in the subsequent aclion for board as conclusively establishing the divorce, and so operated as a complete defence to the action brought against him for the wife’s board.

Investment B. L. Assn. v. Preisendanz

120 N.J. Eq. 441 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 15, 1936

Paterson v. Currier, 98 N.J. Eq. 48 . See, also, Naugle v. Baumann, 96 N.J. … The case at bar is not wholly unlike Naugle v.

Holmes v. Stout

3 N.J. Eq. 492 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 15, 1845

As to possession being notice, see Daniels v. Davison, 16 Ves. 249; Taylor v. Stibbert, 2 Ves. 440; Smith v. Low, 1 Atkyns, 490; Allen v. Anthony, 1 Merivale, 282; 2 Fonb. Eq. … B. 2, ch. 6, sec. 2; Lowther v. Carlton, 2 Atk. 242; Ferrars, v. Cherry, 2 Vern. 383; Mertins v. Jolliffe, Amb. R. 313; Sweet v. Southcote, 2 Brown’s Ch. R. 66; McQueen v. Farquhar, 11 Ves. 477, 8; Ingram v.

Lanning v. Chosen Freeholders

64 N.J. Eq. 161 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 1, 1902

The effect of the latter declaration in similar statutes has received judicial consideration in the cases of Benedictine Sisters v. Elizabeth, 21 Vr. 347 ; Stockton v. Newark, 29 Vr. 116 ; Brown v. … Greene v. Jersey City, 13 Vr. 118 , 565; Van Anglen v.

Newbery v. Barkalow

75 N.J. Eq. 128 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 21, 1909

Justice Fry in Richards v. Revitt, 7 Ch. Div. 224; 47 L. J. Ch. 472; German v. Chapman, 7 Ch. Div. 271; 47 L. J. Ch. 250; Woodbine Land and Improvement Co. v. Riener, 72 N. J. Eq. (2 Buck.) 787. The case of Barton v. … It was held in Morrow v.

Fidelity-Union v. Union Cemetery

102 N.J. Eq. 100 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 5, 1928

Justice Garrison, in Bliss v. … It relies on Dennis v. Glenwood Cemetery, 96 N.J.

Height v. Dem. Women's Luncheon

131 N.J. Eq. 450 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 1, 1942

Harris v. Geier, 112 N.J. Eq. 99 ; Cameron v. International Alliance, c., 119 N.J. Eq. 577 ; Gaestel v. Brotherhood of Painters, c., 120 N.J. Eq. 358 ; 7 C.J. § 34; 14 C.J. § 1282. … Bagley v. Reno Oil Co. (Pa.), 50 Atl. Rep. 760 ; Johnson v. Tribune-Herald Co. (Ga.), 116 S.E. Rep. 810 ; Des Moines Life, c., Co. v. Midland Insurance Co., 6 Fed. Rep. 2d 228.

In re Rigg

95 N.J. Eq. 341 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 4, 1924

Browning’s Executor v. Riltenhouse, 40 N. J. Law 230 (at p. 236). What the respondent, Mr. Eigg, did was to counsel and procure the sheriff to be at least technically guilty of a permissive escape.

Youmans v. Youmans

3 N.J. Misc. 576 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 21, 1925

which must he pleaded, and was not in this case, and that as an affirmative defense the burden of proof thereof is on the defendant, it seems to have been definitely determined by the court of errors and appeals in Smith v. … The Smith Case was a suit by the wife against the husband for divorce from bed and board, but I am not able to observe that any difference in principle is neeos *578 sitated or indicated by the fact that the present petitioner

Diorio v. Fair Lawn

118 N.J. Eq. 556 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 4, 1935

City of Camden v. Allen, 26 N.J. Law 398 ; Board of Freeholders of Atlantic County v. Weymouth, 68 N.J. Law 652 ; Paterson Avenue, c., Road Commissioner v. Freeholders of Hudson, 44 N.J. Law 570 ; Baker et al. v. … Den ex dem, James v. Dubois, 16 N.J. Law 285 ; State, Danforth v. Paterson, 34 N.J. Law 163 ; Smith's Executors v. Tucker, 17 N.J. Law 82 ; Steel v. Freeholders of Passaic County, 89 N.J. Law 609 ; General Inv. Co. v.

Norris v. Clark

10 N.J. Eq. 51 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1854

Although in the case of Boynton v. … And also in Warburton v. Warburton, 23 E. C. L. R. 416. But see Parker v. Sowerby, 27 E. C. L. R. 154.

Ely v. Credit Men's Adjustment, C., Bureau

106 N.J. Eq. 472 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 5, 1930

He, his wife and some of the employes formed the board of directors. … Polhemus v. Holland Trust Co., 61 N.J. Eq. 654 .

Pennington v. Todd

47 N.J. Eq. 569 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 15, 1890

Crane v. DeCamp, 7 C. E. Gr. *571 614; Decker v. Ruckman, 1 Stew. Eq. 614; Clair v. Terhune, 8 Stew. Eq. 336. … For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Mag-ie, Reel, Scudder, Van Syckel, Brown, Clement, Smith, Whitaker — 10. For reversal — None.

Flaacke v. Mayor of Jersey City

28 N.J. Eq. 110 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1877

That the award was merely nominal was due to the fact that the board of public works found that, by the deeds, he had dedicated the land in respect of which it was made to public use. … Clark v. City of Elizabeth, 8 Vr. 120 . The deeds were executed in pursuance of a written agreement, made on the 24th of Hovember, 1869, between the complainant, of the one part, and John S. Sutphen, Benjamin E.

Inhabitants of Raritan v. Port Reading Railroad

49 N.J. Eq. 11 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1891

Attorney-General v. New Jersey Railroad and Transportation Co., 2 Gr. Ch. 136; Attorney-General v. Heishon, 3 C. E. Gr. 413; Attorney-General v. Brown, 9 C. E. Gr. 90; Attorney-General v. Delaware and Bound Brook R. R. … State v. Smith, 3 Zab. 130 ; State v. Morris and Essex R. R. Co., 3 Zab. 360; Freeholders v. State, 13 Vr. 263 ; State v. Addey, 14 Vr. 115 .