Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnjch

2,218 results

1.59s

  • Tindall v. Tindall's Executors

    23 N.J. Eq. 244 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1872

    II., pp. 1679, 1682. , The case of The Attorney-General v. Johnston, Amb. 577, decided in 1769, by Lord Chancellor Camden, is a direct authority on this point. … Brown v. Ricketts, 3 Johns. Ch. 553 ; Wiser v. Blachly, 1 Johns. Ch. 438 ; Pritchard v. Hicks, 1 Paige 270 ; Story’s Eq. Pl., §§ 207 a, 212.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Neptune City v. Seacoast Trust Co.

    116 N.J. Eq. 357 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 6, 1934

    Leech v. Campbell Duncan, Inc., 103 N.J. Eq. 119 ; Shields v. John Shields Construction Co., 83 N.J. Eq. 21 ; Rogosin v. City Trust Co., 107 N.J. Eq. 79 . … The commissioner of banking and insurance has furnished me with a copy of the resolution of the board of directors of the Seacoast Trust Company which resulted in his assuming control.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Hadden v. Dandy

    51 N.J. Eq. 154 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1893

    Justice Baldwin, in McGill v. Brown, Bright. N. P. 347, and Blennon’s Estate, Bright. N. P. 339. To the same effect are the earlier cases in New York: Potter v. … In Sherwood v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Woolley v. Osborne

    39 N.J. Eq. 54 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1884

    In O’Connor v. Spaight, 1 Sch. & Lef. 305, Lord Redesdale retained *58 jurisdiction of such, a suit, under similar circumstances. See, also, Porter v. Spencer, 2 Johns. Ch. 169 . … It includes no credit for rent, nor any charge for board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Isserman v. Welt

    101 N.J. Eq. 634 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 4, 1927

    That question was whether or not the objections to the title had been removed by an ordinance of the board of public works of the city of Elizabeth, passed since notice of rescission was given. … Goldstein v. Ehrlich, 96 N.J. Eq. 52 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Denzler v. O'Keefe

    34 N.J. Eq. 361 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1881

    Brown v. Pierce, 7 Wall. 205 ; Morris v. Mowatt, 2 Paige 586 . … Ells v. Tousley, 1 Paige 280 . There will be a decree for the complainant.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Middleditch v. Williams

    47 N.J. Eq. 585 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 15, 1890

    Fulton v. Rosevelt, 1 Paige 178 ; Nalder v. Hawkins, supra; Sale v. Sale, 1 Beav. 586. … For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Mag-ie, Reed, Scudder, Van Syckel, Brown, Clement, Smith — 11.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • White v. Executors of Olden

    4 N.J. Eq. 343 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 15, 1843

    In Davis v. … Ke eling v. Brown, 5 Vesey, 359, is very similar to the last case cited.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Speer v. Speer

    14 N.J. Eq. 240 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1862

    In Matthews v. … In Latimer v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Whitehead v. Hamilton Rubber Co.

    53 N.J. Eq. 454 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1895

    In Den v. … Upon this, however, a doubt was significantly expressed by the court in the case of State v. Browning, 3 Dutch. 535, 536. In the jurat the justice said that certain trustees were sworn or affirmed.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bowker v. Cunningham

    78 N.J. Eq. 458 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 31, 1911

    In Baskcomb v. Beckwith, L. R. 8 Eq. … Upon that principle the case of Brown v. Pitcairn, 148 Pa. St. 387, was decided.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Height v. Dem. Women's Luncheon

    131 N.J. Eq. 450 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 1, 1942

    Harris v. Geier, 112 N.J. Eq. 99 ; Cameron v. International Alliance, c., 119 N.J. Eq. 577 ; Gaestel v. Brotherhood of Painters, c., 120 N.J. Eq. 358 ; 7 C.J. § 34; 14 C.J. § 1282. … Bagley v. Reno Oil Co. (Pa.), 50 Atl. Rep. 760 ; Johnson v. Tribune-Herald Co. (Ga.), 116 S.E. Rep. 810 ; Des Moines Life, c., Co. v. Midland Insurance Co., 6 Fed. Rep. 2d 228.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Cone v. Russell & Mason

    48 N.J. Eq. 208 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1891

    In Esterbrook v. … In Shirely v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Oechsle v. Ruhl

    140 N.J. Eq. 355 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 12, 1947

    In Ross v. … In City of Northfield v. Atlantic County Board of Freeholders, 85 N.J. Eq. 47 ; 95 Atl.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Lawshe v. Trenton Banking Co.

    87 N.J. Eq. 56 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 21, 1916

    The following are cases of that class: Bainbridge v. Brown, L. R. 18 Ch. Div. 188; Kempson v. Ashbee, L. R. 10 Ch. App. Cas. 15; Archer v. Hudson, 7 Beav. 551; Baker v. Bradley, 7 De G. M. & G. 597; Thornber v. … Sheard, 12 Beav. 589; Maitland v. Irving, 15 Sim. 437; Maitland v. Backhouse, 16 Sim. 58.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Dickerson v. Camden Trust Co.

    140 N.J. Eq. 34 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 28, 1947

    In Brown v. … Wild v. Brown, 120 N.J. Eq. 31 ; Babbitt v. Fidelity Trust Co., 72 N.J. Eq. 745 .

    Modified by Dickerson v. Camden Trust Company, 1 N.J. 459 (1949)Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Bacharach v. Bartlett

    81 N.J. Eq. 248 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 2, 1913

    In Doremus v. Paterson, 70 N. J. Eq. (4 Robb.) 296, Vice-Chancellor Stevens, quoting from the case of Stonemetz Printers Co. v. Brown & Company, 46 Fed. … And from Vice-Chancellor Van Eleet’s opinion in Krueger v. Ferry, 41 N. J.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Cochrane

    116 N.J. Eq. 190 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 29, 1934

    , without including a proper quantity of land on each or either side thereof unless there shall be a particular order from the board of proprietors for the purpose." … In Eldridge v. Hill, 2 Johns.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hervey v. Hervey

    56 N.J. Eq. 166 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 1, 1897

    Mar. & D. (6th ed.) § 118 a; Cadwalader v. Howell, 3 Harr. 138 (1840); Firth v. Firth, supra. … In Hunt v. Hunt, 72 N.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Williams v. McKay

    46 N.J. Eq. 25 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1889

    The delinquencies charged were classified, when this case was heard upon demurrer (Williams v. McKay, 13 Stew. … The object of a savings bank is stated by Judge Green, in Hannon v. Williams, 7 Stew.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.