Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,218 results
0.91s
Cleveland v. Essex Public Road Board
31 N.J. Eq. 473 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1879
Lewis v. City of Elizabeth, 10 C. E. Gr. 298; Dusenberry v. Newark, Id. 295. Nor will the fact that the defendants threaten and intend to sell his property for non-payment of the assessment. … Jersey City v. Lembeck, 4 Stew. 255 , 270. The bill will be dismissed, with costs.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Chosen Freeholders v. Henry
41 N.J. Eq. 388 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1886
See, especially, Lippincott v. Evens, 8 Stew. Eq. 553, and Halstead v. Westervelt, 14 Stew. Eq. 100. The demurrer will be allowed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWilson v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
83 N.J. Eq. 545 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 1, 1914
Fixt. 145; Pope v. Skinkle, 45 N. J. Law 39. This rule obtains between individuals and, a fortiori, should it be applied when public property is involved. … This is not, however, to be construed as taking from the board its duty of care and supervision. Costs will be awarded against the board.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMitchell v. United Box Board & Paper Co.
72 N.J. Eq. 580 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 14, 1907
Wilkinson v. Bauerle, 41 N. J. Eq. (14 Stew.) 635, 643, &c. (Court of Errors and Appeals, 1886). In Stewart v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co., 38 N. J. … Lillard v. Oil, &c., Co., supra (Vice-Chancellor Emery, 1903).
Cited 7 timesPublishedBoard of Education of Linden v. Vail
108 N.J. Eq. 207 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 1, 1931
Board of Education *Page 208 of the City of Elizabeth v. Zinc, 101 N.J. Eq. 78 . The money in court is available for that purpose. … Mack Manufacturing Co. v. Citizens Construction Co., 85 N.J. Eq. 331 ; affirmed, 86 N.J. Eq. 254 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedNewark Aqueduct Board v. City of Passaic
45 N.J. Eq. 393 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1889
See, also, State v. Bentley, 3 Zab. 532; Proprietors of Bridges v. Hoboken Land and Improvement Co., 2 Beas. 81; Jersey City v. Hudson City, 2 Beas. 420; Townsend v. Brown, 4 Zab. 80; Morris Canal and Banking Co. v. … In the case of the Attorney-General v. Cockermouth Local Board, L. R. (18 Eq.) 172, in 1874, I find that Sir George Jessel, M. E., dealt with testimony by Dr.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBoard of Chosen Freeholders v. State Bank
29 N.J. Eq. 268 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1878
Rex v. Pearson, 3 Price 288; Giles v. Grover, 9 Bing. 128. … In Ely v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDornbusch v. Board of Adjustment of Newark
116 N.J. Eq. 355 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 5, 1934
Florenzie v. City of East Orange, 88 N.J. Law 438 ; Eaton v. City of Newark et al., 128 Atl. Rep. 377 . The question of the validity of the permit in question is now before the board of adjustment. … Gibbs Building, c., Co. v. Town of Belleville et al., 100 N.J. Eq. 240 ; Ostrowsky et al. v. The City of Newark et al., 102 N.J. Eq. 169 . The order to show cause is discharged. *Page 357
Cited 2 timesPublishedBoard of Home Missions, C. v. Saltmer
125 N.J. Eq. 33 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 4, 1939
The fact that testator was a member of the Presbyterian Church which was always a regular contributor to that board; and that this board was, and still is, the only organization of its kind associated with the Presbyterian … Eq. 132 ; Van Nostrand v. Board of Domestic Missions of the Reformed Church in America, 59 N.J. Eq. 19 ; Caldwell National Bank v. Rickard, 103 N.J. Eq. 516 ; New Jersey Title Guarantee and Trust Co. v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedUnion Stone Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
71 N.J. Eq. 657 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 19, 1906
In the case of Doyle v. Bayonne, 54 N. J. … Law (25 Vr.) 313 (Supreme Court, 1892), the court held that the words “other *665 municipal boards or bodies” applied to the board of education of Bayonne; that the general words “other municipal boards,” following the particular
Cited 16 timesPublishedBoard of Health v. Inhabitants of Phillipsburg
83 N.J. Eq. 402 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 28, 1914
(State v. … Citing State Board of Health v. Diamond Mills Paper Co., supra.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMayor of Salem v. Board of Health
76 N.J. Eq. 264 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 4, 1909
'Walker, V. C. … See State Board of Health v. Diamond Mills Paper Co., ubi supra (at p. 115).
Cited 2 timesPublishedThomas v. Board of Education of Paterson
81 N.J. Eq. 94 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 8, 1911
Steveksoiv, V. C. The bill is filed to enforce a lien alleged to have been acquired by the complainants under the statute commonly called the Mu *96 nicipal Improvements Lien act, approved March 30th, 1892. 2 Gen. … If the money never belonged to Maloney it remains the money of the board *98 of education and constituted a convenient fund out of which the board could pay what was due to the bondsmen under their contract with the board
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Health v. North American Home
77 N.J. Eq. 464 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 7, 1910
Leaming, V. C. Two bills have been filed, in each of which the object sought is to prevent defendant from conducting in Yentnor City a sanatorium for the treatment of tuberculosis. … One bill was filed by the board of health of that city and the other by individual residents and property holders. A preliminary hearing has been had to determine whether an injunction pendente lite should be issued.
Cited 1 timesPublishedState ex rel. Board of Health v. Schmidt
83 N.J. Eq. 35 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 6, 1914
State v. Du Pont de Nemours Powder Co., 79 N. J. Eq. 32. In State v. Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co., 68 N. J. … In Rex v. Neil, 2 C. & P. 485, in a passage quoted in 1 Russ.
Cited 5 timesPublished88 N.J. Eq. 1 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 20, 1917
It got so high that he found he could drain some water through the auxiliary ditch into the bog of Brown and then removed two boards from the gates into Brown’s bog'. … Earl v. De Hart and Bailey v. Schnitzius embody the settled law of this state on this subject.
Cited 7 timesPublishedBoard, C., Glassboro v. Mayor, C., Glassboro
106 N.J. Eq. 38 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 4, 1930
Heretofore the borough has been supplying the board of education with water for its several schools at its regular rates. … See cases collected in Millville Improvement Co. v. Millville Water Co., 92 N.J. Eq. 480 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedLakatong Lodge, No. 114 v. Board of Education
84 N.J. Eq. 112 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 11, 1915
Backes, V. C. … Stevens v. Shippen, 28 N. J. Eq. 487; Taylor v. Bryn Mawr College, 34 N. J. Eq. 101; Alfred University v. Hancock, 69 N. J. Eq. 470; Hilliard v. Parker, 76 N. J. Eq. 447; 6 Cyc. 910; 5 R. C. L. 330.
Cited 6 timesPublishedLockport Felt Co. v. United Box Board & Paper Co.
74 N.J. Eq. 686 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 16, 1908
Howell, V. C. In July, 1908, this court appointed receivers of the property and assets of the United; Box Board and Paper Company, a New Jersey corporation, which is now in process of being wound up under the statute. … In Dalliba v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedState, ex rel. Board of Health v. Lederer
52 N.J. Eq. 675 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1894
After what has been said in the case of Board of Health of the City of Lambertville v. Butterfoss, which had the sanction of the court of errors and appeals (13 Stew. … Eq. 325), and in the case of Board of Health of the Township of Hamilton v. Niedt & Matthews, 19 Atl.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna