Case law

Scott v. Yard

46 N.J. Eq. 79 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1889

Justice Washington in Connecticut v. Pennsylvania, 1 Pet. C. C. 511 . … Besides, it is important to remember that the person who located the Bell tract was an agent of the board of proprietors. As was said by Chief-Justice Ewing, in Lippincott v.

Milonas v. Harmony Country Club

108 N.J. Eq. 485 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 8, 1931

In Johns v. … Lincoln Furniture Co. v. Bornstein, 100 N.J. Eq. 78 ; H. Windholz Son v. Burke, 98 N.J. Eq. 471 ; Sparks v. Lorentowicz, supra , and cases there cited. In H. Windholz Son v.

In re Apgar

37 N.J. Eq. 501 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1883

—Courts have presumed that women were past child-bearing after they had reached a certain age: In Leng v. Hodges, Jae. 585, at sixty-nine ; in Miles v. Hnighl, IS Jur. 666, at sixty-eight; in Brown v. … Two of the remaindermen are defendants; one, a daughter, earns a living and boards with her mother on these premises; the other, the son who rents the place of his mother and farms it on shares.

Cramer v. Reford

17 N.J. Eq. 367 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1866

Skillman v. Skillman, 2 Beas. 403; Belford v. Crane, 1 C. E. Green, 265. I am of opinion, therefore, that the conveyance to Mrs. … Reade v. Livingston, 3 Johns. Ch. R. 500; Beeckman v. Montgomery, 1 McCarter 106.

Voorhees ex rel. Jameson v. Polhemus

36 N.J. Eq. 456 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1883

Van Fleet, V. C. … R. v. Fitzpatrick, 36: Md. 619; Halrymple v. Lamb, 3 Wend. 424 ; Mason v. McCormick, 75 N. C. 263 ; Vance v. Fall, 48 Iowa 364 ; but see Leavitt v. Bangor, 41 Me. 458 ; Crandall v. Slaid, 11 Mete. 288; Brown v.

Temple v. Clinton Trust Co.

142 N.J. Eq. 285 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 1, 1948

Willoughby v. Chicago Junction Railway, c., Co., 50 N.J. Eq. 656 ; Goodbody v. Delaney, 80 N.J. Eq. 417 ; Solimine v. Hollander, 128 N.J. Eq. 228 . … Scott v. Hall, 60 N.J. Eq. 451 ; Friedlander v. Lehr, 101 N.J. Eq. 740 .

Bingham v. Savings Invest., C., E. Orange

101 N.J. Eq. 413 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 20, 1927

Kean v. Johnson, 9 N.J. Eq. 401 ; Zabriskie v. The Hackensack and New York Railroad Co., 18 N.J. Eq. 178 ; Black v. Delaware and Raritan Canal Co., 24 N.J. Eq. 455 , and Mills v. Central Railroad Co., 41 N.J. … Co. v. American Electrical Works, 82 N.J. Law 391 . In Black v.

Connolly v. Shannon

105 N.J. Eq. 155 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 24, 1929

of sixty shares of the capital stock of the Mercantile Trust Company of Jersey City and was also a director of the corporation and that the defendant was president, director and chairman of the executive committee of the board … My decision on this motion is controlled by the decision of the court of errors and appeals in Crowell v. Jackson, 53 N.J. Law 656 .

Atwater v. Baskerville

89 N.J. Eq. 136 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1918

Lane, V. C. Since filing the opinion in this case my attention has been called to the case of John Agnew Co. v. Board of Education of the City of Paterson et al., 83 N. J. Eq. 49. … This case is in direct conflict with the construction sought to be put on McDermott v. Woodhouse, 87 N. J. Eq. 615, by counsel for the respondents. My attention has also been called to the case of Boehme v. Rall, 51 N.

Evans v. Stanwood Rubber Co.

94 N.J. Eq. 630 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 14, 1923

Button Company v. Speilmann, 50 N. J. Eq. 120; Hastings v. Fithian, 71 N. J. Law 311. … Paterson Board of Education, 83 N. J. Eq. 49; affirmed, Ibid. 336, 339, and also because the trust company had notice of the insolvency.

Hewitt v. Hewitt

113 N.J. Eq. 299 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 5, 1931

Ballantine v. Young, 79 N.J. Eq. 70 . … Dictum that there is no distinction, as to apportionment, between extraordinary and ordinary dividends may be found in the Lang Case and in Brown v. Brown, 72 N.J. Eq. 667 , and Beattie v. Gedney, 99 N.J. Eq. 207 .

Downs v. Jersey Central Power, C., Co.

115 N.J. Eq. 348 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 13, 1934

Law 238 ; Knickerbocker Importation Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 74 N.J. Law 583 ; Hoover Steel Ball Co. v. Schaefer Ball Bearings Co., 90 N.J. … Law 530 ; Garrison v. Technic Electric Works, supra (at p. 718 ); Board of Education of the City of Millville v. Empire State Surety Co., 83 N.J. Law 293 ; Earle v. American Sugar Refining Co., 74 N.J.

New-Barbadoes Toll Bridge Co. v. Vreeland

3 N.J. Eq. 157 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 15, 1842

The treasurer swears that there was a vote of the board of directors, requiring the title to be procured for the lands under the agreement, and this suit was instituted under the belief that a single action was sufficient … Cited in Lawrence v. Lawrence, 6 C. E; Gr. 321; Lounsberry v. Locander, 10 C. E. Gr. 557.

Van Gieson's v. Banta

40 N.J. Eq. 14 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1885

Tyler v. Bell, 2 My. & Cr. 89; Bond v. Graham, 1 Hare 482; Ryves v. Duke of Wellington, 9 Beav. 579; Armstrong v. Lear, 12 Wheat. 169 ; Brown v. Brown, 4 Edw. Ch. 343 ; Campbell v. Sheldon, 13 Pick. 8 . … IC Marsh. 553; Ives v. Allen, 1% Vt. 589; Wilson v. Tappan, 6 Ohio 80 {17%); Budd v. Brooke, 3 Gill %01; Ward v. Hearne, Busbee I84. In Paschal v.

Grand Lodge v. Gaddis

65 N.J. Eq. 1 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 14, 1903

Gaddis has interposed a plea to the jurisdiction of this court, and thereby asserts that, by the constitution and laws of the complainant, there is a board of arbitration to hear and determine all controverted questions as … Ocean Castle v. Smith, 29 Vr. 545 ; S. C., 30 Vr. 198; Boxbury Lodge v. Hocking, 31 Vr. 439 ; Societa v. Cenni, 33 Vr. 652 .

Costello v. Thomas Cusack Co.

96 N.J. Eq. 90 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 5, 1922

This section was construed in the case of Audenried v. East Coast Milling Co., 68 N.J. Eq. 450 . … In that case it appeared that the certificate of incorporation provided that any resolution in writing, signed by all the members of the board of directors, should constitute the action of the board as fully as if the same

Mayer v. Journeymen Stonecutters' Ass'n

47 N.J. Eq. 519 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1890

Marselis v. Morris Canal, Sax. 31; Davidson v. Isham, 1 Stock. 186 ; Hinchman v. Paterson Horse R. R., 2 C. E. Gr. 75; Morris and Essex R. R. v. Prudden, 5 C. E. Gr. 530; Demarest v. Hardham, 7 Stew. … Counsel quoted at length from what was said by Judge Brown, in the case of the Old Dominion Steamship Co. v. McKenna et al., 30 Fed.

Everett v. Trustees of the First Presbyterian Church

53 N.J. Eq. 500 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1895

Lynd v. … Widdemer and further notices from the Presbytery, it was finally resolved, at a meeting of the board of trustees, on the 20th of June, 1895, that the board accede to. the request of the congregation made in *516 their resolution

Hoffman v. Friend

92 N.J. Eq. 60 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 5, 1920

Stevenson, V. C. … Executors, 3 Johns. 189, 192 ; Spraker v. Van Alstyne, 18 Wend. 200 ; Lockwood v. Stockholm, 11 Paige 87 ; Brown v. Knapp, 79 N. Y. 136, 143 ; Kelsey v. *64 Western, 2 N. Y. 501 , 507; Swasey v.

Williams v. Vreeland

29 N.J. Eq. 417 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1878

Jur., §§ 252, 256, 781; Dowd v. Tucker, 41 Conn. 197 ; 2 Jar. on Wills 356; Browne on Frauds, § 103. The demurrer will be overruled, with costs.