Case law

Feldman v. Warshawsky

122 N.J. Eq. 596 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 30, 1937

Peck, 21 N.Y. 581 ; Ketchum v. St. Louis, 101 U.S. 306 ; 25 L.Ed. 999 ; Walker v. Brown, 165 U.S. 654 ; 45 L.Ed. 465 . … Young v. Young, 45 N.J. Eq. 27 ; Stoddard v. Hart, 23 N.Y. 556 ; Sprague v. Cochran, supra; Brown v. Drew, 67 N.H. 569 ; 42 Atl. Rep. 177 ; Bloomfield State Bank v. Miller, 55 Neb. 243 ; 75 N.W.

Lehigh Valley Terminal Railway Co. v. Currie

54 N.J. Eq. 84 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1895

Pitney, V. C. … Under these circumstances it is not surprising that the commissioners appointed under the proceedings of the board *93 of chosen freeholders awarded defendants nominal damages.

Tooker v. National Sugar Refining Co.

80 N.J. Eq. 305 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 6, 1912

I need only refer to the leading cases of Wetherbee v. Baker, 35 N. J. Eq. (8 Stew.) 501; Donald v. American Smelting Co., 62 N. J. Eq. (17 Dick.) 729; Volney v. Nixon, 68 N. J. Eq. (2 Robb.) 605; See v. … In Knickerbocker Improvement Co. v. Board of Assessors, 74 N. J. Law (45 Vr.) 583, it was held that whether stock .is issued for value or not, the subscription fixes the basis of the tax.

Darling v. Mayor of Jersey City

73 N.J. Eq. 318 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 27, 1907

I understand the law to be that a tender of a dedication cannot be revoked (Hohokus v. Erie Railroad, 65 N. J. … De Groot v. Jersey City, 55 N. J. Law (26 Vr.) 120; Pease v. Traction Company, 69 N. J. Law (40 Vr.) 165.

West Jersey & Seashore Railroad v. Mayor of Woodbury

80 N.J. Eq. 412 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 4, 1912

In Morris Canal and Banking Co. v. State, 24 N. J. … See 13 Cyc. 478; Wood v. Hurd, 34 N. J. Law (5 Vr.) 37; Riverside v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 74 N. J. Law (45 Vr.) 476, 479.

Elizabeth Trust Co. v. Clark

96 N.J. Eq. 550 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 29, 1924

Zabriskie v. Huyler, 62 N.J. Eq. 697 (at p. 700 ); 40 Cyc. 1405; Cf. also Brown v. Mugway, 15 N.J. Law 330 (at p. 331 , bottom); Holcomb v. Lake, 25 N.J. Law 605 . … Dildine v. Dildine, 32 N.J. Eq. 78 (at p. 80 ); Pennsylvania Co. v. Riley, 89 N.J. Eq. 252 (at p. 255 ). The gift here is to the four by name, and they do not constitute a class — at least, there is no evidence thereof.

Jung v. Jung

85 N.J. Eq. 372 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 7, 1915

After she arrived, she took board at a hotel and remained for eight day's, and then started housekeeping in a four-room dwelling, which she furnished at an expense of about $100. … Magowan v. Magowan, 57 N. J. Eq. 322; Fairchild v. Fairchild, 53 N. J. Eq. 678; Miller v. Miller, 66 N. J. Eq. 436.

Piggly Wiggly Delaware v. Bartlett

97 N.J. Eq. 469 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 18, 1925

Vice-Chancellor Howell, in Arnold v. … The case of See, Receiver , v. Heppenheimer, 69 N.J.

Jankowitz v. Morristown

111 N.J. Eq. 201 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 12, 1932

Obviously, this was not a case of renting an instrumentality, as in Delaware River Quarry and Construction Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Mercer County, 88 N.J. Eq. 506 . … In Brogan v.

Gilroy v. Somerville Woolen Mills

67 N.J. Eq. 479 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 18, 1904

Bergen, V. C. … The complainants further charge that certain dividends, declared and paid by the board of directors previous to the year 1900, were not distributed from profits made by the company, but that the capital of the corporation

Finley v. Keene

136 N.J. Eq. 347 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 10, 1945

He contributed $20 as for board, each week to Louise. … The Vice-Chancellor cited Buckelew v. Snedeker, 27 N.J. Eq. 80 ; Sailer v. Sailer, 41 N.J. Eq. 398 ; Lloyd v. Turner, 70 N.J. Eq. 425 ; O'Connell v. O'Connell, 93 N.J. Eq. 603 ; Newbeck v. Newbeck, 94 N.J.

In Re Mortgage Guaranty, C., Rehabilitation Act

140 N.J. Eq. 348 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 28, 1947

Ashley Brown, as trustee, an Indenture or Trust Mortgage, dated June 1st, 1937 (hereinafter referred to as the "Original Indenture"). … Rep. 146 ; Savings Investment, c., Co. v. Associated, c., Co., 122 N.J. Eq. 95 ; 192 Atl. Rep. 584 .

Cox v. Wills

49 N.J. Eq. 130 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1891

Wills (R. & T. ed.) 649, and cases cited; Kilvington v. Gray, 10 Sim. 293; Brown v. Paull, 1 Sim. (N. S.) 92; In re Pedrotie, 27 Beav. 587, 29 L. J. Ch. (N. S.) 92; Reeve v. Beekman, supra. … Besides these investments, she loaned, in 1869, $300 to one Brown upon his note to her, and upon which he paid her interest for several years.

Tomkins v. Tomkins

3 N.J. Eq. 512 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1858

It was affirmed in this court, in Glover v. Hedges, Saxton 119; Boulon v. Scott’s adm’rs et al., 2 G. C. R. 236, 241; Vanmeter v. Executor of Jones, 2 G. C. R. 523; Gifford, administrator, v. Thorn, 1 Stockton 703. … In Barnesty v.

Tichenor v. Tichenor

41 N.J. Eq. 39 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1886

Colvile v. Middleton, 3 Beav. 570. In Mann v. … Catlin, 2 Dem. 341 ; see LeGrice v. Finch, 3 Meriv. 49. But not if he gives the mortgage or his interest in the premises. Van Wagenen v. Brown, 2 Dutch. 196; Baldwin v. Baldwin, 3 Hal. Ch. 211; but see Yardley v.

Regina Music Box Co. v. F. G. Otto & Sons

65 N.J. Eq. 582 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 22, 1903

On the day the deed of assignment bears date, there was a special meeting of *584 the board of directors of F. G. … Cooley offered a resolution that the board order a meeting of the board of directors, to be called for February 13th, for the purpose of taking such action as might be necessary pursuant to the laws of New Jersey for the

Frenche v. Kitchen

53 N.J. Eq. 37 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1894

In Brown v. Mutual Insurance Co., 5 Stew. Eq. 814, Mr. Justice Scudder, in speaking of this principle, said: “These-defendants have delayed making their defence until Israel H. … Roe v. Moore, 8 Stew. Eq. 526, 529; Demarest v. Terhune, 3 C. E. Gr. 532; Levi v. Welsh, 18 Stew. Eq. 867.

Koehler v. Koehler

99 N.J. Eq. 141 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 26, 1926

In the case of Brown v. Brown, 72 N.J. Eq. 667 (at p. 677 ), the court considered such a situation. … Young, Day v. Faulks and McCracken v. Gulick.

Randolph v. Daly

16 N.J. Eq. 313 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1863

Attorney General v. The Corp. of Poole, 4 Mylne & C. 31; Boyd v. Hoyt, 5 Paige 78 ; Brinkerhoff v. Brown, 4 Johns. Ch. R. 671. … Collyer on Partnership (5th Am. ed.) 818, and note; Herries v. Jamieson, 5 T. R. 556; Abbot v. Smith, 2 W. Bl. 947.

Martin v. Martin

78 N.J. Eq. 423 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 8, 1911

Leaming, V. C. Both parties seek a divorce; each allege that the other is guilty of statutory desertion. … I will advise a perpetual decree of divbrce from bed and board, and for alimony for the amount named.