Case law

Dloss Realty Corp. v. Schultz Brewing Co.

13 N.J. Misc. 389 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 23, 1935

Hill Bread Co. v. Goodrich Baking Co., 89 Atl. Rep. 863 ; Hilton v. Hilton, 89 N. J. Eq. 182; 104 Atl. Rep. 375 ; International Silver v. Rogers, 72 N. J. Eq. 933; 67 Atl. Rep. 105 ; Medlar & Holmes Shoe Co. v. … See, also, Trimble v. American Sugar-Refining Co., 61 N. J. Eq. 340; 48 Atl. Rep. 912 , in which Vice-Chancellor Pitney expounded the principles enunciated in the last cited case. Sullivan v. Browning, 67 N. J.

McCullough v. Hartpence

141 N.J. Eq. 499 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 6, 1948

Bowlsby v. Speer, 31 N.J. Law 351 : Jessup v. Bamford, c., 66 N.J. Law 641 ; 51 Atl. Rep. 147 ; Lightcap v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co., 90 N.J. Law 620 ; 101 Atl. Rep. 187 ; *Page 502 Sullivan v. Browning, 67 N.J. … Southmayd v. McLaughlin, 24 N.J. Eq. 181 ; Morris and Essex Railroad Co. v. Hudson Tunnel Railroad Co., 25 N.J. Eq. 384 ; Hirschberg v. Flusser, 87 N.J. Eq. 588 ; 101 Atl. Rep. 191 .

Harder v. Harder

113 N.J. Eq. 540 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 16, 1933

Clements v. Moore, 73 U.S. 299 . … Melville v. Brown, 16 N.J. Law 363 . The first of these grounds was of doubtful validity, since the debtor might, in the suit to set aside the conveyance, admit the debt.

Joselson v. Joselson

116 N.J. Eq. 180 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 25, 1934

"In Haston v. Castner, 31 N.J. Eq. 697 ; Westervelt v. Voorhis, 42 N.J. Eq. 179 , 180 ; 6 Atl. Rep. 665 ; Brown v. Wencher, 94 N.J. Eq. 710 ; 120 Atl. Rep. 637 , and Axt v. 61 Lincoln Park, 108 N.J. Eq. 459 ; 155 Atl. … In Brown v. Fessenden, 81 Me. 522 ; 17 Atl.

Young v. Young

45 N.J. Eq. 27 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1889

Perf. 174; Wallace v. Brown, 2 Stock. 308 ; Johnson v. Hubbell, 2 Stock. 332 ; Gilbert v. Trustees of East Newark Co., 1 Beas. 180; Brewer v. Wilson, 2 C. E. Gr. 180, 185; Cooper v. Carlisle, 2 C. E. Gr. 525; Eyre v. … Van Doren v. Robinson, 1 C. E. Gr. 256; Haughwout v. Murphy, 6 C. E. Gr. 118; Lawrence v. Lawrence, 6 C. E. Gr. 317; Merritt v. Brown, 6 C. E. Gr. 401, 406; Reddish v. Miller, 12 C. E. Gr. 514, 521. See, also, Fry Spec.

Lee v. Lee

77 N.J. Eq. 91 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 14, 1910

Garrison, V. C. … He ceased to board with the defendant shortly before he was married.

Schultze v. Schultze

73 N.J. Eq. 597 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 29, 1908

See, also, Hall v. Otterson, 52 N. J. Eq. (7 Dick.) 522; affirmed, 53 N. J. Eq. (8 Dick.) 695; Black v. Black, 30 N. J. Eq. (3 Stew.) 215; *600 Slack v. Rees, 66 N. J. … Garnsey v. Mundy, N. J. Eq. (9 C. E. Gr.) 243; Martling v. Martling, 47 N. J. Eq. (2 Dick.) 122; White v. White, 60 N. J. Eq. (15 Dick.) 155.

In re Flynn

87 N.J. Eq. 413 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 2, 1917

In Richards v. Collins, Mr. … The authorities cited above—Baird v. Torrey and Richard v.

Wood v. Chetwood

27 N.J. Eq. 311 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1876

Brown v. Buckley, 1 McCarter 294. So, if it discloses confidential communications, made by a client to his legal adviser, *313 it may be suppressed before hearing. 1 Daniell’s Ch. Pr. 951; Sandford v. … Lindsay v. Lindsay, 1 Dessaus. 150.

W. A. Manda, Inc. v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad

84 N.J. Eq. 624 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 15, 1915

Howell, V. C. … The proposition is very well stated in Wademan v. Albany, &c., Railroad, 51 N. Y. 568, found on the brief of the complainaixt.

Skillman v. Wiegand

54 N.J. Eq. 198 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1896

Howard, 7 Price 265; Rider v. Kidder, 10 Ves. 360; Kilpin v. Lamb, 1 Myl. & K. 520; Garrick v. Taylor, 29 Rear. 79; 7 Jur. (N. S.) 116; 30 L. J. Ch. 211; and, on appeal, 4 De G., F. & J. 159; 7 Jur. (N. S.) 1174; 31 L. … The learned chancellor cites Brown v. Brown, 23 Barb. 565 , and Marshall v. Crutwell, supra, and both are strongly in point.

Grausman v. Porto Rican-American Tobacco Co.

95 N.J. Eq. 155 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 11, 1923

Kean v. Johnson, 9 N. J. Eq. 401; Black *160 v. Delaware and Raritan Canal Co., 24 N. J. Eq. 455; Mills v. Central Railroad Co., 41 N. J. Eq. 1. … PI. & Pr. (6ih Am. ed.) 1468; citing Wood v. Griffith, 19 Ves. 550; Way v. Foy, 18 Ves. 452; Hyam v. Terry, 29 W. R. 32; Jewelt v. Drinyer, 29 N. J. Eq. 199.

Luckenbach Terminals, Inc. v. N. Bergen Twp.

125 N.J. Eq. 562 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 5, 1939

On July 5th, 1933, the board of commissioners of the township adopted a resolution to apportion the tax liens for the years 1930 to 1933, inclusive, against the land in question. … See Luckenbach Terminals, Inc. , v. Township of North Bergen, 118 N.J. Law 348 .

East Jersey Iron Co. v. Wright

32 N.J. Eq. 248 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1880

Brown, on the 13th of March, 1873, and Brown assigned them to Wright, July 7th, 1875. The origin of the rights claimed by the East Jersey Iron Company, is an agreement made by John I. … In Hanley v.

Regina Music Box Co. v. F. G. Otto & Sons

65 N.J. Eq. 582 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 22, 1903

On the day the deed of assignment bears date, there was a special meeting of *584 the board of directors of F. G. … Cooley offered a resolution that the board order a meeting of the board of directors, to be called for February 13th, for the purpose of taking such action as might be necessary pursuant to the laws of New Jersey for the

Fisler v. Porch

10 N.J. Eq. 243 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1854

In Thomson v. … In Hutchinson v. Tindall, 2 Green’s C. R. 357, and in Hart v. Ten Eyck, 2 J. C. R. 62, and in a note to the last case, 91, the numerous authorities upon this subject will be found collected and commented upon.

Tomkins v. Tomkins

3 N.J. Eq. 512 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1858

It was affirmed in this court, in Glover v. Hedges, Saxton 119; Boulon v. Scott’s adm’rs et al., 2 G. C. R. 236, 241; Vanmeter v. Executor of Jones, 2 G. C. R. 523; Gifford, administrator, v. Thorn, 1 Stockton 703. … In Barnesty v.

Jeffreys v. Charlton

72 N.J. Eq. 340 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 25, 1907

Leaming, V. C. … Wallace v. Johnstone, 129 U. S. 58, 65 ; Slutz v. Desenberg, 28 Ohio St. 371; see, also, Pom. Eq. Jur. § 1194, note 1, note “a.” In Merritt v. Brown, 21 N. J. Eq. (6 C. E.

Huston v. Read

32 N.J. Eq. 591 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1880

Read and Abraham Brown, executors. The first three (Brown died in the lifetime of the testator) proved the will and codicil, and duly *595 assumed the execution thereof. Alphonso L. … In Yates v.

Rademacher v. Rademacher

74 N.J. Eq. 570 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 25, 1908

One of these employes, a woman by the name of Frances Morrell, went to the house of defendant and engaged board there, ostensibly as a boarder. … Gower v. Gower, L. R. 2 Pr. & Div. 428. The bill should be dismissed.