Case law

Kemble v. Kemble

44 N.J. Eq. 454 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1888

Div.) 165; although, by statute in England, the surface and mines may be sold separately by the court, Brown’s Trust, 9 Jur. (N. S.) 349; Palmer's Will, L. R. (13 Eq.) 408; Pryse’s Case, L. R. (10 Eq.) 531. … Ch. 98; Darvill v. Roper, 3 Drew. 294; and of clay-beds, Massot v. Moses, 3 Rich. (N. S.) 168; Curtis v. Coleman, 22 Grant’s Ch. 561; Rockwell, v. Morgan, 2 Beas. 384, 390; see Yander v.

Coe v. New Jersey Midland Railway Co.

31 N.J. Eq. 105 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1879

Lewis v. Smith, 9 N. Y. 502, 514 ; Bogey v. Shute, 4 Jones Eq. 174 ; Jones v. St. John, 4 Sandf. Ch. 208; Wilkins v. Kirkbride, 12 C. E. Gr. 93. … R. v.

Male v. Williams

48 N.J. Eq. 33 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1891

Gifford v. Thorn, 1 Stock. 702 ; Clayton v. Somer’s Exr., 12 C. E. Gr. 230; Howell v. Green, 2 Vr. 570 ; House v. Ewen, 10 Stew. Eq. 368; Acken v. Osborn, 18 Stew. Eq. 377; Neilson v. Bishop, 18 Stew. Eq. 473. … . & G. 280; White v. Hill, 4 Eq. Cas. Abr. 265; Casamajor v. Strode, 8 Jur. 14; In re Brown’s Trust, L. R. (16 Eq.) 239; Treharne v. Layton, L. R. (10 Q. B.) 459; White v. Hight, 12 Ch. D. 751; Dubois v. Ray, 35 N.

Brady v. Carteret Realty Co.

68 N.J. Eq. 55 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 10, 1905

Such has been the apparent trend of all orneases, from the leading case of Powell v. Mayo, 26 N. J. Eq. *57 (11 C. E. Gr.) 120; S. C., 27 N. J. Eq. (12 C. E. Gr.) 440. See Holmes v. Chester, 26 N. J. Eq. (11 C. E. … Brown, and you will please pay the rent to him from the 1st of December, 1880.” This offer was overruled and exception duly taken.

Paletz v. Camden Safe Deposit, C., Co.

109 N.J. Eq. 344 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 10, 1931

Demars v. Koehler, 60 N.J. Law 314 (at p. 316 ); Condit v. Neighbor, 13 N.J. Law 83 (at p. 91 ). … In Haston v. Castner, 31 N.J. Eq. 697 ; Westervelt v. Voorhis, 42 N.J. Eq. 179 , 180 ; Brown v. Wencher, 94 N.J. Eq. 710 , and Axt v. 61 Lincoln Park, Inc., 108 N.J.

Cameron v. International, C., N.J.

114 N.J. Eq. 495 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 5, 1933

Lawless v. Fleming, 56 N.J. Eq. 815 ; Fuller v. Hollander Co., 61 N.J. Eq. 648 , 651 ; Copper King v. Robert, 76 N.J. Eq. 251 ; 1 Dan. Ch. Pl. Pr. ( 6th Am. ed. ) [*] 1817. … Phillips v. Interstate Hosiery Mills, Inc., 111 N.J. Eq. 432 . In Condict v. *Page 497 Wood, 25 N.J.

English v. English

27 N.J. Eq. 71 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1876

Such gross and reprehensible abuse of marital rights as that of which he has been guilty,, is just ground for a divorce from bed and board. Moores v. Moores, 1 C. E. Green 275; Shaw v. … A divorce from bed and board * forever, will be decreed. The complainant’s health, however, may hereafter be restored, and it may become desirable that they should again live together.

Paul v. Paul

37 N.J. Eq. 23 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1883

. *24 Leach boarded in the house with the parties while they lived together, and with the defendant afterwards, at various times, altogether for about four years. He boarded there until May, 1881. … defendant admits that she called on Leach, at Forman’s, at various times while he was living there, but alleges (and so does he) that her object in doing so was merely to endeavor to collect from him money which he owed her for board

Slocum v. Wooley

43 N.J. Eq. 451 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1887

Co., 8 Vr. 23 ); or to marry when a divorce shall have been obtained (Noice v. Brown, 10 Vr. 133 ); or to renounce an executorship (Ellicott v. Chamberlain, 11 Stew. … Whyte v. Arthur, 2 C. E. Gr. 521; McVay v. McVay, 10 Atl. Rep. 178 ; Smith v. Howell, 3 Stock. 349, 352 ; Eaton v. Eaton, 6 Vr. 290 .

Dudley v. Dickson

14 N.J. Eq. 252 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1862

Van Doren v. Todd, 2 Green’s Ch. R. 397; Brinkerhoof v. Vansciven, 3 Ibid. 251; Garson v. Green, 1 Johns. Ch. R. 308; 4 Kent’s Com. 152. … Gilman v. Brown, 1 Mason 191 ; S. C. on appeal, 4 Wheat. 255 ; Nairn v. Prowse, 6 Vesey 752.

Ewert v. Lichtman

141 N.J. Eq. 34 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 13, 1947

Rep. 2d 565; Kleiner v. Kleiner, 139 N.J. Eq. 26 ; 49 Atl. Rep. 2d 582; Hochman v. Zigler's, Inc., 139 N.J. Eq. 139 ; 50 Atl. Rep. 2d 97. At law, M.L. Shoemaker Co. , v. Board of Health, c., 83 N.J. Law 425 ; 85 Atl. … Shoemaker Co. v. Board of Health, supra; D'Aloia v. Summit, supra; McCrory Stores Corp. v. Braunstein, supra.

Gaestel v. Brotherhood of Painters, C.

120 N.J. Eq. 358 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 18, 1936

An appeal by Gaestel to the general executive board of the brotherhood was not sustained. … People v. Musical Mutual Protective Union, 118 N.Y. 101 ; 23 N.E. Rep. 128 ; Weiss v. Musical Mutual Protective Union, 189 Pa. 446 ; 42 Atl. Rep. 118 ; Fales v. Musician's Protective Union, 40 R.I. 34 ; 99 Atl.

Springgarden B. L. Assn. v. Fusaro

124 N.J. Eq. 205 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 14, 1938

Bunting v. Bunting, 87 N.J. Eq. 20 ; Weining v. Selitto, 121 N.J. Eq. 60 ; affirmed, Id. 613, and Co-Investors Building and Loan v. Billet, 175 Atl. Rep. 90 . … Shultz v. Sanders, 38 N.J. Eq. 154 ; affirmed, sub. nom. Eisberg v. Shultz, Id. 293 ; Banta v. Board of Trustees, 39 N.J. Eq. 123 ; Silver v. Gattel, 89 N.J. Eq. 402 . Complainant's title is good. Strike the answer.

Wendt v. Bergen Savings Bank

131 N.J. Eq. 380 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 13, 1942

On the day last aforesaid, the Savings Bank, through its board of managers, transferred its assets and its good will to the Trust Company. … Cole v. Brandle, 127 N.J. Eq. 31 ; 11 Atl. Rep. 2d 255; Phair v. Melosh, 125 N.J. Eq. 497 ; 6 Atl. Rep. 2d 491; affirmed, 127 N.J. Eq. 15 ; 11 Atl. Rep. 2d 32; Hinners v. Banville, 114 N.J. Eq. 348 ; 168 Atl.

North Ward National Bank v. Conklin

51 N.J. Eq. 7 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1893

The same meaning was given to the statute by Chancellor Williamson, in 1853, in Brown v. Holcomb, 1 Stock. 297 ; by Chancellor Green, in 1862, in Fairchild v. … Owen v. Arvis, supra; Knight v. Packer, 1 Beas. 214; Servis v. Nelson, 1 McCart. 94; National Bank of the Metropolis v. Sprague, 6 C. E. Gr. 530 ; Walker v. Hill’s Executors, 7 C. E. Gr. 528 ; De Witt v.

Duttkin v. Zalenski

136 N.J. Eq. 81 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 5, 1945

Cooley v. Brown, 30 Iowa 470 , 473 . Fourthly, although the factual circumstances did not invoke such a ruling, the dictum noticeable in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Grey in Schwalber v. Ehman ( 1901 ), 62 N.J. … See, also, Higgins v. Gillesheiner, 26 N.J. Eq. 308 ; Lembeck Betz Eagle Brewing Co. v. Kelly, 63 N.J. Eq. 401 ; 51 Atl. Rep. 794 ; Bose v. Meury, 112 N.J. Eq. 62 ; 163 Atl. Rep. 276 ; Central-Penn, c., Bank v.

Hartman v. Church Construction Co.

101 N.J. Eq. 512 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 28, 1927

In the case of Agens v. Koch, 74 N.J. … Complainant insists that defendant knew of the existence of the condemnation proceedings and was willing to take subject thereto and try to make a profit from the board of education. In the case of Goldstein v.

Hunt v. West Jersey Traction Co.

62 N.J. Eq. 225 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 24, 1901

. *229 Flagg v. Bonnel, 2 Stock. 84 , citing cases. The court does not inquire into the materiality of the facts set up in the plea. … Ib. 85; Miller v. United States Casualty Co., 16 Dick. Ch. Rep. 101.

Bey v. Bey

83 N.J. Eq. 239 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1914

During these nine months they boarded. They then quit boarding and took up housekeeping at 138 Court street, where they lived together for two and a half to three years. While at the latter place, Mrs. … (Ed. of 1891) § 320; Dickinson v. Brown, 49 Miss. 357, 370 ; Fryer v. Fryer, Rich. Eq. Cases (S. C.) 85. In Van Tuyl v.

Yearance v. Powell

55 N.J. Eq. 577 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 15, 1897

She received no stated wages and paid no board. In 1867, she married, but remained in the household until the next year, when Mr. Randell married the second time. … The principle recognized by this court in Williams v. Vreeland, 5 Stew. Eq. 734, and the precedents therein approved warrant a *580 decree in Mrs. Powell’s favor, but not the one made.