Case law

Parsons v. Lent

34 N.J. Eq. 67 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1881

The fact that the board held its meetings in Philadelphia will not affect the company’s claim to protection in this suit. Coe v. N. J. Midland R. R. Co., 4 Stew. Eq. 105, 117. … He, however, it may be remarked, was not superintendent at or previous to the time when the deed to the company was delivered, and if he had been, on the principle of *73 the case of Barnes v.

McCarter v. Pitman, Glassboro & Clayton Gas Co.

74 N.J. Eq. 255 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 7, 1908

The same view is there taken as to the effect of that statute before the provision was added touching the conclusive force of the judgment of the board of directors as to values. Bickley v. Schlag, 46 N. J. … As is said in Bickley v.

Sheen v. Sheen

126 N.J. Eq. 132 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 24, 1939

The case of Noice v. Schnell, 101 N.J. Eq. 252 (at p. 257 ); 137 Atl. … In Attorney-General v. Whorwood, 1 Ves.

In re Alexander

53 N.J. Eq. 96 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1894

Green, V. C. … The judgment creditors served a notice on the road board warning them not to pay the award to Kirtland.

In re the appeal from Atlantic county orphans court admitting to probate a certain paper-writing of the last will and testament of Allen

107 N.J. Eq. 561 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 5, 1930

V. Lewis and Lewis Starr, esquires, proctors *562 for proponent, $10,000, together with their costs and expenses amounting to $826.05; to Allen B. … Endicott, esquire, proctor for the caveator, $10,000, together with his costs and expenses amounting to $1,105.67; to William Elmer Brown, Jr., esquire, proctor for Thomas Allen et al., “who were cited as legatees under a

Wendt v. Bergen Savings Bank

131 N.J. Eq. 380 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 13, 1942

On the day last aforesaid, the Savings Bank, through its board of managers, transferred its assets and its good will to the Trust Company. … Cole v. Brandle, 127 N.J. Eq. 31 ; 11 Atl. Rep. 2d 255; Phair v. Melosh, 125 N.J. Eq. 497 ; 6 Atl. Rep. 2d 491; affirmed, 127 N.J. Eq. 15 ; 11 Atl. Rep. 2d 32; Hinners v. Banville, 114 N.J. Eq. 348 ; 168 Atl.

Interstate Sanitation Com. v. Weehawken Twp.

141 N.J. Eq. 536 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 13, 1948

State Board, c. , v. Newark Milk Co., 118 N.J. … Carlisle v. Cooper, 21 N.J. Eq. 576 ; State Board, c., v. Diamond Mills Paper Co., supra; State Board, c. , v.

Kauder v. Lautman

114 N.J. Eq. 197 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 16, 1933

v. … Brown v. Bulkley , cited in the opinion, involved a charge of fraud arising from a transaction between the attorney and his client; in Crocheron v.

Crocker v. Crocker

112 N.J. Eq. 203 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 20, 1933

Somers v. Pierson, 16 N.J. Law 181 . "It is not a word, it is the intent of a testator, manifested in his will that is sacred and must prevail." Den, ex dem. Brown v. Mugway, 15 N.J. Law 330 ; Elizabeth Trust Co. v. … Johnson v. Poulson, 32 N.J. Eq. 390 ; Shannon v. Ryan, 91 N.J. Eq. 491 .

Doremus v. Mayor of Paterson

70 N.J. Eq. 296 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 30, 1905

Stone metz Printers Co. v. Brown & Co., 46 Fed. Rep. 851. … Leslie v. Leslie, 50 N. J. Eq. (5 Dick.) 155; Doane & Jones Lumber Co. v. Essex Building and Land Co., 59 N. J. Eq. (14 Dick.) 142.

McCran v. Public Service Railway Co.

95 N.J. Eq. 22 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 17, 1923

See Whitecar v. Michenor, 37 N. J. Eq. 6; Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. Kelley, 77 N. J. Eq. 129; Barna v. Kirczow, 71 N J. Eq. 196, 201; Savage v. Port Reading Railroad Co., 73 N. J. … In Savannah, &c., Co. v.

Hunt v. West Jersey Traction Co.

62 N.J. Eq. 225 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 24, 1901

. *229 Flagg v. Bonnel, 2 Stock. 84 , citing cases. The court does not inquire into the materiality of the facts set up in the plea. … Ib. 85; Miller v. United States Casualty Co., 16 Dick. Ch. Rep. 101.

Perlman v. Perlman

113 N.J. Eq. 3 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 21, 1933

The provision of our statute above quoted has been given force and effect in Jung v. Jung, 85 N.J. Eq. 372 ; Lister v. Lister, supra; Hollingshead v. Hollingshead, 91 N.J. Eq. 261 ; Sechler v. Sechler, 94 N.J. … Eq. 47 ; Garabrant v. Garabrant, 95 N.J. Eq. 136 ; Feickert v. Feickert, 98 N.J. Eq. 444 .

Bey v. Bey

83 N.J. Eq. 239 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1914

During these nine months they boarded. They then quit boarding and took up housekeeping at 138 Court street, where they lived together for two and a half to three years. While at the latter place, Mrs. … (Ed. of 1891) § 320; Dickinson v. Brown, 49 Miss. 357, 370 ; Fryer v. Fryer, Rich. Eq. Cases (S. C.) 85. In Van Tuyl v.

Inhabitants of Bloomfield v. Mayor of Glen Ridge

54 N.J. Eq. 276 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1896

In Board of Health of Buena Vista Township v. City of East Saginaw, 45 Mich. 257 , land had been conveyed to the board of health in trust for cemetery purposes for the township of Buena Vista. … S. 315 ; Mount Pleasant v. Beckwith, 100 U. S. 525 ; Board v. Board, 30 W. Va. 424 ; North Hemstead v.

New Jersey Interstate Bridge & Tunnel Commission v. City of Jersey City

93 N.J. Eq. 550 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 13, 1922

Co. v. Public Utility Board, 85 N. J. Law 511. The building code of Jersey City was of course enacted subject to the power of the state to modify or annul it at any time. … Jersey City v. City of Hudson, supra; Barnes v. Essex County Park Commission, 86 N. J. Law 141.

Donald v. American Smelting & Refining Co.

61 N.J. Eq. 458 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 11, 1901

In Douglas v. Ireland, 73 N. … In Bickley v. Schlag, 1 Dick. Ch.

Boehm v. Rieder

96 N.J. Eq. 167 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 24, 1924

Moreover, it has been decided by this court, in Cropper v. Brown, 76 N.J. … These cases are cited by Vice-Chancellor Garrison in Cropper v. Brown, supra. Again, in Mulford v. Hiers, 13 N.J.

Kemble v. Kemble

44 N.J. Eq. 454 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1888

Div.) 165; although, by statute in England, the surface and mines may be sold separately by the court, Brown’s Trust, 9 Jur. (N. S.) 349; Palmer's Will, L. R. (13 Eq.) 408; Pryse’s Case, L. R. (10 Eq.) 531. … Ch. 98; Darvill v. Roper, 3 Drew. 294; and of clay-beds, Massot v. Moses, 3 Rich. (N. S.) 168; Curtis v. Coleman, 22 Grant’s Ch. 561; Rockwell, v. Morgan, 2 Beas. 384, 390; see Yander v.

Tynan v. Warren

53 N.J. Eq. 313 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1895

Pl. 267, 268; Dean v. Dean, supra; Brown St. F. § 113. .Our statute relating to trusts (Rev. p. § 3) is an almost exact copy of 29 Car. … II. c. 3 §§ 7, 8, and the fifth section of our act relating to agreements for the sale of lands is taken from section 4 of the English act (Appendix to Brown St. F).