Case law

Reeves v. Morgan

48 N.J. Eq. 415 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1891

Lord Thurlow, in Atkinson v. Leonard, 3 Brown Ch. … But Perkins v.

State ex rel. Gehrmann v. Osborne

79 N.J. Eq. 430 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 6, 1911

Pr. 118 ; People v. Allen (Ill., 1895), 41 L. R. A. 473; People v. Blackburn, 6 Utah 347 ; People v. Brown, 54 Mich. 15 ; United States v. Wilson, 46 Fed. Rep. 748; Gray v. … their statute with respect to probation, or releasing on parole, made it improper thereafter to indefinitely suspend the imposition of a sentence except in cases where the defendant was placed under the jurisdiction of the board

Tynan v. Warren

53 N.J. Eq. 313 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1895

Pl. 267, 268; Dean v. Dean, supra; Brown St. F. § 113. .Our statute relating to trusts (Rev. p. § 3) is an almost exact copy of 29 Car. … II. c. 3 §§ 7, 8, and the fifth section of our act relating to agreements for the sale of lands is taken from section 4 of the English act (Appendix to Brown St. F).

Coe v. New Jersey Midland Railway Co.

31 N.J. Eq. 105 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1879

Lewis v. Smith, 9 N. Y. 502, 514 ; Bogey v. Shute, 4 Jones Eq. 174 ; Jones v. St. John, 4 Sandf. Ch. 208; Wilkins v. Kirkbride, 12 C. E. Gr. 93. … R. v.

Kauder v. Lautman

114 N.J. Eq. 197 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 16, 1933

v. … Brown v. Bulkley , cited in the opinion, involved a charge of fraud arising from a transaction between the attorney and his client; in Crocheron v.

New Jersey Interstate Bridge & Tunnel Commission v. City of Jersey City

93 N.J. Eq. 550 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 13, 1922

Co. v. Public Utility Board, 85 N. J. Law 511. The building code of Jersey City was of course enacted subject to the power of the state to modify or annul it at any time. … Jersey City v. City of Hudson, supra; Barnes v. Essex County Park Commission, 86 N. J. Law 141.

Paletz v. Camden Safe Deposit, C., Co.

109 N.J. Eq. 344 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 10, 1931

Demars v. Koehler, 60 N.J. Law 314 (at p. 316 ); Condit v. Neighbor, 13 N.J. Law 83 (at p. 91 ). … In Haston v. Castner, 31 N.J. Eq. 697 ; Westervelt v. Voorhis, 42 N.J. Eq. 179 , 180 ; Brown v. Wencher, 94 N.J. Eq. 710 , and Axt v. 61 Lincoln Park, Inc., 108 N.J.

Williams v. Vreeland

32 N.J. Eq. 135 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1880

In Browne v. … Mickleston v. Brown, 6 Ves. 51 {1801); Slickland v. Aldridge, 9 Ves. 515 {1804) > Paine v. Hall, 18 Ves. 475 {1812) ; Russell v. Jackson, 9 Hare 886, 10 Hare 198 {1852); Wallgrave v. Tebbs, 2 K. &. J. 818 {1855); Tee v.

Hill v. Hill

97 N.J. Eq. 237 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 26, 1925

This is a suit for divorce from bed and board on the ground of extreme cruelty. … I will advise a decree of divorce from bed and board for life.

Springgarden B. L. Assn. v. Fusaro

124 N.J. Eq. 205 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 14, 1938

Bunting v. Bunting, 87 N.J. Eq. 20 ; Weining v. Selitto, 121 N.J. Eq. 60 ; affirmed, Id. 613, and Co-Investors Building and Loan v. Billet, 175 Atl. Rep. 90 . … Shultz v. Sanders, 38 N.J. Eq. 154 ; affirmed, sub. nom. Eisberg v. Shultz, Id. 293 ; Banta v. Board of Trustees, 39 N.J. Eq. 123 ; Silver v. Gattel, 89 N.J. Eq. 402 . Complainant's title is good. Strike the answer.

Slocum v. Wooley

43 N.J. Eq. 451 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1887

Co., 8 Vr. 23 ); or to marry when a divorce shall have been obtained (Noice v. Brown, 10 Vr. 133 ); or to renounce an executorship (Ellicott v. Chamberlain, 11 Stew. … Whyte v. Arthur, 2 C. E. Gr. 521; McVay v. McVay, 10 Atl. Rep. 178 ; Smith v. Howell, 3 Stock. 349, 352 ; Eaton v. Eaton, 6 Vr. 290 .

Randall v. Morrell

17 N.J. Eq. 343 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1866

Law v. Ford, 2 Paige 310 ; Marten v. Van Schaick, 4 Paige 479 . … The rule in this restricted, and, as it seems to me, highly reasonable form, will be found propounded and elucidated in the cases of Renton v. Chaplain, 1 Stockt. 62; Birdsall v. Colie, 2 Stockt. 63 ; Cox v.

White v. Tide Water Oil Co.

50 N.J. Eq. 1 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1892

The principle of these cases is also recognized and applied in Dill v. The Board of Education of Camden, 2 Dick. Ch. Rep. 421. … Gawtry v. Leland, supra; Lehigh Zinc and Iron Co. v. Trotter, 16 Stew. Eq. 205; Hart v. Leonard, 15 Stew. Eq. 416; Dill v. Board of Education of Camden, supra. The demurrer will be overruled, with costs.

Kemble v. Kemble

44 N.J. Eq. 454 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1888

Div.) 165; although, by statute in England, the surface and mines may be sold separately by the court, Brown’s Trust, 9 Jur. (N. S.) 349; Palmer's Will, L. R. (13 Eq.) 408; Pryse’s Case, L. R. (10 Eq.) 531. … Ch. 98; Darvill v. Roper, 3 Drew. 294; and of clay-beds, Massot v. Moses, 3 Rich. (N. S.) 168; Curtis v. Coleman, 22 Grant’s Ch. 561; Rockwell, v. Morgan, 2 Beas. 384, 390; see Yander v.

Paul v. Paul

37 N.J. Eq. 23 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1883

. *24 Leach boarded in the house with the parties while they lived together, and with the defendant afterwards, at various times, altogether for about four years. He boarded there until May, 1881. … defendant admits that she called on Leach, at Forman’s, at various times while he was living there, but alleges (and so does he) that her object in doing so was merely to endeavor to collect from him money which he owed her for board

Crocker v. Crocker

112 N.J. Eq. 203 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 20, 1933

Somers v. Pierson, 16 N.J. Law 181 . "It is not a word, it is the intent of a testator, manifested in his will that is sacred and must prevail." Den, ex dem. Brown v. Mugway, 15 N.J. Law 330 ; Elizabeth Trust Co. v. … Johnson v. Poulson, 32 N.J. Eq. 390 ; Shannon v. Ryan, 91 N.J. Eq. 491 .

Cameron v. International, C., N.J.

114 N.J. Eq. 495 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 5, 1933

Lawless v. Fleming, 56 N.J. Eq. 815 ; Fuller v. Hollander Co., 61 N.J. Eq. 648 , 651 ; Copper King v. Robert, 76 N.J. Eq. 251 ; 1 Dan. Ch. Pl. Pr. ( 6th Am. ed. ) [*] 1817. … Phillips v. Interstate Hosiery Mills, Inc., 111 N.J. Eq. 432 . In Condict v. *Page 497 Wood, 25 N.J.

Wilson v. Seeber

72 N.J. Eq. 523 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1907

of Education v. … And the same doctrine was acted upon in Brown v. Dunn, 50 N. J. Law (21 Vr.) 111, also a case of the exercise of equitable jurisdiction by the court. There is a case in New York of Williams v. Ingersoll, 89 N.

Kelsey v. New England Street Railway Co.

60 N.J. Eq. 230 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 3, 1900

Stevens, V. C. The New England Street Railway Compaq, a corporation organized under the act concerning corporations, was formed, inter alia, to purchase, hold, sell, invest, trade and deal in stocks. … On October 9th of that year, the board of directors of the New England company passed a resolution appointing a committee consisting of the president and two other directors “to receive any offers that might be made for the

North Ward National Bank v. Conklin

51 N.J. Eq. 7 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1893

The same meaning was given to the statute by Chancellor Williamson, in 1853, in Brown v. Holcomb, 1 Stock. 297 ; by Chancellor Green, in 1862, in Fairchild v. … Owen v. Arvis, supra; Knight v. Packer, 1 Beas. 214; Servis v. Nelson, 1 McCart. 94; National Bank of the Metropolis v. Sprague, 6 C. E. Gr. 530 ; Walker v. Hill’s Executors, 7 C. E. Gr. 528 ; De Witt v.