Case law

Phelps Dodge v. United, America

138 N.J. Eq. 3 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 20, 1946

The acts of that Board, which was abolished early this winter, were not reviewable or enforceable in any court; their character was advisory. Employers Group, c. , v. N.W.L.B., 143 Fed. Rep. 2d 145; N.W.L.B. v. U.S. … Rep. 2d 97; N.W.L.B. v. Montgomery Ward Co., 144 Fed. Rep. 2d 528. A decision of the War Labor Board does not constitute an obligation imposed by law.

Rutan v. Crawford

45 N.J. Eq. 99 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1889

Bird, V. C. On June 16th, 1858, Rutan married Esther, the daughter of Hannah Crawford, the defendant. … Kine v. Balfe, 2 Ball & B. 347; Wilson v. West Hatlepool Railway, 11 Jur. (N. S.) 124, 34 L. J. Ch. 241; Listher v. Foxcroft, Coll. Parl. Cas. 108, Gilb. 411; Gregory v. Mighell, 18 Ves. 328.

Dayton v. Quigley

29 N.J. Eq. 77 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1878

This suit is instituted to obtain relief from the action of the board of water commissioners (the defendants) of the city of Trenton, injurious to the complainant. … The defendants base their action on a rule of the board which provides that “ water rents shall be payable half-yearly in advance, on the first days of April and October.

Pound v. Pleister

106 N.J. Eq. 101 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 30, 1930

McKibbin v. Brown, 14 N.J. Eq. 13 ; affirmed, 15 N.J. Eq. 498 ; Potter v. Hollister, 45 N.J. Eq. 508 ; affirmed, 46 N.J. Eq. 609 ; Meyers v. Metzger, 63 N.J. Eq. 779 ; Doutney v. Lambie, 78 N.J. Eq. 277 ; Van Riper v. … Van Riper v.

N.J. Title v. American, Red Cross

111 N.J. Eq. 12 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 10, 1932

Board of Domestic Missions of the Reformed Church in America, 59 N.J. Eq. 19 . … In Moore's Executor v.

Washington Building & Loan Ass'n v. Beaghen

27 N.J. Eq. 98 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1876

Herbert v. Mech. Build, and Loan Assoc., 2 C. E. Green 497. … This appears by the resolution of the board granting the loan, and it is evident that Beaghen so understood the matter. The complainants are entitled to the benefit of the security of that mortgage accordingly.

Lucas v. King

10 N.J. Eq. 277 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1854

Alnat on Partition 101; Bliman v. Brown, 2 Vern. 282; 1 Story’s Eq., note 1, § 650.

Parsons v. Lent

34 N.J. Eq. 67 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1881

The fact that the board held its meetings in Philadelphia will not affect the company’s claim to protection in this suit. Coe v. N. J. Midland R. R. Co., 4 Stew. Eq. 105, 117. … He, however, it may be remarked, was not superintendent at or previous to the time when the deed to the company was delivered, and if he had been, on the principle of *73 the case of Barnes v.

Schanck v. Schanck

33 N.J. Eq. 363 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1881

They boarded there until the middle of April, 1871, when he failed in business. … Jennings v. Jennings, 2 Beas. 38; Cornish v. Cornish, 8 C. E. Gr. 208; Bowlby v. Bowlby, 10 C. E. Gr. 406. In Cornish v.

Fidelity v. McClintic-marshall Corp

115 N.J. Eq. 470 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 16, 1934

Board of Education v. Zink, 101 N.J. Eq. 78 ; Grover v. Board of Education, 102 N.J. Eq. 415 ; 104 N.J. Eq. 197 ; John W. Barwell, Inc., v. Vail, 108 N.J. Eq. 117 ; 111 N.J. Eq. 431 ; Guise v. John C. … West Shore Railroad Co. v. State Board, 92 N.J.L. 332 , 648 ; 104 Atl. Rep. 335 ; 106 Atl. Rep. 893 .

Earle v. National Metallurgic Co.

77 N.J. Eq. 17 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 13, 1910

Emery, V. C. … Hackensack Water Co. v. DeKay (Court of Errors and Appeals, 1883), 36 N. J. Eq. (9 Stew.) 548, 553; Reed v. Helois Carbide, &c., Co. (Vice-Chancellor Pitney, 1902), 64 N. J. Eq. (19 Dick.) 231, 238; Schultze v.

Olden v. Hubbard

34 N.J. Eq. 85 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1881

In Maxwell v. … Browne, 3 Bro. C.

Hyams v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.

82 N.J. Eq. 507 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 25, 1913

Howell, V. C. … Murray v. Beattie Manufacturing Co., 79 N. J. Eq. (9 Buch.) 604; Blanchard v. Prudential Insurance Co., 80 N. J. Eq. (10 Buch.) 209.

Perlman v. Perlman

113 N.J. Eq. 3 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 21, 1933

The provision of our statute above quoted has been given force and effect in Jung v. Jung, 85 N.J. Eq. 372 ; Lister v. Lister, supra; Hollingshead v. Hollingshead, 91 N.J. Eq. 261 ; Sechler v. Sechler, 94 N.J. … Eq. 47 ; Garabrant v. Garabrant, 95 N.J. Eq. 136 ; Feickert v. Feickert, 98 N.J. Eq. 444 .

Doremus v. Mayor of Paterson

70 N.J. Eq. 296 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 30, 1905

Stone metz Printers Co. v. Brown & Co., 46 Fed. Rep. 851. … Leslie v. Leslie, 50 N. J. Eq. (5 Dick.) 155; Doane & Jones Lumber Co. v. Essex Building and Land Co., 59 N. J. Eq. (14 Dick.) 142.

McCarter v. Pitman, Glassboro & Clayton Gas Co.

74 N.J. Eq. 255 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 7, 1908

The same view is there taken as to the effect of that statute before the provision was added touching the conclusive force of the judgment of the board of directors as to values. Bickley v. Schlag, 46 N. J. … As is said in Bickley v.

Sheen v. Sheen

126 N.J. Eq. 132 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Aug 24, 1939

The case of Noice v. Schnell, 101 N.J. Eq. 252 (at p. 257 ); 137 Atl. … In Attorney-General v. Whorwood, 1 Ves.

Wendt v. Bergen Savings Bank

131 N.J. Eq. 380 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 13, 1942

On the day last aforesaid, the Savings Bank, through its board of managers, transferred its assets and its good will to the Trust Company. … Cole v. Brandle, 127 N.J. Eq. 31 ; 11 Atl. Rep. 2d 255; Phair v. Melosh, 125 N.J. Eq. 497 ; 6 Atl. Rep. 2d 491; affirmed, 127 N.J. Eq. 15 ; 11 Atl. Rep. 2d 32; Hinners v. Banville, 114 N.J. Eq. 348 ; 168 Atl.

In re the appeal from Atlantic county orphans court admitting to probate a certain paper-writing of the last will and testament of Allen

107 N.J. Eq. 561 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 5, 1930

V. Lewis and Lewis Starr, esquires, proctors *562 for proponent, $10,000, together with their costs and expenses amounting to $826.05; to Allen B. … Endicott, esquire, proctor for the caveator, $10,000, together with his costs and expenses amounting to $1,105.67; to William Elmer Brown, Jr., esquire, proctor for Thomas Allen et al., “who were cited as legatees under a

Reeves v. Morgan

48 N.J. Eq. 415 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1891

Lord Thurlow, in Atkinson v. Leonard, 3 Brown Ch. … But Perkins v.