Case law

Schotte v. Board of Commissioners

9 N.J. Misc. 310 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 13, 1931

Ehrhardt v. Board of Adjustment

6 N.J. Misc. 560 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 9, 1928

An appeal was taken on the same day to the board of adjustment and the appeal was determined by that board on the 27th of October, 1927. … of the board clearly does.

Morales v. Board of Adjustment

6 N.J. Misc. 969 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 18, 1928

This is an application for a certiorari to review the decision of the board of adjustment of the city of Passaic, dated July 31st, 1928, reversing the decision of the supervisor of buildings, refusing a permit to use premises … The writ is asked for on the ground that the board of adjustment was without jurisdictioon to hear the appeal under the act Pamph.

Board of Pharmacy v. Stockton

6 N.J. Misc. 1109 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 30, 1928

.” *1111 This, with the record of the case under the case of State Board of Medical Examiners v. Buettel, 102 N. J. L. 74, was ample proof to identify the defendants.

Kienzlan v. Board of Education

102 N.J. Eq. 334 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 6, 1928

Board of Health v. Cohen

88 N.J.L. 369 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 15, 1915

Antonelli v. Board of Commissioners

128 N.J.L. 531 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 10, 1942

Tideman v. Board of Commissioners

122 N.J.L. 145 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 24, 1939

By resolution, dated June 7th, 1938, the Board of Commissioners created a local assistance board, under the provisions of chapter 123 of the laws of 1938. Members of such board were appointed and, on organization, Mrs. … “She was not discharged by the Board of Commissioners on September 13th, 1938.”

Bourgeois v. Board of Health

77 N.J.L. 162 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 9, 1908

Board of Health v. Cattell, 44 Vroom 516 . The principal point argued is that as the act (Pamph. … of Health v.

Prince v. Board of Adjustment

3 N.J. Misc. 547 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 18, 1925

This feature of these ordinances has so frequently been passed upon by this court as.not to require citation of authority other than that of Ignaciunas v. Nutley, 2 N. J. Adv. R. 852. … The judgment of the board of adjustment must be set aside, with costs.

Pugsley v. Board of Education

3 N.J. Misc. 1135 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 2, 1925

The board of education of Mine Hill township called for bids for the work and materials for the construction of an addition to the Mine Hill School House, according to plans' and specifications, comprehending, among others … The specifications call for stucco finish, and this alternate speaks of a stipled finish, which, if the board should desire, would be $550 more.

Nagengast v. Board of Education

6 N.J. Misc. 703 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 2, 1928

Lipman v. Board of Education

6 N.J. Misc. 706 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 2, 1928

Clarence Haley v. Board of Review

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 17, 2021

And, unlike the claimant in Fennell v. Board of Review, 297 N.J. Super. 319 (App. … The Board further argues that the Appellate Division decision does not conflict with DeLorenzo v. Board of Review, 100 N.J. Super. 473, 476 (App.

Becker v. Board of Commissioners

11 N.J. Misc. 902 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 16, 1933

This is an application by the prosecutor, claiming to be a citizen and taxpayer of Newark, for a writ of certiorari to review six resolutions passed by the board of commissioners of the city subsequent to the adoption of

Battaglia v. Union County Welfare Board

88 N.J. 48 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 16, 1981

See Board of Regents v. … See Mirabella v. Board of Elections, 507 F.Supp. 338 (S.D.N.Y.1980), and Catterson v. Caso, 472 F.Supp. 833 (E.D.N.Y.1979).

Nigro v. Planning Board

121 N.J. 627 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 20, 1990

State v. Board of Health

50 N.J.L. 85 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1887

This action was brought before a police justice at the city of Newark to recover a penalty for the violation of an ordinance of the board of health under act of 1886. Pamph. L„ p. 289, § 23. … Does the grant of jurisdiction to police justices to try in a summary way a violation of an ordinance of the board of health carry with it by implication the right of appeal to the Common Pleas?

Kirkpatrick v. State Board of Assessors

57 N.J.L. 53 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1894

New Jersey Southern Railroad Co. v. Railroad Commissioners, 12 Vroom 235 . This conclusion disposes of all the reasons relied on for setting-aside this assessment, except the first. … The facts set out in the state of the case agreed on show that this company was a manufacturing company carrying on business in this state, within the decision of Phonograph Company v. Board of Assessors, 25 Vroom 430 .

State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

63 N.J.L. 155 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 6, 1898

Loweree v. Newark, 9 Vroom 151 ; Wheeler v. Essex Public Road Board, 10 Id. 291 . … Such declarations in Swayze v. New Jersey Midland Railway Co., 7 Vroom 295 , 299; Butler v. Sewer Commissioners, 10 Id. 665, 669, and Crater v.