Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.05s
6 N.J. Misc. 801 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 27, 1928
Cited 0 timesPublishedBaldwin v. Board of Adjustment
6 N.J. Misc. 802 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 27, 1928
Under this writ we are asked to reverse the judgment of the board of adjustment of the city of East Orange, refusing to prosecutor a permit to erect an apartment house. Koplin v. South Orange, 6 N. J. Mis. … R. 489, and Bellofatto et al. v. Montclair, Ibid. 512, are controlling and the judgment under review is affirmed and the writ dismissed, with costs.
Cited 0 timesPublished6 N.J. Misc. 963 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 11, 1928
Stat., p. 4805) the city scheme may be adopted by referendum in a town, township or borough, and will then be operative therein, as in fact was the situation in Kay v. Board, &c., of Kearny, 83 N. J. … L. 551, 553, and in Scola v. Board, &c., of Montclair, 77 Id. 73, 75. Both Kearny and Montclair were towns, and had adopted the city scheme.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJohnson v. Board of Commissioners
33 N.J. Eq. 621 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1881
Cited 0 timesPublishedCoffey v. Board of Commissioners
130 N.J.L. 582 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 21, 1943
This writ brings up for .review the “proceedings relating to a certain ordinance known as Ordinance No. 1 * * * adopted by the Board of Commissioners of the City of Atlantic City and entitled £An ordinance fixing the salary … The ordinance, adopted at a Board meeting on January 21st, 1943, fixes the salary of the Registrar of Vital Statistics of Atlantic City at $1,960 per year, payable in semi-monthly installments.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBuchholtz v. Board of Adjustment
7 N.J. Misc. 512 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 21, 1929
The prosecutors file four reasons for setting aside the order or judgment of the board of adjustment. First. … The result we have reached is the order or judgment of the board of adjustment is affirmed and the writ of certiorari is- dismissed, with costs.
Cited 0 timesPublished19 N.J. 441 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 31, 1955
Cited 0 timesPublished8 N.J. Misc. 625 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 2, 1930
minutes of the board relating to John 0. … Lindsley, relator, v. Board of Managers of the New Jersey State Prison, respondent, decided at this term of court, were argued on the samé briefs.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState v. Board of Excise Commissioners
56 N.J.L. 411 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1894
Section '9 of the ordinances of the excise board forbids the granting of a license in such case. In Leigh v. … Nolan, 17 Vroom 87 ; Austin v. Atlantic City, 19 Id. 118 . Persons opposed to this license had a right to suppose that the board would hear it in the orderly way, according to its. own rules.
Cited 7 timesPublishedLinbarger v. Board of Education
83 N.J.L. 446 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 18, 1912
Montrale v. People's Bank, 45 Vroom 464 . The sixteenth section of that act (Comp. … The case of Montvale v. People’s Bank, supra, therefore, controls that now under consideration, so far as the question of- delivery is concerned, and the judgment under review must be affirmed.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSchragger v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
58 N.J. 274 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 10, 1971
See Bergen County Sewer Authority v. Little Ferry, 5 N. J. 548, 552 (1950); Ross v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Essex County, 69 N. J. L. 291 (E. & A. 1903); New Jersey Zinc Co. v. … Sussex County Board of Equalization of *279 Taxes, 70 N. J. L. 186 (Sup. Ct. 1903); State v. Wildwood, 83 N. J. L. 188 (Sup. Ct. 1912); Murray v. Murray, 7 N. J. Super. 549 (Law Div. 1950).
Cited 14 timesPublished10 N.J. Misc. 641 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 9, 1932
The only question raised on this record is whether or not the judge should have directed a verdict for the state board. … We think the only rational inference to be drawn from the evidence in this case was that these articles were medicines, and that required the direction of a verdict for the state board.
Cited 2 timesPublished127 N.J. 244 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 18, 1992
The Court is satisfied that the enactment of S. 3361, L. 1991, c. 477, has resolved for the future the underlying substantive issue of the applicability of public-bidding laws to certain board of education lease-purchase … Agency v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBozza v. Board of Commissioners
7 N.J. Misc. 287 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 18, 1929
instance,' why a writ of certiorari should not be allowed for a review of an ordinance passed by the board of commissioners of the city of Perth Amboy, on the 19th day of September, 1928, which rule to show cause, by stipulation … This court in Silvester v. Mayor and Council of the Borough of Princeton, 5 N. J. Adv.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCheeseman v. Board of Education
1 N.J. Misc. 318 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 5, 1923
An appeal was then taken by Miss Cheeseman to the state board of education. The state board of education held that the transfer was legal and that Miss Cheese-man was guilty of insubordination and properly dismissed. … The Gloucester city board of education had the power of transfer (section 68, School law, Comp. Stat., p. 4744).
Cited 2 timesPublishedBoard of Commissioners v. Horner
48 N.J.L. 441 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1886
State, Pancoast, pros., v. Troth, 5 Vroom 377 . … In Callahan v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedHadley v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
73 N.J.L. 197 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 28, 1906
The board of freeholders of Passaic county condemned certain property of Mrs. … National Docks, &c., Co. v. United Companies, 24 Vroom 217 ; Paterson and Newark Railroad Co. v. Newark, 32 Id. 80. The judgment under review should be affirmed.
Cited 5 timesPublished86 N.J.L. 95 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 4, 1914
L’Hote v. New Orleans, 177 U. S. 587 . *97 This court, in the comparatively recent case of Borden’s Milk Co. v. Board of Health of Montclair, 81 N. J. … In Schwartz Brothers v. Board of Health of Jersey City, 84 N. J.
Cited 2 timesPublishedState v. Board of Public Works
57 N.J.L. 313 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1894
State v. Hutchinson, 5 Halst. 242; State v. Clothier, 1 Vroom, 351 . … This was reaffirmed in the case of The State v. David Cake et al., 4 Zab. 516.
Cited 5 timesPublishedNew York Trap Rock Co. v. Brown
61 N.J.L. 536 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1898
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna