Case law

Board of Fire Commissioners v. Lyon

53 N.J.L. 632 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1891

A similar statute relating to police departments in cities was held to be constitutional, in its provision relating to the *634 removal of officers, in the case of New Brunswick v. Fitzgerald, 19 Vroom 456; S. … For reversal—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon,, Knapp, Magie, Reed, Scudder, Brown, Clement;, Smith, Whitaker. 11.

Carroll v. State Board of Education

8 N.J. Misc. 859 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 22, 1930

This provision was not exercised by either party under the first two contracts but was exercised by the board of education of Matawan under the third contract by that board giving notice to the prosecutrix on July 15th, 1929 … Wooley v. Hendrickson, 13 N. J. L. 14 (at p. 20). We think the Tenure act, Pamph.

Voight v. Board of Excise Commissioners

59 N.J.L. 358 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1896

Lantz v. Hightstown, 17 Vroorn 102, 107; Metropolitan Board of Excise v. Barrie, 34 N. Y. 657 ; 11 Am. & Eng. Encycl. L. 634. … As was said by the Court of Appeals of New York, in People v. Commissioners of Police, 59 N.

Lang v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

160 N.J. 41 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 19, 1999

See Brandon v. … In Ward v.

Hallman v. State Parole Board

46 N.J. 279 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 24, 1966

In this proceeding Hallman attacked the order of the State Parole Board revoking his parole and recommitting him to prison.

Board of Education v. Murnick

111 N.J. 625 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 21, 1988

State v. Board of Police Commissioners

56 N.J.L. 258 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1893

Ayers v. Newark, 20 Vroom 170 , 175. The board had power to try the chief of police, and if he had been guilty of misconduct it had power to remove him from -office. … The prosecutor had charges alleged against him in writing, signed by two of the board. This will be sustained under the authority of Ayers v. Newark, 20 Vroom 172 .

State v. Board of Commissioners

46 N.J.L. 93 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1884

In this action the board of commissioners of appeal, &c., performed the duty required of them, and their action cannot thus be objected to. *97 In Pierson v. … In such case the board may make a proper increase, but their action must be on notice to the parties to be affected. State, Trash, pros., v. Corrigan, 8 Vroom 264 ; State, Evans, pros., v.

Vanbueren v. Board of Commissioners

9 N.J. Misc. 187 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 27, 1931

Jewett v. Bowman, 27 N. J. Eq. 275. Our statute is almost an exact copy of 29 Car. II., ch. 7, §6. … The King v. Myers, 1 T. R. 265. Actions for penalties under municipal ordinances have, in this state, been held qui tarn actions, and, therefore, civil proceedings. Brophy v. Perth Amboy, 44 N. J. L. 217.

State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

63 N.J.L. 155 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 6, 1898

Loweree v. Newark, 9 Vroom 151 ; Wheeler v. Essex Public Road Board, 10 Id. 291 . … Such declarations in Swayze v. New Jersey Midland Railway Co., 7 Vroom 295 , 299; Butler v. Sewer Commissioners, 10 Id. 665, 669, and Crater v.

McCully v. Board of Education

63 N.J.L. 18 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 27, 1899

Rader v. Township of Union, 10 Vroom 509 ; Little v. Township of Union, 11 Id. 397; Township of Union v. Rader , 12 Id. 617 ; Same v. Same, 16 Id. 182; Neilson v. Newark, 20 Id. 246. … remedy against the old board.

Resciniti v. Board Commissioners of Belleville

117 N.J.L. 1 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 22, 1936

Rep. 683 (mandamus denied to license hotel on grounds that facts were not clear); Doben v. Board of Health of the City of Paterson, 3 N. J. Mis. R. 38; 127 Atl. … Rep. 517 ; De Roos v. Chapman, supra (at p. 8 of 106 N. J.

Watkins v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

73 N.J.L. 213 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 26, 1906

Freeholders v. Strader, 3 Harr. 108 ; Livermore v. Freeholders , 5 Dutcher 245; Pray v. Jersey City, 3 Vroom 394 . … Condict v. Jersey City, 17 Vroom 157 ; Wild v. Paterson, 18 Id. 406; see, also, Tomlin v. Hildreth, 36 Id. 438.

Weider v. Board Education, High Bridge

112 N.J.L. 289 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 31, 1934

The borough board, in terminating Mrs. … The evidence discloses a public economy (Reck v. Board of Commissioners of North Bergen, 110 N. J. L. 173, 177; Rath v. Bayonne, 10 N. J. Mis. R. 962), but not a discrimination against the prosecutrix.

Nicholson v. Board of Education

83 N.J.L. 36 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 21, 1912

pointed out in State v. … Rogers, 27 Vroom 480 , and in Gulnac v.

Freeman v. Board of Registry

76 N.J.L. 83 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 30, 1907

In defence of the board it is said that it is now impossible-for them to make such a statement as the law requires. … Over sixty had Freeman’s name written in the same handwriting, and the case is stronger in that respect than Hackett v.

State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

58 N.J.L. 531 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1896

The writ of certiorari brings into this court for review the action of the jail inspection committee of the board of chosen freeholders of Essex county, removing the prosecutor from his position as keeper or guard in the … The distinction between those positions which are entitled to the protection of what are commonly known as the “ veteran acts ” and mere employments under the state, city or county, is pointed out in the case of Lewis v.

State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

58 N.J.L. 319 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1895

The only proceedings of the board of chosen freeholders, appointing Mr. … In Lewis v.

Hoffmeir v. Board of Health

4 N.J. Misc. 839 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 7, 1926

Ott v. Board of Education

78 N.J. 336 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 19, 1978