Case law

Harz v. Borough of Spring Lake

234 N.J. 317 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 26, 2018

V. A. … See Rosenberg v.

Plunkett v. Board of Pension Commissioners

113 N.J.L. 230 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 24, 1934

The applicant invokes the jurisdiction of this court to review, by certiorari, a resolution of the Board of Pension Commissioners of the city of Hoboken, denying his petition for a pension from the fund created under the … Bennett v. Lee, 104 N. J. L. 453. Until the particular event should happen upon which the money, or a part of it, was to be paid, there was no vested right in the member to such payment. Pennie v. Reis, 132 U.

Phelps v. State Board of Education

115 N.J.L. 310 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 26, 1935

See Vroom v. Board of Education. 79 N. J. L. 46. We are clear that the legislature could repeal the act of 1909. If it could repeal it, it can modify it as thought best, and that it did by the act of 1933. … The judgments and decisions of the state board under review will be affirmed, with costs.

State v. Board of Public Works

57 N.J.L. 580 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1895

Coughlin, v. Gleason, 121 N. Y. 631 ; Gunning Gravel Co. v. New Orleans, 13 So. Rep. 182 . … Craft v. Smith, 6 Vroom 302 ; Jeffrey v. Owen, 12 Id. 260; Overseer of Madison v. Overseer of Monroe, 13 Id. 493; Britton v. McDonald, 14 Id. 591; Lush v. Foster, 15 Id. 378; Sloan v. Wills, Id. 584; Roehers v.

Board of Fire Commissioners v. Lyon

53 N.J.L. 632 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1891

A similar statute relating to police departments in cities was held to be constitutional, in its provision relating to the *634 removal of officers, in the case of New Brunswick v. Fitzgerald, 19 Vroom 456; S. … For reversal—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon,, Knapp, Magie, Reed, Scudder, Brown, Clement;, Smith, Whitaker. 11.

White v. Violent Crimes Compensation Board

76 N.J. 368 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 25, 1978

In Giacobbe v. … . 3 See Soriano v.

McFeely v. Board of Pension Commissioners

1 N.J. 212 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 13, 1948

L. 367 (E. & A. 1940,); Potts v. Board of Adjustment of Princeton, 133 N. J. L. 230 (Sup. Ct. 1945,); Deweese v. Smith, 106 Fed. 438 (C. C. A. 1901). … Hyman v. Muller, 1 N. J. 124 (Sup. Ct. 1948); State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Co., 118 N. J. Eq. 504 (E. & A. 1935).

State v. Board of Police Commissioners

56 N.J.L. 258 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1893

Ayers v. Newark, 20 Vroom 170 , 175. The board had power to try the chief of police, and if he had been guilty of misconduct it had power to remove him from -office. … The prosecutor had charges alleged against him in writing, signed by two of the board. This will be sustained under the authority of Ayers v. Newark, 20 Vroom 172 .

Wilson v. Board of Commissioners

94 N.J.L. 119 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 1, 1920

To sustain this contention he cites the eases of Dufford v. Nolan, 46 N. J. L. 87, and Austin v. Atlantic City, 48 Id. 118. … The case on this point is similar to that of Dufford v. Hoagland, reported sub nom. Dufford v. Nolan, supra (at p. 92).

State v. Board of Commissioners

46 N.J.L. 93 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1884

In this action the board of commissioners of appeal, &c., performed the duty required of them, and their action cannot thus be objected to. *97 In Pierson v. … In such case the board may make a proper increase, but their action must be on notice to the parties to be affected. State, Trash, pros., v. Corrigan, 8 Vroom 264 ; State, Evans, pros., v.

Vanbueren v. Board of Commissioners

9 N.J. Misc. 187 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 27, 1931

Jewett v. Bowman, 27 N. J. Eq. 275. Our statute is almost an exact copy of 29 Car. II., ch. 7, §6. … The King v. Myers, 1 T. R. 265. Actions for penalties under municipal ordinances have, in this state, been held qui tarn actions, and, therefore, civil proceedings. Brophy v. Perth Amboy, 44 N. J. L. 217.

Board of Trustees of Public Employees' Retirement System v. Board of Freeholders

47 N.J. 132 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 2, 1966

The issue is whether the County of Warren is liable for certain contributions demanded by the Board of Trustees of the Public Employees’ Retirement System with respect to a supervisor of official court reporters for Passaic … Super. 187 (Law Div. 1965), and we certified the appeal of the Board of Trustees before the Appellate Division heard it.

Applestein v. United Board & Carton Corp.

35 N.J. 343 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 30, 1961

Trustees of Princeton University v. Trust Co. of N. J., 22 N. J. 587, at p. 598 (1956); O’Loughlin v. O’Loughlin, 6 N. … See Massari v. Einsiedler, 6 N. J. 303 (1951); Ajamian v. Schlanger, 14 N. J. 483 (1954); Thatcher v. Jerry O’Mahony, Inc., 39 N. J. Super. 330 (App. Div. 1956); Vacca v. Stika, 21 N. J. 471 (1956).

Nicholson v. Board of Education

83 N.J.L. 36 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 21, 1912

pointed out in State v. … Rogers, 27 Vroom 480 , and in Gulnac v.

Evans v. Board of Education

13 N.J. Misc. 506 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 26, 1935

Skladzien v. Board of Education of Bayonne, supra. It is not material to the determination of this case that the solicitor of a board of education be regarded as an officer. … State, Hoxsey, Pros., v. Paterson, 40 N. J. L. *508 186. His term of office, as before noted, was either fixed at one year by the resolution creating the office or by law. The Supreme Court held in Board of Education v.

Astley v. Board of Commissioners

98 N.J.L. 251 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1922

In the case of Attorney-General v. McKelvey, 78 N. J. … Justice Parker in Mount v. Howell, 85 Id. 487, 489.

Ott v. Board of Education

78 N.J. 336 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 19, 1978

Hoffmeir v. Board of Health

4 N.J. Misc. 839 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 7, 1926

Mahnken v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

62 N.J.L. 404 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 14, 1898

Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. Righter, 13 Vroom 180 ; Central Railroad Co. v. Moore, 4 Zab. 824; Durant v. Palmer, 5 Dutcher 544; Houston v. Traphagen, 18 Vroom 23 ; Comben v. Belleville Stone Co., 30 Id. 226 ; Whart. … In Durant v.

Local Board of Health v. Eastlack

68 N.J.L. 585 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 10, 1902

No nuisance existed on the premises until a case of small-pox broke out in a member of the tenant's family, whose excretions were emptied into the cesspool,'by the direction of the defendant board of health, who also had … The board of health was entirely without power to abrogate this legal rule by authorizing the prosecutor to come and clean out the closet. The judgment is set aside, with costs.