Case law

Sayre v. Board of Excise

81 N.J.L. 79 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 10, 1911

The power conferred upon the board of excise commissioners is the same as conferred upon the boards of commissioners under the act of 1902. Pamph. L., p. 628. It was held, in Sexton v. … Board of Excise Commissioners, 47 Vroom 102 , that the latter boards in granting licenses were limited by the provisions of the Inn and Tavern act. The same doctrine was applied in the case of Reed v.

George v. Board of Excise

74 N.J.L. 816 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 17, 1907

Moran v. Jersey City, 29 Vroom 653 ; Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Co. v. Newark, 34 Id. 310; Morris & Cummings Dredging Co. v. Jersey City , 35 Id. 587; Suburban Land Co. v. … Vailsburg, 39 Id. 311; Yellow Pine Co. v. Board of Assessors, 43 Id. 182. The testimony before the Supreme Court was competent and certainly did not compel any other conclusion than that reached by the court.

Hall v. Board of Education

125 N.J. 299 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 30, 1991

See, e.g., Michaels v. Brookchester, Inc., 26 N.J. 379, 388 , 140 A.2d 199 *306 (1958); The Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers and Cosmetologists’ Int’l Union of Am. v. … Kennedy v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 16 N.J. 280, 294 , 108 A.2d 409 (1954); Board of Educ. v. Woodstown-Pilesgrove Regional Educ.

Board of Health v. Werner

67 N.J.L. 103 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 11, 1901

Constructing the work “without their having first filed with the secretary of the board of health a plan thereof, signed by the owner.” Second. … Because they constructed the work “without the approval of the board of health being first secured therefor.”

State v. Board of Excise

57 N.J.L. 603 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1895

But, assuming that the board made a mistake, it does not appear that the mistake was induced by any fraudulent conduct of the petitioner. It was an error attributable to infirmity of judgment in the board. … But the power of the board itself to revoke is limited to instances where the license has been fraudulently procured or where the statute has expressly conferred the power of revocation. Lantz v.

Rose v. Board of Review

199 N.J. 515 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 8, 2009

973 A.2d 383 (2009) 199 N.J. 515 ROSE v. BOARD OF REVIEW. C-896 September Term 2008, 63,689 Supreme Court of New Jersey. May 8, 2009. Petition for certification. Denied.

PARFITT v. Board of Review

199 N.J. 540 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 3, 2009

973 A.2d 944 (2009) 199 N.J. 540 PARFITT v. BOARD OF REVIEW. C-982 September Term 2008, 63,835 Supreme Court of New Jersey. June 3, 2009. Petition for certification. Denied.

Moser v. Board of Commissioners

10 N.J. Misc. 315 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 2, 1932

Paddock v. Hudson Tax Board, 82 N. J. L. 360; Harker v. Bayonne, 85 Id. 176; Colgarry v. Water Commissioners, Ibid. 583; Buckley v. Guttenberg, 87 Id. 434. The purpose of the change here was clearly shown to be economy. … The action of the board of commissioners is affirmed, andi the writ dismissed, with costs.

Keller v. Board of Commissioners

6 N.J. Misc. 1092 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 30, 1928

Morgan v. Board of Commissioners of Collingswood, 6 N. J. Adv. R. 84. … English v. City of Asbury Park, 115 Atl. Rep. 64 .

Keels v. Board of Review

198 N.J. 311 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 4, 2009

966 A.2d 1078 (2009) 198 N.J. 311 KEELS v. BOARD OF REVIEW. Supreme Court of New Jersey. February 4, 2009. Petition for certification. Denied.

Board of Education v. Board of Education

68 N.J.L. 415 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1902

Patterson v. Board of Education

11 N.J. Misc. 179 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 3, 1933

It appears that the Trenton board of education provides a course in swimming in the new Central high school.

Pietrunti v. Board of Education

65 N.J. 573 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 22, 1974

Rosenberg v. Board of Commissioners

137 N.J.L. 505 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 6, 1948

In Lipkin v. Duffy, 119 N. J. … To the same effect are Phillips v. East Paterson, 134 N. J. L. 161, and Phillips v. Belleville, 135 Id. 271.

Nesbitt v. Board of Managers

10 N.J. Misc. 19 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 10, 1931

In the case of Lodor v. Baker, Arnold & Co., 39 N. J. L. 49, the court, speaking through Mr. … See, also, American Dock, &c., Co. v. Trustees of Public Schools, 32 N. J. Eq. 428. Both these cases were cited with approval as late as 1920, by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan, in Curtis & Hill & Co. v.

Board of Health v. Vandruens

77 N.J.L. 443 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 23, 1909

State v. Spear, 34 Vroom 179 ; Shivers v. Newton, 16 Id. 469. … Steward v. Sears, 7 Vroom 173 ; Butts v. French, 13 Id. 397.

Sperling v. Board of Review

156 N.J. 466 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 11, 1998

Wendel v. Board of Education

76 N.J.L. 499 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1908

shall then fix and determine the amount necessary, and certify the same to the board of education, and also to the common council, or other financial board of the city, and that such financial board may include it in its … Winters v. Telephone *502 Co., 22 Vroom 83 .

Board of Pharmacy v. Abramoff

6 N.J. Misc. 437 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 1, 1928

State Board v. Buettel, 131 Atl. Rep. 89 ; 3 N. J. Adv. R. 1860; State Board v. Roach, 132 Atl. Rep. 86 ; 4 N. J. Adv. R. 417; State Board v. Gese, 132 Atl. Rep. 926 ; 5 N. J. Adv. R. 373. … This practice was followed, and correctly, in Harman v. Board, 67 N. J. L. 117. Por these reasons, and on the merits, the present writ will be dismissed.

Keller v. Board of Commissioners

7 N.J. Misc. 977 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 7, 1929