Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.80s
79 N.J. 476 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 16, 1979
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text70 N.J. 512 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 4, 1976
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textLaBeaume v. Board of Adjustment
68 N.J. 147 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 6, 1975
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text64 N.J. 505 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 26, 1974
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textMindlin v. Board of Adjustment
62 N.J. 71 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 21, 1972
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text82 N.J.L. 610 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 26, 1912
Rep. 67, In Zimmerman v. … In Daab v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedPerrella v. Board of Education
50 N.J. 292 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 19, 1967
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text11 N.J. 327 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 2, 1953
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text11 N.J. 328 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 2, 1953
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textGoebelbecker v. Board of Review
29 N.J. 354 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 23, 1959
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text34 N.J. 323 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 13, 1961
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textRichards v. Board of Education
36 N.J. 305 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 29, 1962
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text228 N.J. 56 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 14, 2016
Cited 0 timesPublished51 N.J.L. 114 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1888
Rem., § 30; Ex parte Crane, 5 Pet. 190 ; Board of Liquidations v. McComb, 92. U. S. 531; State v. Rahway, 4 Vroom 110 ; Hugg v. Camden, 10 Id. 620; 2 Dill. Mun. Corp. 832-838. … Brown for the-position of member of the township committee. It is argued that the election, if called, must be open to all candidates, and. for voters to choose whom they will for the office.
Cited 2 timesPublished85 N.J.L. 520 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 25, 1914
L., p. 506) all school districts in each township in the state were consolidated into one to ho governed by a single board of education in place of district boards of trustees. … Smith, Exr., v. Tucker, 2 Harr. 83 . The relator is entitled to an alternative writ of mandamus, and to that extent the rule is made absolute.
Cited 3 timesPublished74 N.J.L. 638 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 4, 1907
The board of education of the district thereupon removed the order and the proceedings thereunder by writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court. … The case shows that the defendant below based.his action in visiting upon the school district the penalty denoted in his order upon the alleged refusal of its board of education “to provide suitable school facilities and
Cited 6 timesPublishedState ex rel. Board of Education v. Board of Council
52 N.J.L. 69 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1889
of education, and to be paid out only on a warrant signed by the president of said board.” … Now, it is quite clear from section 52, above mentioned, that the board of council have no control whatever over the school *72 fund.
Cited 2 timesPublished227 N.J. 26 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 15, 2016
Cited 0 timesPublished212 N.J. 564 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 14, 2011
ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted, and the judgment is summarily reversed and the matter is remanded to the Board of Trustees of the PFRS to decide the case on the *565 merits.
Cited 1 timesPublished48 N.J. 121 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 7, 1966
See also: Sarja v. Iron Range Resources & Rehabilitation, Minn., 144 N. W. 2d 377 (1966).
Cited 10 timesPublished
Ask Donna