Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnj

10,000+ results

0.47s

  • Brown v. Abbott

    16 N.J.L. 319 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1838

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Robertson v. Brown

    7 N.J. Misc. 413 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 19, 1929

    The defendant Cuba Brown was operating an auto truck belonging to the defendant Harry T. Theobold, which collided-"with, the plaintiff’s bicycle, causing the injuries complained of.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Keim v. Brown

    121 N.J. Eq. 86 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 5, 1936

    Appellants rely upon the decision of this court in Rose v. Jerome Harvey Development Co., 113 N. J. … Citing Vanderbilt v. Kipp, 110 N. J. Eq. 10.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Klein

    135 N.J.L. 19 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 12, 1946

    The first complaint was that Brown, on February 25th, 1945, kept pigs within the limits of the borough without having first procured a permit from the Board of Health. … The second complaint charged that Brown on that day kept in excess of seven pigs. The first attack is upon the conviction under the second complaint.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lone v. Brown

    103 N.J. 480 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 11, 1986

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Simandl

    93 N.J. Eq. 225 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 30, 1921

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    76 N.J.L. 479 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 16, 1908

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Bissett

    21 N.J.L. 46 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 15, 1847

    Brown v. Bissett, 1 Zab. 273; Allen & Vail v. Agnew, 4 Zab. 444-446-447; Linford v. Linford & Lent, 4 Dutch. 116.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Merritt v. Brown

    21 N.J. Eq. 401 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1869

    In Combs v. Little, 3 Green’s Ch. 310, the statute of frauds was not pleaded, and in that case, as also in Marlatt v. Warwick, 4 C. E. … Brown for any risks he might run himself by doing this favor to Mr. Merritt. This is my understanding of it; I understood it from Mr. Brown, as my conversation was with him.”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    107 N.J. 53 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 16, 1986

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Tonelli v. Board of Education

    185 N.J. 438 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 28, 2005

    The *442 Board countered that our recent decisions in O’Connell v. State, 171 N.J. 484 , 795 A.2d 857 (2002), and Ryan v. … Brown, 37 N.J. 189, 199 , 180 A.2d 136 (1962), it seems to us that the Board is intrinsically distinct from the denominated entities.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Dunn

    50 N.J.L. 111 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1887

    Superintendent v. Heath, 2 McCart. 22; Bower v. Blue Stone Co., 3 Stew. Eq. 171; S. C., 3 Stew. Eq. 340; Shannon v. Hoboken, 10 Stew. Eq. 123; S. C., 10 Stew. Eq. 318; Kirtland v. Moore, 13 Stew. Eq. 106. … Stebbins v. Walker, 2 Green 90; Cox v. Marlatt, 7 Vroom 389 ; Belton v. Gibbons, 7 Halst. 76; Sloan v. Sommers, 2 Green 509; Terney v. Wilson, 16 Vroom 282 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Atlantic City v. Brown

    71 N.J.L. 81 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 13, 1904

    In the case of Fonsler v. Atlantic City, 41 Vroom 125 , this court conceded that Atlantic City had power to pass section 2 of the ordinance. … In Fonsler v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Bowman v. Brown

    87 N.J. Eq. 363 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 5, 1917

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Erie Railroad

    87 N.J.L. 487 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 25, 1914

    The enacting clause of a statute may be extended by the preamble, but cannot he restrained by it. 36 Cyc. 1132; Den v. Urison, 2 N. J. L. *212, 224; James v. Dubois, 16 Id. 285; Quackenbush v. State, 57 Id. 18, 21. … Stat. 82; 1 Kent 460; Den v. Dubois, 1 Harr. 285 , 295.”

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Morton

    71 N.J.L. 26 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 13, 1904

    On September 12th, 1901, the board of directors of the company passed a resolution levying a call of $10 per share on the holders of the preferred stock of record on September 16th, 1901, $10 per share having previously been … Ellerman v. Chicago Junction Railroad Co., 4 Dick. Ch. Rep. 217; Loewenthal v. Rubber Co., 7 Id. 440; Clearwater v. Meredith, 1 Wall. 25, 40 ; Oregon Railroad Co. v. Oregonian Railroad Co., 130 U. S. 1 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Easton

    30 N.J. Eq. 725 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1879

    R. v. … forfeited by a decree dissolving the order and dismissing the bill), the defendants in that cause presented to the chancellor a petition for the rescinding of an order, granted on the opinion of the vice-chancellor (see Easton v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Lewis

    116 N.J. 477 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 11, 1989

    Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 738 , 103 S.Ct. 1535, 1541 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502, 511 (1973). See also State v. … See Coolidge v.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown-Bilal

    229 N.J. 7 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 1, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Coriell

    50 N.J. Eq. 753 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1893

    The undisputed facts in this ease are these: One Peter V. Conover had married a daughter of one Stephen Brown, senior. Peter V. Conover was indebted to his wife. … Conover, as the administrator of his deceased wife, against the executors of Stephen Brown, senior. The bill prays that the mortgage made by Peter V.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.