Case law

Brown v. Murphy

136 N.J.L. 183 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 12, 1947

Since counsel argued and briefed the Brown case and submitted the Rice case as presenting identical issues for determination, our disposition of the Brown case will be controlling in the Rice case. … Therefore, the taking in this (¡ase was unlawful and in this respect differs from such cases as Haycock v. Jannarone, 99 N. J. L. 183; Gould v. State Highway Commission, 112 N. J. Eq. 389; Goodavage v.

Brady v. Board of Review

152 N.J. 197 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 22, 1997

Charatan v. Board of Review, 200 N.J.Super. 74, 79 , 490 A.2d 352 (App.Div.1985) (citations omitted); see also Greenwood v. … Products Co. v. Board of Review, 106 N.J.Super. 6, 9 , 254 A.2d 111 (App.Div.1969); Zielenski v. Board of Review, 85 N.J.Super. 46, 52 , 203 A.2d 635 (App.Div.1964).

Warren County Vocational Technical School v. Brown & Brown

932 A.2d 28 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 7, 2007

932 A.2d 28 (2007) WARREN COUNTY VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL v. BROWN & BROWN. Supreme Court of New Jersey. September 7, 2007. Petition for certification Denied.

Brown v. Garcia

171 N.J. 332 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 14, 2001

State v. Brown

82 N.J.L. 164 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 27, 1912

The proofs showed that the defendant had been granted a wholesale liquor license by the excise board of the city of Burlington, authorizing him to carry on business under that license at bios. 30 and 32 Delaware avenue, in … Those which were accepted were filled from the common stock in Brown’s place of business, and marked with the name and address of the buyer; some of the packages so marked were then delivered by Brown’s own wagon and driver

Brown v. Terhune

127 N.J.L. 554 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 9, 1942

Cluzel v. Brown

133 N.J. Eq. 156 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 5, 1943

Mott v. Mott, supra; In re Fulper, 99 N. J. Eq. 293. As was said by Mr. Justice Heher for the Court of Errors and Appeals in Peppler v. Roffe, supra, “In invoking the general rule applied in Bankers Trust Co. v. … The facts in the instant case parallel those in Peppler v. Roffe, supra. This court in Croker v. Clegg, 123 N. J. Eq. 332 (at p. 335), adopted the language used in Cowee v. Cornell, 75 N.

Brown v. Howell

68 N.J.L. 292 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 17, 1902

This is the action which was before' the Supreme Court on demurrer in Brown v. Howell, 37 Vroom 25 . … Ilaines v. Price, Spenc. 480; Southard v. Potts, 2 Zab. 278. But beyond this, courts of law do not attempt to give effect to the enactment in personal actions. Thus in Von Arx v.

Brown v. Kelly

42 N.J. 362 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 1, 1964

Sewall v. Fox, 98 N. J. L. 819 (E. & A. 1923); Zemetra v. Fenchel Realty Co., Inc., 134 N. J. L. 358 (Sup. Ct. 1946), affirmed o. b. 135 N. J. L. 205 (E. & A. 1947); Annotation, 82 A. L. R. 2d 998 (1962). … Sewall v. Fox, supra; Taggart v. Bouldin, 111 N. J. L. 464 (E. & A. 1933); Stevenson, “Law of Streets and Sidewalks in New Jersey,” 3 Rutgers L. Rev. 19 , 25 (1949).

Marten v. Brown

80 N.J.L. 143 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 20, 1910

Hasbrouck v. Winkler, 19 Vroom 431 ; Watts v. Frenche, 4 C. E. Gr. 407. But that rule has no application to this ease. … Aschenberg v. Mundy, 47 Vroom 352 .

Brown v. Kremer

124 N.J.L. 242 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 13, 1940

Guild, 114 Id. 472; Brown v. Paterson Central Market Association, 5 N. J. Mis. R. 1035; Craig v. Morgenweck, 15 Id. 637); neither is the payment of compensation by commissions rather than by fixed salary. Dunbaden v. … The Court of Errors and Appeals, in Giroud v.

Brown v. Rowland

141 N.J. Eq. 358 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 29, 1948

Brown v. Christian

97 N.J.L. 56 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 6, 1922

Obart v. Letson, 17 N. J. L. 78. The Attachment act is different from the act relating to trials to determine the ownership of property seized under writs of execution. Under the Attachment act (Comp.

Brown v. Hendrickson

39 N.J.L. 239 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1877

. & P. 28; Bourne v. Benett, 4 Bing. 423; Schoole v. Noble, 1 H. Bl. 23; O’Connor v. Murphy, Id. 657. The same rule prevails in New York. Cooper v. Bigalow, 1 Cowen 206; Miller v. Gilman, 7 Id. 469; Kimball v. … The fact that the judgment was assigned to Brown does not defeat the application of the rule. Miller v. Gilman, 7 Cowen 469; Cooper v. Bigalow, 1 Id. 206.

Brown v. Coxson

119 N.J. Eq. 86 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 9, 1935

Brown v. Combs

29 N.J.L. 36 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1860

Cairns et al., v. … Foster v. Hale, 3 Ves. 696; Steere v. Steere, 5 Johns. Ch. R. 1 — 12.

Brown v. Nevins

84 N.J.L. 215 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 21, 1913

Brown, for work, labor and material putting on roofs on Nos. 64, 66 and 68 Tuers avenue, Jersey City, New Jersey, I hereby agree that the said roofs will remain water tight for a period of ten years, and if by reasonable

Journeay v. Brown

26 N.J.L. 111 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1856

Brown, and stated how it was there. … Chipman v. Sabbaton, 7 Paige 47 . The plaintiffs in certiorari have not, in my opinion, made manifest any error in the order appointing a receiver, and the order ought to be affirmed.

Townsend v. Brown

24 N.J.L. 80 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1853

In the case of Shepherd v. Leverson (Penn. … The question in the case of Arnold v. Mundy (1 Halst. 1) was as to the right of property and possession to the land covered with water where the oysters were planted. In the case of Brinckerhoff v.

State v. Brown

27 N.J.L. 13 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1858

The board of chosen freeholders of the county of Hudson granted to Albert N. … In Barnet v. Johnson, it was held that there were uses to which the company could not apply lands acquired for the use of their canal.