Case law

Romano v. Brown

125 N.J.L. 293 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 10, 1940

Rodgers v. Harelick and Harelick, Inc., 124 N. J. L. 577. … , or of persons interested in the estate for such time as the board may determine.

State v. Brown

957 N.J. 461 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 5, 2008

957 A.2d 1171 (2008) 957 N.J. 461 STATE v. BROWN. C-48 September Term 2008 62,772 Supreme Court of New Jersey. September 5, 2008. Petition for certification. Denied.

Brown v. Murphy

51 N.J.L. 250 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1889

An inspection of the proceedings of the council at the meeting in question shows that the provisions of this ordinance were not then observed, for no evidence of advertisement was produced before the board. … The efficacy of such ordinances to control the manner in which the council shall exercise its powers is asserted without hesitation in Winants v. Bayonne, 15 Vroom 114 , and Volk v. Newark, 18 Id. 117 .

Noice v. Brown

39 N.J.L. 569 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1877

In Hayden v. … Cox v.

Trapp v. Brown

91 N.J.L. 481 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 6, 1918

Sinnickson v. Johnson, 17 N. J. L. 129; Eayre v. Earl, 8 Id. 359; Adler v. Turnbull Company, 57 Id. 62; Westfall v. Dunning, 50 Id. 459. … Hay v. Coveritry, 3 T. R. 83; Corning v. McCulloch, 1 N. Y. 47 .

State v. Brown

932 A.2d 32 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 26, 2007

932 A.2d 32 (2007) STATE v. BROWN. Supreme Court of New Jersey. September 26, 2007. Petition for certification Denied.

Trapp v. Brown

93 N.J.L. 171 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 20, 1919

Brown’s agents in the collection of the rent] to the full amount thereof until the amount of said judgment, with costs, to be taxed are paid.” … Brown until the judgment against her is satisfied; and the same is true with relation to the rents collected or to he collected by her agents.

Brown v. Harris

67 N.J.L. 207 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 11, 1901

Roe v. Meding, 8 Dick. Ch: Rep. 350; Williamson v. Railroad Co., 2 Stew. Eq. 336; Bank v. Sprague, 6 C. E. Gr. 530. … In Newell v.

State v. Brown

932 A.2d 31 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 20, 2007

932 A.2d 31 (2007) STATE v. BROWN. Supreme Court of New Jersey. September 20, 2007. Petition for certification Denied.

State v. Brown

932 A.2d 29 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 7, 2007

932 A.2d 29 (2007) STATE v. BROWN. Supreme Court of New Jersey. September 7, 2007. Petition for certification Denied.

Boyd v. Brown

115 N.J.L. 611 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 24, 1935

The title was taken by Brown in the name of his wife, Ella M. Brown, and the property delivered to her. … Borough of Wrightstown v. Salvation Army, 97 N. J. L. 89, and cases cited.

State v. Brown

41 N.J. 590 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 16, 1964

His argument is that since under the state of proof his failure to testify would have permitted comment against him, State v. Corby, 28 N. … See State v. Holley, 34 N. J. 9, 14 (1961), cert. denied 368 U. S. 854 , 82 S. Ct. 89 , 7 L. Ed. 2d 51 (1961). What we have here is an area in which fair-minded men can disagree.

Noice v. Brown

39 N.J.L. 133 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1876

Myers v. Brown

93 N.J. Eq. 196 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 7, 1921

State v. Brown

53 N.J.L. 162 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1890

This was a ground set up in the case of State, Hoey, v. … The doctrine of the case of The State, Hoey, v.

Moore v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of County of Mercer

39 N.J. 26 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 18, 1962

The individual defendants were elected or appointed officials of the Board of Chosen Freeholders of Mercer County (Board). Two of them were Democratic candidates for re-election as Freeholders at the same election. … It relied on Evening Journal Ass’n v. MacPhail, 45 N. J. Super. 184 (Law Div. 1957). See Moore v. Board of Freeholders of Mercer County, 76 N. J. Super. 42 (Ch. Div. 1962).

Brown v. Vandyke

8 N.J. Eq. 795 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1853

law, and to make a board of directors, the establishment continuing afterwards to be owned and controlled, as it had been before, by Hanson and- Brown, although professedly carried on under the name of the incorporated company … Brown and William It.

Brown v. White

29 N.J.L. 514 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1861

But it was held by the Supreme Court of this state, n. he case of Crane v. … For reversal — The Chancellor, and Judges Brown, Elmer, Haines, Van Dyke, Combs, Cornelison, and Wood.

State v. Brown

103 N.J.L. 519 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 4, 1927

A similar situation was presented in the case of State v. Sing Lee, 94 N. J. L. 266. The indictment in that case charged the offense of carnal abuse committed by the plaintiff in error on a certain date.

Brown v. Murphy

136 N.J.L. 183 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 12, 1947

Since counsel argued and briefed the Brown case and submitted the Rice case as presenting identical issues for determination, our disposition of the Brown case will be controlling in the Rice case. … Therefore, the taking in this (¡ase was unlawful and in this respect differs from such cases as Haycock v. Jannarone, 99 N. J. L. 183; Gould v. State Highway Commission, 112 N. J. Eq. 389; Goodavage v.