Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.36s
16 N.J. Misc. 187 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 6, 1938
Zim *192 merman v. Mathe, 49 N. J. L. 45; 7 Atl. Rep. 674 . This subject was also considered by Goldberger, D. C. J., in Brady v. Board of Education of Carteret, 10 N. J. Mis. R. 358; 158 Atl. … Rep. 747 , and by the commissioner of education and by the state board of education in Board of Education of Borough of Hampton v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBeckworth v. New Jersey State Parole Board
63 N.J. 583 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 16, 1973
Cited 1 timesPublishedNo opinion textLiaskos v. Board of Adjustment
81 N.J. 46 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 13, 1979
Petitions for certification are granted and the matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division for reconsideration in the light of this Court’s opinion in Chirichello v. … Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Borough of Monmouth Beach, 78 N.J. 544 (1979).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Dairy Products Co. v. Milk Control Board
133 N.J.L. 491 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 3, 1945
Brandon v. Montclair, 124 N. J. L. 135; affirmed, 125 Id. 367; Potts v. Board of Adjustment of Princeton, 133 Id. 230. … State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Co., supra.
Cited 6 timesPublishedHomer v. State Board of Education
85 N.J.L. 726 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 29, 1914
Justice Kalisch, in Gowdy v. State Board of Education, in the Supreme Court. 55 Vroom 231 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedBoard of Health v. Schwarz Bros.
86 N.J.L. 170 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1914
Cited 1 timesPublishedSchireson v. State Board of Medical Examiners
129 N.J.L. 203 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 19, 1942
But the proceeding before the board Avas not such an action. In State v. Henson, 66 N. J. … Hawker v. State, supra.
Cited 5 timesPublishedState Board of Medical Examiners v. Plager
118 N.J.L. 434 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 20, 1937
Evening Journal Association v. State Board of Assessors, 47 N. J. L. 36; Hackensack Trust Co. v. Hackensack, 116 Id. 343; 384 Atl. Rep. 408 . … The proofs here exhibited are entirely unlike those which are disclosed in the case of State Board of Medical Examiners v. Baker, 10 N. J. Mis. R. 663; 160 Atl.
Cited 7 timesPublishedLinden Board of Education v. Linden Education Ass'n
202 N.J. 268 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 8, 2010
The *275 Trust Co. of New Jersey, 105 N.J. 442, 453 , 522 A.2d 992 (1987), Scotch Plains-Fanwood Board of Education v. … State, Office of Employee Relations v. Commc’ns Workers of Am., 154 N.J. 98, 111 , 711 A.2d 300 (1998); N.J. Tpk.
Cited 73 timesPublishedBowers v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
127 N.J.L. 471 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 15, 1941
In pursuance therewith the defendant Board of Chosen Ereeholders adopted on August 21st, 1941, the resolution under attack appropriating funds to cover the cost of maintenance of the said courts. … Middleton v. Robbins, 53 N. J. L. 555; Daniel B. Frazier Co. v. Harvey Cedars, 111 Id. 163.
Cited 1 timesPublishedVanderbach v. Hudson County Board of Taxation
135 N.J.L. 349 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 20, 1947
On July 23d, 1942, the Governor removed from office the then members of the Hudson County Board of Taxation and, on the same day, appointed an entirely new board. … On July 24th, 1942, the members of the new board were sworn in and thereupon attempted to take possession of the offices of the Hudson County Board of Taxation.
Cited 11 timesPublishedRoss v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
69 N.J.L. 143 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 15, 1903
The other objection, if the recent decision of this court in Schwarz v. Dover, 39 Vroom 576 , and a dictum in Moreau v. … Brinkerhoff v. Jersey City, 35 Id. 225.
Cited 1 timesPublishedFinnegan v. State Board of Tax Appeals
131 N.J.L. 276 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 16, 1944
Montgomery v. Trenton, 40 N. J. L. 89. … Montclair Savings B ank v. Sylvester, 122 N. J. Eq. 518. The judgment of the State Board of Tax Appeals is accordingly affirmed, with costs.
Cited 3 timesPublishedCory v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
44 N.J.L. 445 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1882
In the case of Jones v. Carry, 6 Bing. N. C. 247, this consideration- appears to have had weight. … Another authority in the same vein is that of Staples v. Holdsworth, 4 Bing. N.
Cited 1 timesPublishedPuchalski v. New Jersey State Parole Board
55 N.J. 113 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 16, 1969
Mastriana v. New Jersey Parole Board, 95 N. J. Super. 351 (App. … While the constitutional right to the assignment of counsel where probation is *116 sought to be revoked seems to he established (Mempa v. Rhay, 389 U. S. 128 , 88 S. Ct. 254 , 19 L. Ed. 2d 336 (1967); State v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedFox v. Board of Education of Newark
130 N.J.L. 531 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 16, 1943
Cited 6 timesPublishedJersey Triangle Corp. v. Board of Adjustment
127 N.J.L. 194 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 25, 1941
The second ground stated for denial is wholly without merit in fact as well as in law since the landowner joined in the supplemental application made to the Board of Adjustment and in Brown v. Terhune, 18 Atl. … In Durkin Lumber Co. v. Fitzsimmons, 106 N. J.
Cited 3 timesPublishedParsons v. Mullica Township Board of Education
223 N.J. 285 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 20, 2015
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrown v. Mack International Motor Truck Corp.
10 N.J. Misc. 1035 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 17, 1932
The Mack Truck Corporation issued a writ of replevin to recover possession of a truck from Nathan Brown, and in the writ demanded that Brown commence an action and file a state of demand showing the amount claimed by him. … Melier v. Fageol Co., 9 N. J. Mis. R. 37; 152 Atl. Rep. 642 . The case will go back for a proper trial with opportunity afforded counsel to present their evidence on all phases of the case.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Mack-International Motor Truck Corp.
10 N.J. Misc. 125 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 20, 1932
So much was specifically held as to proceedings to review judicial action under this very act in the case of Ackerman v. Bloomingdale, 147 Atl. Rep. 444 . The appeal will be dismissed, with costs.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna