Case law

Robinson v. Cahill

69 N.J. 449 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 30, 1976

latter call for distribution only to those who do not qualify for full equalization aid. … The majority clearly recognizes these facts.

Paff v. Ocean Cnty. Prosecutor's Office

235 N.J. 1 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 13, 2018

The dissenting judge focused on the first of that provision's two prongs, under which a record must not be "required by law to be made, maintained, or kept on file" in order to qualify for the exemption. … That investigation was at its inception, but it was clearly underway.

In re Registrant M.F.

169 N.J. 45 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 17, 2001

close is the institution or organization, in the case of a Tier Two notification, to the offender’s residence or place of work or school In some municipalities, not every institution or organization that would otherwise qualify … It clearly supports the presumptive notification that accompanies classification of a sex offender as a Tier Two registrant at moderate risk of re-offending.

Rac v. Pjs, Jr.

192 N.J. 81 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 17, 2007

The Parentage Act was intended to "establish the principle that regardless of the marital status of the parents, all children and parents have equal rights with respect to each other and to provide a procedure to establish … Umsted, 446 F. 3d 17 , 22 n. 4 (1st Cir.2006), and confers immunity on a defendant after running its course, Van Slyke v. Worthington, 265 N.J.Super. 603, 608 , 628 A. 2d 386 (L.1993).

State v. Szima

70 N.J. 196 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 17, 1976

To that end defendant waived his right to a jury trial and stipulated to the admissibility of the State's wiretap evidence, that it was his voice recorded on the tape and that the State's witnesses were qualified experts … All parties agree that disposition of the matter depends on the proper application of the balancing test established by the United States Supreme Court in Barker v.

State v. Reeds

197 N.J. 280 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 22, 2009

governs the admissibility of expert testimony and provides that “[i]f scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified … Odom, 225 N.J.Super. 564, 573 , 543 A.2d 88 (App.Div.1988)).] *293 Once that foundation is established, the prosecutor may ask the expert to express an opinion on whether, based on those facts, the drugs were possessed for

Tartaglia v. UBS PaineWebber Inc.

197 N.J. 81 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 16, 2008

plaintiff unable to establish a prima facie case in the underlying litigation”); Hannah v. … Nabisco Foods, 290 N.J.Super. 252, 275 , 675 A.2d 684 (App.Div.1996) (determining that plaintiff “clearly engaged in protected activity” under the LAD when she filed a charge with the EEOC); Melick v.

Crema v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection

94 N.J. 286 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 1, 1983

Additionally, there were no substantive criteria established before the administrative proceedings for determining how to qualify for a “conceptual approval.” … The DCR conclusion that HSDC’s project “will clearly result in the addition of a new growth center within the region” is not legally sufficient to meet the regulatory standard embodied in the LSPRD rule.

Dugan v. Dugan

92 N.J. 423 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 28, 1983

Personal tangible property is clearly includable. Id. Intangibles may also constitute property. See id. … For purposes of valuing the goodwill of a law practice, the true enhancement to be evaluated is the likelihood of repeat patronage and a certain degree of immunity from competition. See Levy v.

In Re: Petition for Referendum to Repeal Ordinance 2354-12 of the Tp. of West Orange(073069)

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 21, 2015

particular, plaintiffs claimed that the Local Redevelopment and Housing Law 5 did not exempt this bond ordinance from a referendum and that the petition contained a sufficient number of qualifying … We begin by noting that West Orange Ordinance 2354-12 clearly provides for the issuance of redevelopment bonds pursuant to the Local Redevelopment and Housing Law and related Local Bond Law.

State v. Robert Andrews (082209) (Essex County & Statewide)

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 10, 2020

The State established that the passcodes exist -- they determined the cellphones’ contents are passcode-protected. … After he was offered immunity pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 6003(a), Hubbell produced thousands of pages of requested documents and records. Ibid.

State v. Mule

114 N.J.L. 384 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 10, 1935

Thus far the jury were clearly advised that the killing, to be murder in the first degree, must have been committed in perpetrating or attempting to perpetrate the planned robbery. … Moreover, as stated, there was no evidence tending to establish the abandonment of the criminal enterprise before the firing of the deadly shot. Judgment affirmed.

State v. Marc A. Olivero (073364)

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 29, 2015

Where the language of a statute clearly reveals its meaning, the sole function of the court is to enforce the statute in accordance with its terms. … The fenced-in area at issue in this case does not qualify as a “building, room, ship, vessel, car, vehicle or airplane.”

State v. Lueder

74 N.J. 62 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 22, 1977

A majority of both the federal [9] and state [10] courts appears to have held or assumed such a right established. … This ratio decidendi *80 is clearly applicable here, the defendant now being 29 years of age.

Board of Education of the Township of Sparta v. M.N.

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 7, 2024

According to the Appellate Division, “[a]t the direction of the Legislature, the DOE promulgated regulations . . . to establish graduation standards for public high school students.” … Bd. of Educ., State Board of Education Comment/Response Form, Revised Qualifying Scores for State-Issued High School Diplomas 2 (Mar. 4, 2020).

Edward C. Jones Co. v. Town of Guttenberg

66 N.J.L. 659 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1901

said bonds, because they were not authorized or ordered by the present board of councilmen, and it is not for the best interest of the town to issue said bonds; that commissioners of adjustment had been appointed and had qualified … Ueither of these questions was within the issue presented to the judge to try, nor could proof of them tend to establish the •contention of the defendants as to that issue; the evidence was clearly immaterial, and was properly

In Re: Petition for Referendum to Repeal Ordinance 2354-12 of the Tp. of West Orange(073069)

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 21, 2015

particular, plaintiffs claimed that the Local Redevelopment and Housing Law 5 did not exempt this bond ordinance from a referendum and that the petition contained a sufficient number of qualifying … We begin by noting that West Orange Ordinance 2354-12 clearly provides for the issuance of redevelopment bonds pursuant to the Local Redevelopment and Housing Law and related Local Bond Law.

State v. Diaz-Bridges

208 N.J. 544 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 12, 2012

Clearly he would not have believed he was in custody and the statements that he did make were voluntary and exculpatory.” … defendants invoked the right to silence in a variety of contexts, and have established principles that can be summarized without great detail.

State v. Gartland

149 N.J. 456 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 19, 1997

This exception was established to allow individuals to defend their place of habitation. … Those general provisions are qualified in the case of the use of deadly force as that is defined in N.J.S.A 2C:3-11.

Meeker v. City of East Orange

77 N.J.L. 623 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1909

These cases may be taken as establishing for that jurisdiction the rule upon which the judgments under review are based. … But deeming the English rule established by the weight of authority, he declined to apply his own view at nisi prius.