Case law

Fraser v. State Board of Education

132 N.J.L. 248 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 30, 1944

The question presented on this application, and upon which we find no adjudication in the cases, is whether *249 a standing schedule of salary increases for teachers, retained on the books by successive boards of education … It was held in Greenway v. Board of Education of Camden, 129 N. J.

Del Campo v. Board of Adjustment

6 N.J. Misc. 539 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 6, 1928

. *540 The prosecutor appealed to the board of adjustment, which board affirmed the action of the building superintendent.. No testimony was taken. … We see nothing in this case which distinguishes it from the case of Feldman & Pivnick, Incorporated, v. Board of Adjustment of the City of East Orange, and, therefore, the decision in'that case controls here.

Tumulty v. HUDSON COUNTY FREEHOLDER BOARD

29 N.J. 163 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 16, 1959

Plaintiff, a taxpayer, instituted suit attack- ing the execution and the manner of rescission of the contract sued upon in Jersey City Stationers Corp. v. County of Hudson, 29 N. J. 159 (1958). … The summary .judgment will therefore be affirmed without prejudice to the plaintiff, who will be given the right to intervene upon application in the remand of the case of Jersey City Stationers Corp. v.

State v. State Board of Assessors

61 N.J.L. 289 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1897

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Conger

67 N.J.L. 444 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 24, 1902

If combination indexes are to be made, he is to make them, when the board of chosen freeholders so determines. … Any indexing which, under existing statutes, may be lawfully authorized by the board of chosen freeholders to be done, he is entitled, and he alone authorized, to do.

Redding v. Burlington County Welfare Board

64 N.J. 504 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 26, 1974

Montego Bay, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners

113 N.J. 381 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 24, 1988

State v. Essex Public Road Board

37 N.J.L. 273 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1874

The act constituting a public road board for the county of Essex, and the supplement thereto, (Laws, 1870, pp. 181, 714,) provide that the assessors, thereby authorized to be-appointed, shall proceed to consider and determine … State v. Lippincott, 1 Dutcher 434; State v. Yauger, 5 Dutcher 384. The State, Abrey, prosecutor, v. Cannon, 4 Vroom 218 , is in point and must rule this case.

State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

58 N.J.L. 141 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1895

The act simply *144 confers upon the boards the power to impose upon some competent proper county official or authority already in existence, the accounts of whom are audited and paid by the board, the performance of the … With the power of the boards thus defined and restricted, it will be seen, so far as the facts appear in the affidavits before us, neither the prosecutor nor Mr.

State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

53 N.J.L. 531 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1891

The purpose of this litigation is to set aside a resolution passed by the board of chosen freeholders-of the county of Hudson, January 5th, 1891, to purchase of' Horace K. … Section third gives the board power of condemnation in> case of failure to agree with the owner. The price agreed to be paid for the Thurber tract is over-$4,300 per acre, and for the Smith tract over $4,800 per acre.

Chastney v. State Board of Education

7 N.J. Misc. 385 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 11, 1929

It has come up through the commissioner *386 oí education and the state board, and apparently the commissioner wrote an opinion, but no copy of this, nor of the judgment of ■ the commissioner, or of the state board, has been … L. 1927, p. 787, that “every board of education shall employ a competent physician to be known as the medical inspector.”

Fagan v. Board of Fire Commissioners

90 N.J.L. 673 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 18, 1917

Justice Kalisch in the Sujrreme Court, eo nomine Durkin v. Fire Commissioners of Newark, 89 N. J. L. 468.

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Freeman

44 N.J.L. 631 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1882

This concession militates strongly against the legality of his demand, for it is a general principle that no public officer can be entitled to compensation for his public services save by express enactment, Demarest v. … But the ground onwhich, in the brief of counsel, the sheriff’s right is specially placed, is, that it has been the long- *634 continued usuage of the boards of chosen freeholders in the respective counties to allow these

Essex Public Road Board v. State

52 N.J.L. 414 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1890

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, «Garrison, Magie, Brown, Clement, Cole, Smith. 8. For reversal—None.

Shachat v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

15 N.J. Misc. 216 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 10, 1937

Landell v. Board of Conservation & Development

102 N.J.L. 441 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 21, 1926

Beuscher v. Board of Education, Waldwick

125 N.J.L. 616 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 7, 1941

The defendant Board of Education seeks a change of venue from Hudson to Bergen County. Although the rule authorized depositions none were taken.

Board of Education, Linden v. Vail

113 N.J. Eq. 113 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 28, 1933

Alby v. Essex Public Road Board

51 N.J.L. 439 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1889

In March, 1871, Bloomfield avenue was laid out by The Essex Public Eoad Board through the townships of Bloomfield and Montclair. … Ropes v. Essex Public Road Board, 11 Vroom 64 . The supplement of March 17th, 1870 (Pamph.

Milliken v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

77 N.J.L. 170 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 9, 1908

It is sought to support this nonsuit under the authority of Creighton v. … The conditions present in the case under consideration differ materially from those reviewed in Creighton v. Freeholders of Hudson, supra.