Case law

Corsaro v. New Jersey State Parole Board

122 N.J. 415 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 30, 1990

Schireson v. State Board of Medical Examiners

130 N.J.L. 570 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 24, 1943

Law, § 533; Com. v. Horton, 26 Mass. 206, 207 ; Com. v. Tilton, 49 Id. 232 ; State v. Henson, 66 N. J. L. 601, 608; compare In re Smith, 365 Ill. 11 ), while a plea of nolo contendere creates no such estoppel (Cf. … United States v. Norris, 281 U. S. 619 ; 74 L. Ed. 1076 ) but is merely an implied admission of guilt for the purposes of the instant criminal prosecution. Hudson v. United States, 272 U. S. 451 ; 71 L.

Tate v. New Jersey State Parole Board

121 N.J. 649 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 7, 1990

Nordahl v. New Jersey State Parole Board

121 N.J. 629 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 20, 1990

Tao Ming Tom King v. Planning Board

117 N.J. 155 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 11, 1989

Didian & Construction Co. v. Board of Adjustment

115 N.J. 57 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 8, 1989

Bezich v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

55 N.J. 24 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 1, 1969

of the Board and the Assignment Judge. … Cet rulo v. Byrne, 31 N. J. 320, 328-330 (1960). The Board’s role is limited solely to the creation of additional positions.

Palamone v. Paterson Board of Education

75 N.J. 599 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 17, 1978

Divan Builders, Inc. v. Planning Board

65 N.J. 283 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 2, 1974

Essex County Welfare Board v. Philpott

56 N.J. 480 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 1, 1970

White v. Violent Crimes Compensation Board

70 N.J. 279 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 1, 1976

Motion for leave to appeal is granted and the matter is remanded to the Yiolent Crimes Compensation Board for expansion of the record; such expanded record to be filed with the Appellate Division for consideration in connection

Board of Education v. Township Council

47 N.J. 423 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 31, 1966

Clayton v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

3 N.J. Misc. 46 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 31, 1924

A rule to show cause was allowed in this case, directed to the board of freeholders of Monmouth county, to1 show canse why a peremptory or alternative writ,of mandamus should not issue commanding the said board to pay a voucher

Harz v. Board of Commerce & Navigation

119 N.J.L. 305 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 28, 1938

A writ of certiorari is sought to review a riparian grant and also an option granted to the city of Bayonne by the board of commerce and navigation for the purchase by that city of lands tying under the waters of Hew York … The Supreme Court in Van Schaick v. Board of Riparian Commissioners, 82 N. J. L. 219, denied allocatur on almost precisely similar facts.

Frank v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

39 N.J.L. 347 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1877

I think that the case of Swmmerman v.

Stearns v. Board of Conservation & Development

102 N.J.L. 467 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 1, 1926

State v. Essex Public Road Board

40 N.J.L. 64 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1878

The improvements on this avenue were projected and executed under the act known as the “ Essex Public Road Board act,” and the questions presented to the court involve *65 the construction of the various acts of legislation … A further objection is urged to the validity of these proceedings, which is of a more radical character; *71 It is insisted that this case is within the rule laid down in State, Gaines, pros., v.

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. State

42 N.J.L. 263 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1880

There is nothing in the case of State v. Freeholders of Essex, 3 Zab. 214, in conflict with this conclusion. … In Freeholders v. Strader, 3 Harr. 108 , the Supreme Court, in holding that no action would lie by an individual for injuries sustained by him for neglect of duty by the board, assumed that an indictment would lie.

Lyons v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

86 N.J.L. 206 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1914

Cleveland v. Board of Finance, 38 N. J. L. 259; Rader v. Union, 39 Id. 509; Mutual Benefit Co. v. Elizabeth, 42 Id. 235; Orville v. Woodcliff, 61 Id. 107; Rutgers College v. Morgan, 70 Id. 474; O'Neil v. … Co. v. Newark, 76 Id. 555; Carlstadt National Bank v. Hasbrouck, 83 Id. 383.

Heston v. State Board of Education

89 N.J.L. 486 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 26, 1916

In Hoboken v. Phinney, 29 N. J. L. 65 (on p. 67), Mr. … v.