Case law

State v. State Board of Assessors

60 N.J.L. 372 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1897

Nevertheless, the state board continued to tax the road until and including the year 1889. The taxes assessed were paid and are not now questioned. In 1889 the association built a new grand-stand for its race-course. … The taxes under review are set aside, but, inasmuch as the state board of assessors represents the state, no costs can.be awarded to the prosecutor.

Castellano v. Linden Board of Education

77 N.J. 485 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 30, 1978

Aumaitre v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

58 N.J. 449 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 29, 1971

The trial court found plaintiffs were entitled to monetary compensation for time worked beyond regular of *451 fice hours, and the Board of Chosen Freeholders appealed. … The Board of Chosen Freeholders adopted a program of time off or money equivalent for overtime.

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Hopkins

100 N.J.L. 175 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 17, 1924

Godfrey v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

90 N.J.L. 517 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 27, 1917

Godfrey v. Chosen Freeholders, 89 N. J. L. 511. We agree that the contract was not legally awarded, but find it unnecessary to lay down any rule as to conditional awards generally. … The award of the contract, therefore, was not only invalid because not legally made, but also because the board of chosen freeholders were without authority to make the proposed improvement.

Darville v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

90 N.J.L. 617 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 18, 1917

Stat., p. 304, § 9); Maguth v. Freeholders of Passaic, 72 N. J. L. 226; Freeholders of Sussex v.

Plunkett v. Board of Pension Commissioners

114 N.J.L. 273 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 10, 1935

State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

40 N.J.L. 595 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1878

Ropes v. Essex Public Road Board, ante p. 64. Section seven of the act of 1870 gives rise to the contention in this case. … State v. Clarke, 1 Dutcher 54; Cross v. Morristown, 3 C. E. Green 305; State, Taintor, pros., v. Morristown, 4 Vroom 58 .

Lee v. Board of Township Committee

42 N.J.L. 543 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1880

Cecil v. Brigges, 2 T. … In Cunnack v. Gundry, 1 Chit.

Almindie v. Board of Excise Commissioners

73 N.J.L. 464 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 11, 1906

We are asked to allow a writ of certiorari for the purpose of reviewing a complaint that has been made in writing, under oath, against the applicant, Almindie, charging him with violation of an ordinance of the board of excise … State, Elder, pros., v. District Medical Society, 6 Vroom 200; State, Hoxsey, pros., v. Paterson, 10 Id. 489, 493; Drake v. Plume, 15 Id. 362; Farrow v. Springer, 28 Id. 353; Unger v. Fanwood, 40 Id. 548.

Cavanagh v. Board of Police Commissioners

59 N.J.L. 412 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1896

In Devault v. Mayor of Camden, 19 Vroom 434 , in this court, Mr. … Devault v. Mayor of Camden, 19 Vroom 433 ; Ayers v. Newark, 20 Id. 170; Ackerly v. Jersey City, 25 Id. 310.

Herman & Co. v. Board of Adjustment

3 N.J. Misc. 1233 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 10, 1925

Upon the refusal of the board of adjustment to grant the permit a writ of certiorari was applied for and allowed to review the action of the board of adjustment. … This ease canont be differentiated from the ease of Stein-berg v. Bigelow, Superintendent of Buildings, et al., in which an opinion will be filed at the same time as the opinion in .this case.

Smith v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

5 N.J. Misc. 153 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 19, 1927

The board of chosen freeholders refused to pay the relator’s salary on the ground that the act Pamph. L. 1926, p. 411, had repealed the act Pamph. L. 1922, p. 403. … That it may be exscinded from the act without destroying it seems clear to us under our decisions, such as Johnson v. State, 59 N. J. L. 535; Iowa Life Insurance Co. v. Eastern Mutual Life Insurance Co., 64 Id. 340.

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Hopkins

98 N.J.L. 301 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 3, 1923

The purpose of the present proceeding is to compel the county clerk of Sussex county to account to the board of freeholders for certain fees received by him during his term of office.

Godfrey v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

89 N.J.L. 511 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 24, 1917

Armitage v. Mayor, &c., of Newark, 86 N. J. L. 5. … Armitage v. Mayor, &c., of Newark, supra. Section 33 of the Crimes act (Comp.

Maguire v. New Jersey State Parole Board

122 N.J. 371 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 18, 1990

Reddy v. New Jersey State Parole Board

122 N.J. 360 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 4, 1990

Ragland v. New Jersey State Parole Board

227 N.J. 121 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 26, 2016

Mathews v. New Jersey State Parole Board

121 N.J. 650 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 7, 1990

Shabazz v. New Jersey State Parole Board

121 N.J. 649 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 7, 1990