Case law

Del Campo v. Board of Adjustment

6 N.J. Misc. 539 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 6, 1928

. *540 The prosecutor appealed to the board of adjustment, which board affirmed the action of the building superintendent.. No testimony was taken. … We see nothing in this case which distinguishes it from the case of Feldman & Pivnick, Incorporated, v. Board of Adjustment of the City of East Orange, and, therefore, the decision in'that case controls here.

Clayton v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

3 N.J. Misc. 46 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 31, 1924

A rule to show cause was allowed in this case, directed to the board of freeholders of Monmouth county, to1 show canse why a peremptory or alternative writ,of mandamus should not issue commanding the said board to pay a voucher

Tumulty v. HUDSON COUNTY FREEHOLDER BOARD

29 N.J. 163 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 16, 1959

Plaintiff, a taxpayer, instituted suit attack- ing the execution and the manner of rescission of the contract sued upon in Jersey City Stationers Corp. v. County of Hudson, 29 N. J. 159 (1958). … The summary .judgment will therefore be affirmed without prejudice to the plaintiff, who will be given the right to intervene upon application in the remand of the case of Jersey City Stationers Corp. v.

State v. State Board of Assessors

61 N.J.L. 289 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1897

State v. Essex Public Road Board

40 N.J.L. 64 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1878

The improvements on this avenue were projected and executed under the act known as the “ Essex Public Road Board act,” and the questions presented to the court involve *65 the construction of the various acts of legislation … A further objection is urged to the validity of these proceedings, which is of a more radical character; *71 It is insisted that this case is within the rule laid down in State, Gaines, pros., v.

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. State

42 N.J.L. 263 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1880

There is nothing in the case of State v. Freeholders of Essex, 3 Zab. 214, in conflict with this conclusion. … In Freeholders v. Strader, 3 Harr. 108 , the Supreme Court, in holding that no action would lie by an individual for injuries sustained by him for neglect of duty by the board, assumed that an indictment would lie.

Stearns v. Board of Conservation & Development

102 N.J.L. 467 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 1, 1926

Frank v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

39 N.J.L. 347 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1877

I think that the case of Swmmerman v.

Nichols v. Board of Education, Jersey City

9 N.J. 241 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 7, 1952

Compare Noonan v. Board of Education of the City of Paterson, 1938 School Law Decisions 331, 336 (Comm’r. of Ed. 1935), affirmed Id. 338 (St. Bd. of Ed. 1925); MacNeal v. … Hoffman v. Hock, 8 N. J. 397, 407, 408 (1952). Por the reasons stated, the decision of the State Board of Education is affirmed.

State v. Board of Assessors of Taxes

53 N.J.L. 319 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1891

. *321 Sea Island City v. Cape May, 21 Vroom 50 . … - The board of assessors met'at the court house in-July, 1889, and the resolution was then passed' increasing in some places, and decreasing in others, the amount of the assessment.

State v. Essex Public Road Board

46 N.J.L. 126 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1884

Ropes v. Essex Public Road Board, 11 Vroom 64 . *128 The second reason is because the damages assessed included sums not legally assessable. … L.,p. 714,) and this was so decided in the case of Ropes v. Essex Public Road Board, 11 Vroom 64 .

NEW JERSEY PROPERTY LIABILITY GUARANTY ASS'N. v. Brown

85 N.J. 462 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 14, 1980

85 N.J. 462 (1980) NEW JERSEY PROPERTY LIABILITY GUARANTY ASSOCIATION v. RAYMOND BROWN. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. October 14, 1980. Petition for certification denied. (See 174 N.J. Super. 629 )

Dodd v. State Board of Health

67 N.J.L. 463 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 24, 1902

The board of health was acting judicially upon the application before it, and all who were interested in that application were entitled to be heard by the board in a legally organized meeting of the board. Hutton v. … Camden, 10 Vroom 122; Traction Co. v. Board of Works, 27 Id. 431; Stanley v. Passaic, 31 Id. 392.

Sadlock v. Board of Education of Carlstadt

137 N.J.L. 85 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 1, 1948

the medical inspector appointed by the board of education that the teacher or pupil is an unfit subject for vaccination.” … Beach, 155 Ind. 121; Morris v. City of Columbus, 102 Ca. 792; State v. Hay, 126 N. C. 999 ; Abeel v. Clark, 84 Cal. 226 ; Bissell v. Davidson, 65 Conn. 183 ; Hazen v. Strong, 2 Vt. 427 ; Duffield v.

Trantino v. New Jersey State Parole Board

167 N.J. 619 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 14, 2001

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY Attorney for respondents, New Jersey Parole Board and New Jersey Department of Corrections DATED: March 2, 2001 /s/ Howard J. McCoach Howard J. McCoach Deputy Attorney General SO ORDERED.

Dohrmann v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

84 N.J.L. 689 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 18, 1913

The suit was brought by Henry Dolirmann against the board of chosen freeholders of the county of Hudson, to recover for injuries resulting to his property from the discharge of surface water thereon. … Kehoe v. Rutherford, 45 Vroom 659 .

Board of License & Excise v. Closson

49 N.J.L. 482 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1887

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Knapp, Magie, Parker, Scudder, Yan Syckel, Brown, Cole, McGregor, Paterson, Whitaker. 12. For reversal — None.

Brown v. New Jersey Division on Civil Rights

81 N.J. 407 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 30, 1979

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Clarke

65 N.J.L. 271 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 19, 1900

Warner v. … Randolph v. Wood, 20 Vroom 85 ; S. C., 21 Id. 175 ; Paul v. Gloucester County, Id. 585; Mortland v. Christian, 23 Id. 537; In re Haynes, 25 Id. 6; Matheson v. Caminade, 26 Id. 4; Wood v.

Williams v. New Jersey State Parole Board

122 N.J. 394 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 10, 1990