Case law

State v. Board of Street & Water Commissioners

56 N.J.L. 273 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1893

The charter- having limited the power of the board as to the bidder to whom the contract should be awarded, and as to his qualifications, any departure therefrom is illegal. Cory v. … The board had no right to consider any requirements not set forth in the statute or in the specifications. Shaw v. Trenton, 20 Vroom 343 .

Curley v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

66 N.J.L. 401 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 10, 1901

may order the payment of any bill or claim without such approval by a two-thirds vote of all the members of such board.” … Chism v. Schipper, 22 Vroom 1 . No method of approval is prescribed, and the chief engineer’s testimony may fairly be taken as an approval of the amount of the claim, though not of its legality.

Sufalam, Inc. v. Somerville Borough Planning Board

230 N.J. 224 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 6, 2017

Hartman v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

127 N.J.L. 170 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 25, 1941

Vide Sullivan v. McOsker, 84 N. J. L. 380; State v. DeLorenzo, 81 Id. 613; Virtue v. Freeholders of Essex, 67 Id. 139. … Duke Power Co. v. Somerset County Board of Taxation, 125 N. J. L. 431. As thus re-established, they are in pari materia, and are to be construed together as a related whole and effectuated accordingly.

Romar Realty Co. v. Board of Commissioners

96 N.J.L. 117 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 22, 1921

to buildings already erected without the consent of the said board of commissioners. … Justice Swayze, in the City of Passaic v. Paterson Posting and Sign Painting Co., 72 N. J.

Koester v. Hunterdon County Board of Taxation

79 N.J. 381 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 20, 1979

In Feld v. … See Ellis v. Board of Assessors, 358 Mass. 473, 475 , 265 N. E. 2d 491, 493 (1970): “[T]he travel trailer and mobile homes have become two different products.” It is interesting to note that in Becker v.

Williams v. New Jersey State Parole Board

165 N.J. 523 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 17, 2000

State v. Derrick Brown, Leroy Carstarphen, and Kareem Strong (070200)

216 N.J. 508 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 29, 2014

State v. Brown, 210 N.J. 216 , 42 A.3d 888 (2012). We also granted the motion of the Attorney General of New Jersey to appear as amicus curiae. II. A. … State v.

Borough of Ringwood v. Board of Review

228 N.J. 414 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 2, 2016

State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

63 N.J.L. 55 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 27, 1899

This is the construction put by the Court of Errors and Appeals upon a similar statutory provision in the case of Smith v. Regan, 25 Vroom 167 . … It was declared by this court, in the case of Haines v. Freeholders of Camden, 18 Vroom 454 , and again in Simon v.

O'Shea v. WEST MILFORD BOARD OF EDUCATION

192 N.J. 292 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 6, 2007

927 A.2d 1291 (2007) 192 N.J. 292 O'SHEA v. WEST MILFORD BOARD OF EDUCATION. Supreme Court of New Jersey. July 6, 2007. Petition for certification denied.

Paddock v. Hudson County Board of Taxation

82 N.J.L. 360 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 11, 1912

The relator was an assistant clerk in the office of the board of taxation of Hudson county. He had been in the employ of the board in the same capacity since 1906. … The mere fact that the county paid him his salary does not, according to the reasoning in Pierson v. O'Connor, 25 Vroom 36 , make him less a person in the paid service of the state. Second.

Princeton Research Lands, Inc. v. Planning Board

57 N.J. 291 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 15, 1970

Gibbs v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

101 N.J.L. 371 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 18, 1925

The Camden county board of taxation increased the assessment to $65,000. The landowner then appealed to the state board of taxes and assessment which affirmed the action of the Camden county board of taxation. … Royal Manufacturing Co. v. Rahway, 75 N. J. L. 416; Millville Water Co. v. City of Millville, 84 Id. 411. Under section 11 of the Gertiorari act of 1903 (Comp.

Smith v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

48 N.J. Eq. 627 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1891

The bill was filed by the board of chosen freeholders of Essex county, the respondent, against appellant and the Newark City National Bank. … For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Mague, Reed, Scudder, Yan Syckel, Brown, Clement, Whitaker — 9. For affirmance — Depue, Knapp, Smith — 3.

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Smith

14 N.J. 348 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 25, 1954

Schwarz Bros. v. Board of Health

83 N.J.L. 81 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 8, 1912

Traction Co. v. Elizabeth, 29 Vroom 619 ; Trenton Horse Railroad Co. v. Trenton, 24 Id. 132; Wysc v. … Board of Health v. New York, &c., Railroad Co., 48 Vroom 15 .

Electrolux Corporation v. Board of Review

129 N.J.L. 157 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 18, 1942

The Board of Review resolved the issue in the affirmative, and the Supreme Court affirmed the judgment. These respondents held contracts with appellant similar to the one considered in the case of Electrolux Corp. v. … Board of Review, 129 N. J. L. 154, a companion case this day decided.

Parsippany Hills Associates v. Rent Leveling Board

97 N.J. 643 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 19, 1984

White v. State Board of Tax Appeals

123 N.J.L. 350 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 1, 1939

The County Board affirmed the assessment, and there was a further appeal to the State Board, which was heard before one of the commissioners of that board. At the hearing Mr. … Garrett v. Garrett, 86 N. J. Eq. 293, 299; Doremus v. Doremus, 88 Id. 256; Gershonowitz v. Neider, 95 Id. 580; In re Judges, 101 Id. 9, 11; Caruso v. Caruso, 102 Id. 393, 401; Etz v. Weinmann, 106 Id. 209, 225.