Case law

State v. State Board of Assessors

59 N.J.L. 269 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1896

Beakly v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

81 N.J.L. 637 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 22, 1911

Beakly against the board of chosen freeholders of the county of Cam *638 den for damages alleged to have been done to a meadow belonging to him and abutting on a public road, known as the Camden and Blaekwoodtown turnpike … In Cetofonte v. Camden Coke Co., 49 Vroom 662 , a similar question came before this court.

Hinfey v. Matawan Regional Board of Education

77 N.J. 514 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 31, 1978

See Patterson v. Boards of Ed., 11 N. J. Misc. 179 (Sup. Ct. 1933) aff’d o.b. 112 N. J. L. 99 (E. & A. 1934); cf. Fraser v. Robin Dee Day Camp, 44 N. J. 480 (1965); see also Brown v. Board of Ed., 347 U. S. 483 , 74 S. … See Patterson v. Board of Ed., supra; cf. Fraser v. Robin Dee Day Camp, supra; see also Brown v. Board of Ed., supra.

Board of Education of West Paterson v. Board of Education of Little Falls

92 N.J.L. 284 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 27, 1918

The matter sought to be reviewed is the ruling or order of the state board of education substantially affirming the decision of the commissioner of education in a dispute between the board of education of West Paterson and … there shall be an indebtedness for which the board of education of the original school district shall be liable, the said indebtedness shall be assumed by and become the obligation of the board of educa *287 tion of the

Central Railroad v. State Board of Assessors

74 N.J.L. 1 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 12, 1906

The validity of the original act for the taxation of railroad and canal property was attacked in the .ease of the Central Railroad Co. v. … fail or refuse to comply with the order so given the board shall have power to appoint some other person to make the new assessment under the direction of the board, and the assessment so made and affirmed by the board shall

Steinberg v. Board of Adjustment, C.

106 N.J.L. 603 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 20, 1929

Having procured his plans and specifications of the building to be prepared, he submitted them to the board of tenement house supervision, and that board approved them. … This statute validated pre-existing zoning ordinances passed by the various municipalities of the state; and it was held by the Supreme Court in Koplin v. South Orange, 6 N. J. Mis. R. 489; 142 Atl.

State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

44 N.J.L. 388 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1882

He can be stripped of his salary, deposed from office, or be left unsheltered by reason of the abolition of the office itself at any moment the board chooses to exercise its power. City of Hoboken v. … Gear, 3 Dutcher 265; Butcher v. City of Camden, 2 Stew. 478 : Love v. Jersey City, 11 Vroom 456 ; Dillon on Mun. Corp., § 170. The resolution itself, however, so far as it fixes the term, must stand.

Bowman v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

73 N.J.L. 543 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 19, 1906

Poinier v. Schmidt, 15 Vroom 433 ; Road Commissioners v. Harrington Township, 26 Id. 327. The first of these cases was decided in 1882. … The decisions in Poinier v. Schmidt and Road Commissioners v.

Trantino v. New Jersey State Parole Board

154 N.J. 19 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 15, 1998

Brady v. Department of Personnel, 149 N.J. 244, 256 , 693 A.2d 466 (1997). Thus, we must first consider whether the Parole Board applied the correct legal standard for determining parole. See Beckworth v. … unless found to be arbitrary, Monks v.

Bloomfield v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

74 N.J.L. 261 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 25, 1907

In the case of Pangborn v. … Green, 13 Vroom 627 , and Hermann v. Guttenberg, 34 Id. 616. The distinction between these cases and Freeholders v.

Shamberg v. Board of Riparian Commissioners

72 N.J.L. 132 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 27, 1905

Stevens v. Paterson and Newark Railroad Co., 5 Vroom 532. … Fitzgerald v. Faunce, 17 Vroom 536.

Wawa Food Market v. Planning Board

114 N.J. 299 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 1, 1988

State Board of Medical Examiners v. Buettel

102 N.J.L. 74 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 27, 1925

In the case of Board of Medical Examiners v. … A jury was demanded and accorded under section 149 of the District Court act, following the decision in the case of Lowrie v. State Board of Dentistry, 90 Id. 54. In State v.

McDonald v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

99 N.J.L. 170 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 19, 1923

L., pp. 371, 378), it became the duty of the .board to make an appropriation; holding that the words “may * * * make appropriations therefor” are mandatory. … Seiple v. Elizabeth, 27 N. J. L. 407; Hugg v. Camden, 39 Id. 620, 622; Central Land Co. v. Bayonne, 56 Id. 297, 300; Fagen v Hoboken, 85 Id. 297.

Schwartz v. Essex County Board of Taxation

130 N.J.L. 177 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 13, 1943

The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court on certiorari is not so limited. ' Chief Justice Brogan said in Dulce Power Co. v. Somerset County Board of Taxation, 124 N. J. … Camden, 95 Id. 190; Breen Iron Works v. Richardson, 115 Id. 305; Degenring v. Kimble, 115 Id. 379; Oradell v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 125 Id. 37; Licker v. Martin Box Co., 127 Id. 136. The judgment is affirmed.

Hilson Co. v. State Board of Assessors

82 N.J.L. 2 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 31, 1911

The writ in this case was sued out to review the assessment of a franchise tax for the year 1909 laid against the prosecutor by the state board of assessors. … The claim on the part of the state is that the taxing board properly treated them as' certificates of stock.

Di Miceli v. State Parole Board

15 N.J. 446 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 31, 1954

Schwarz Bros. v. Board of Health

84 N.J.L. 735 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 18, 1913

Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. Jersey City, 18 Vroom 286 ; Gaslight Company v. Rahway, 29 Id. 510. … North Jer *740 sey Street Railway Co. v. Jersey City, 46 Id. 349, where the cases are collected. The cases dealing with the same subject matter and decided since then are Cain v. Bayonne, 52 Id. 15, and Neumann v.

Bacon v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

69 N.J.L. 195 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 24, 1903

Ferry v. Williams, 12 Vroom 332 . The facts are that the bridge and roadway in question were built by private capital under legislative sanction (Pamph. … The controversy is over the duty of the board of.chosen freeholders to put the road in question in a condition fit for public travel.

Curley v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

66 N.J.L. 401 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 10, 1901

may order the payment of any bill or claim without such approval by a two-thirds vote of all the members of such board.” … Chism v. Schipper, 22 Vroom 1 . No method of approval is prescribed, and the chief engineer’s testimony may fairly be taken as an approval of the amount of the claim, though not of its legality.