Case law

Weeks v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

68 N.J.L. 622 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 2, 1903

The liability of the board of freeholders to answer in damages for injuries received by a person in crossing a county bridge is a statutory one, and is limited to such injuries as *623 directly result from tbe neglect of … the board to properly “erect, rebuild or repair” such bridge.

State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

50 N.J.L. 82 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1887

This, it is admitted, is special and local legislation under the case of Closson v. Trenton, 19 Vroom 438 . … The only boards of freeholders, therefore, which can give such notice are the boards named in the first section, which are boards in counties having no road board.

Birkfield Realty Co. v. Board of Commissioners

8 N.J. 319 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 29, 1951

Brandon v. Board of Commissioners of Montclair

124 N.J.L. 135 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1940

Phillips Oil Co. v. Clifton, supra; Dubin v. Wich, supra; Cook v. Board of Adjustment of Trenton, supra; Schnell v. Township of Ocean, 120 N. J. L. 194. … Fordham Manor Reformed Church v. Walsh, supra; Grady v. Katz, supra; Levy v. Board of Standards and Appeals, supra.

Price v. Himeji, LLC

214 N.J. 263 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 25, 2013

See Vas v. … Co. v. Borough of S.

TSI East Brunswick, LLC v. Zoning Board

215 N.J. 26 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 23, 2013

Id. at 4 , 526 A.2d 109 ; see Sica v. … The Zoning Board was entitled to accept the expert opinion offered by New Vornado’s planner and to reject the contrary opinions offered by TSI’s planner. See Kramer v.

State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

37 N.J.L. 254 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1874

The certiorari in this case brings up a bill presented by one of the coroners of the county of Hudson,, against the board of chosen freeholders of that county, and. the resolution of the board ordering the bill paid. … In my opinion, such a rule would restrict the power of the board within too narrow limits.

Board of Education v. Englewood Teachers Ass'n

64 N.J. 1 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1973

We cer.tilled before argument there and heard the matters along ■with Dunellen Board of Education v. Dunellen Education Association, 64 N. J. 17 (1973) which was decided today. Pursuant to N. J. S. … Clifton v. Passaic County Board of Taxation, 28 N. J. 411, 421 (1958). In any event it is to be anticipated that the burdens will be minimal after a number of guideline opinions are handed down. Reversed.

Board of Education of West Paterson v. Board of Education of Little Falls

92 N.J.L. 284 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 27, 1918

The matter sought to be reviewed is the ruling or order of the state board of education substantially affirming the decision of the commissioner of education in a dispute between the board of education of West Paterson and … there shall be an indebtedness for which the board of education of the original school district shall be liable, the said indebtedness shall be assumed by and become the obligation of the board of educa *287 tion of the

New Jersey State Parole Board v. Byrne

93 N.J. 192 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 11, 1983

The Parole Board complied. Both defendants appealed to the Appellate Division. That court disposed of Byrne first. New Jersey State Parole Board v. *199 Byrne, 182 N.J.Super. 540 (1982). … In Greenholtz, 442 U.S. at 7, 11 , 99 S.Ct. at 2103-2104, 2105-2106 , 60 L.Ed.2d at 675, 677 , the Supreme Court relied on Board of Regents v.

Troth v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

60 N.J.L. 190 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1897

Shumar v. Applegate, 22 Vroom 117 . … State v. Kelsey, 15 Vroom 1 , 32.

Masiello v. State Board of Examiners

25 N.J. 590 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 20, 1958

Ct. 1935); Schwarzrock v. Board of Education of Bayonne, 90 N. J. L. 370 (Sup. Ct. 1917); Ridgway v. Board of Education of Upper Freehold Tp., 88 N. J. L. 530 (Sup. Ct. 1916). … Laba v. Board of Education of Newark, supra, 23 N. J. at page 382.

Steinberg v. Board of Adjustment, C.

106 N.J.L. 603 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 20, 1929

Having procured his plans and specifications of the building to be prepared, he submitted them to the board of tenement house supervision, and that board approved them. … This statute validated pre-existing zoning ordinances passed by the various municipalities of the state; and it was held by the Supreme Court in Koplin v. South Orange, 6 N. J. Mis. R. 489; 142 Atl.

Headen v. Jersey City Board of Education

212 N.J. 437 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 2012

Plaintiff is employed by the defendant Jersey City Board of Education (Board) 1 as a food service worker on a full-time ten-month basis. … See State Troopers Fraternal Ass’n of N.J. v.

State v. Board of License & Excise

48 N.J.L. 438 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1886

This writ brings up the proceeding of the board of license and excise of the city of Trenton, in granting a license to one James "V.' … Tiger v. Morris Common Pleas, 13 Vroom 631 . That this legislation is of a character regulating the internal affairs of cities has been repeatedly decided. The action of the board in granting the license is reversed.

Peper v. Princeton University Board of Trustees

77 N.J. 55 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 5, 1978

J. 54, 55 (1970); General Public Loan Corp. v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 13 N. J. 393, 401 (1953); Washington Nat. Ins. Co. v. Board of Review of N. J. Unemployment Compensation Commission, 1 N. J. 545, 554 (1949). … Co. v. Board of Review, supra, 1 N. J. at 553] If Peper was not promoted because she was a woman, she was denied the same right to acquire property that is guaranteed males under Art. I, para. 1.

Beckworth v. New Jersey State Parole Board

62 N.J. 348 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 19, 1973

Oswald, supra, 430 P. 2d 403 ; Walker v. Oswald, 449 F. 2d 481 (2 Cir. 1971); cf. Puchalski v. N. J. State Parole Board, supra, 104 N. J. Super, at 299-300; Briguglio v. New York State Board of Parole, 24 N. … See Menechino v. Oswald, supra, 430 F. 2d 403 ; Walker v. Oswald, supra, 449 F. 2d 481 ; cf. Puchalski v. N. J. State Parole Board, supra, 104 N. J. Super. at 300; Briguglio v.

McDonald v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

99 N.J.L. 170 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 19, 1923

L., pp. 371, 378), it became the duty of the .board to make an appropriation; holding that the words “may * * * make appropriations therefor” are mandatory. … Seiple v. Elizabeth, 27 N. J. L. 407; Hugg v. Camden, 39 Id. 620, 622; Central Land Co. v. Bayonne, 56 Id. 297, 300; Fagen v Hoboken, 85 Id. 297.

Schwartz v. Essex County Board of Taxation

130 N.J.L. 177 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 13, 1943

The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court on certiorari is not so limited. ' Chief Justice Brogan said in Dulce Power Co. v. Somerset County Board of Taxation, 124 N. J. … Camden, 95 Id. 190; Breen Iron Works v. Richardson, 115 Id. 305; Degenring v. Kimble, 115 Id. 379; Oradell v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 125 Id. 37; Licker v. Martin Box Co., 127 Id. 136. The judgment is affirmed.

State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

38 N.J. 33 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 29, 1962

See Becker v. Adams, 37 N. J. 337, 340 (1962); Jersey City v. Martin, 126 N. J. L. 353, 361 (E. & A. 1941). … Com. v. Jersey City, 93 N. J. Eq. 550, 553 (Ch. 1922). The Board refers to N. J. S. A. 27:16-31 which states that it may adopt regulations for the protection of roads under its control, and to B.