Case law

Cuna v. Board of Fire Commissioners

41 N.J. 118 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 16, 1963

Board of Trustees v. La Tronica

41 N.J. 587 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 24, 1964

Bogert v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

44 N.J. 401 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 7, 1965

Gilbert v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Board

44 N.J. 403 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 21, 1965

Harenberg v. State Board of Education

36 N.J. 135 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 2, 1961

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Brenner

13 N.J. 288 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 14, 1953

Offhouse v. State Board of Education

131 N.J.L. 391 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 10, 1944

Greenway v. Camden Board of Education, 129 N. J. L. 46; affirmed, Id. 461. … Liva v. Board of Education, 126 Id. 221. See, also, Weber v. Board of Education of Trenton, 127 Id. 279. The last cited case is also invoked by petitioners.

Electrolux Corporation v. Board of Review

129 N.J.L. 154 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 18, 1942

The Board of Review considered not alone the written contract, but also the course of practice between the parties, and concluded that, under the contract and in point of fact, the claimants were subject to appellant’s “direction … Compare Schomp v. *157 Fuller Brush Co., supra. As was said by Cardozo, C. J., in Glielmi v. Netherland Dairy Co., 254 N. Y. 60 ; 171 N. E.

Peer v. Board of Excise Commissioners

70 N.J.L. 496 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 23, 1904

The excise board of the city of Newark was without power to grant the license brought up. … It is the duty of the court or board having power to grant licenses, when it is alleged that the place sought to be licensed is a grocery store or other place where a mercantile business is carried on,. to investigate as

Lucas v. Board of Commissioners

130 N.J.L. 534 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 16, 1943

Moriarty v. Board of Commissioners

89 N.J.L. 385 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 14, 1916

In this *389 ease as in others, the act of a majority at a meeting of the board duty held, is the act of the board. That the prosecutor was not entitled to be heard in such a case is settled in this court. Miller v. … His mistake, or the conduct of the mayor could not bind the board.

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Ritson

68 N.J.L. 666 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 2, 1903

Bigg, deceased, for her board in the county hospital for the insane of Camden county. The deceased was received into- the hospital as a private patient in 1889, and the rate of board was then fixed at $3.50 per week. … Van Horn v. Hann, 10 Vroom 207 . The Circuit Court is affirmed. For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Van Syoicel, Dixon, Eort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Voori-ibes, Vroom. 12.

State v. Board of Public Works

58 N.J.L. 536 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1896

Halsey v. Newark, 25 Vroom 102 . To effectuate the purposes of the company, an ordinance of the board of public works was procured. This ordinance was passed June 19th, 1893. … McWilliams v. King, 3 Vroom 21 , 25; Hunt v. Lambertville, 17 Id. 59.

Allison v. Public Road Board

58 N.J.L. 140 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1895

The relator prays a mandamus directing the public road board of Englewood township to admit him to membership in the board. … L., p. 69. *141 In Allison v.

Lewis v. Board of Commissioners

7 N.J. Misc. 27 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 20, 1928

This is an application on a rule to show cause for a mandamus commanding the board of commissioners and inspector ■of buildings of the borough of Avon-by-the-Sea to issue to the relators a permit to erect upon property in … This question is res adjudicada, in this court, and was decided adversely to the contention of the relator in the case of Koplin v. South Orange, 6 N. J. Mis. R. 489; 142 Atl. Rep. 235 .

State v. State Board of Assessors

60 N.J.L. 66 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1897

Storage Co. v. Assessors, 27 Vroom 389 . … Edison Phonograph Co. v. Assessors, 28 Vroom 520 .

Hanna v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

121 N.J. 638 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 27, 1990

Hulme v. Board of Commissioners

95 N.J.L. 30 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 19, 1920

Prior to the decision in Herman & Grace v. Freeholders of Essex, 71 N. J. … The same definition was adopted in Union Stone Co. v. Freeholders of Hudson, 71 Id. 657; Burtis v. Haines, 91 N. J. L. 4; Murphy v. Freeholders of Hudson, Id. 40.

Laidlaw v. Board of Commissioners

122 N.J.L. 133 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 23, 1939

Murphy v. Board of Commissioners of Newark, 119 N. J. L. 537; affirmed, 121 Id. 75; O’Connell v. Bayonne, 116 Id. 61; Sykes v. Heinzman, 100 Id. 12; Seaman v. Strollo, 105 Id. 570; Post v. … Anderson, 111 Id. 303; Foley v. Orange, 91 Id. 554; Crane v. Jersey City, 90 Id. 109; affirmed, 92 Id. 248; Apple v. Atlantic City, 104 Atl. Rep. 89 (not officially reported); Bogle v. Woods, 10 N. J. Mis. R. 858.

Board of Health v. Clayton

93 N.J.L. 64 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 3, 1919

The violation charged is as follows: That defendant, on October 1.2th, 1918, “did violate the provisions of section 90 of an ordinance of the board of health of the city of Paterson, entitled, &c., in, this, that, Walter