Case law

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Lee

76 N.J.L. 327 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 5, 1908

Lee, the present clerk of Atlantic countjq to collect, for the sole use of the board of chosen freeholders of Atlantic county, as public moneys belonging to the said board, all fees, costs, perquisites, &c., which the said

State v. State Board of Assessors

61 N.J.L. 461 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1898

In Honduras Co. v. Board of Assessors, 25 Vroom 278 , Mr. … Lumberville Bridge Co. v. Assessors, 26 Vroom 529 ; Edison Phonograph Co. v. Assessors, 28 Id. 520; Electric Storage Battery Co. v. Assessors , 31 Id. 66; affirmed, ante p. 289.

State v. Board of Police Commissioners

49 N.J.L. 175 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1886

L., p. 326), gives the commissioners the power and right to suspend and to expel or discharge, provided good cause shall be shown for such suspension, expulsion or discharge after an investigation by such board. … The other causes assigned are considered and decided in the case of Ayers v. Newark, at the present term. The writ will be dismissed, with costs.

Brown v. New Jersey Division of Civil Rights

85 N.J. 465 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 20, 1980

Tricarico v. Board of Review

147 N.J. 581 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 23, 1997

Decker v. Board of Education

75 N.J. 612 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 28, 1978

Biancardi v. Waldwick Board of Education

73 N.J. 37 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 6, 1977

Redding v. Burlington County Welfare Board

65 N.J. 439 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 30, 1974

Snell v. Wyman, 281 F. Supp. 853 (S.D. N.Y. 1968), aff’d without opinion, 393 U. S. 323 , 89 S. Ct. 553 , 21 L. Ed. 2d 511 (1969); Charleston v. Wohlgemuth, 332 F. Supp. 1175 (E.D. … To the same effect are Cooper v. Laupheimer, 316 F. Supp. 264 (E.D. Pa. 1970) and Bradford v. Juras, 331 F. Supp. 167 (D.

Passaic Bergen Lumber Co., Inc. v. Brown

119 N.J.L. 428 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 26, 1938

State v. Board of Police Commissioners

49 N.J.L. 170 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1886

Haight v. Love, 10 Vroom 14 . … Gilbert, v. Patterson, 3 Vroom 177 ; State v. Tolan, 4 Vroom 195 ; State, Hoey, pros., v. Collector of Ocean, 10 Vroom 75 -79. The suit will be dismissed, with costs.

Nixon v. American Brown-Boveri Electric Corp.

6 N.J. Misc. 989 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 1, 1928

The petitioner’s testimony as to the method of pulling the electric cable on board this ship indicated a method so crude and so at variance with modern methods as, in itself, to place a strain upon credulity. … In this respect the case bears some resemblance to that of Petti v. The City of Newark, 5 N. J. Mis. R. 877. I, having heard and considered the testimony adduced, do hereby determine and find as follows: 1.

Board of Health v. Fruhman

6 N.J. Misc. 1021 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 22, 1928

York v. Frank, 1 N. J. Mis. R. 544. … State Board of Health v. Van Druens, 77 N. J. L. 443.

Johnson v. Newark Board of Education

115 N.J. 82 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 21, 1989

Estate of Graney v. Planning Board

111 N.J. 607 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 7, 1988

Hyman v. Teaneck Board of Education

104 N.J. 469 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 27, 1986

Board of Pharmacy v. Braunstein

2 N.J. Misc. 454 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 29, 1924

Judgment was rendered by tlie First District Court of Newark against the defendant and in favor of the board of pharmacy for $100, being the penalty provided by section 2 of the act in question. … Justice Garrison in Moore v. Burdell. 62 N. J. L. 163, “the title of an act is a label, not an index,” *456 and in Shultise v.

Wendel v. Board of Education

75 N.J.L. 70 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 10, 1907

the board of education as provided in this article.” … boards of education, under a general statute which is uniform as to all.

Young v. Board of Health

61 N.J. 76 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 23, 1972

Ed. 715 (1955); Baer v. City of Bend, 206 Or. 221 , 292 P. 2d 134 (1956); Hall v. Bates, 247 S. C. 511, 148 S. E. 2d 345 (1966); Kaul v. City of Chehalis, 45 Wash. 2d 616 , 277 P. 2d 352 (1954); Birnel v. … Where a general rule or declaration of policy has already been made, its particular implementation by a board of health will normally take the form of a resolution. Courter v. Board of Health of City of Newark, 54 N. J.

Masson v. Trenton Board of Education

99 N.J. 232 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 29, 1985

Frangella v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

81 N.J. 279 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 30, 1979