Case law

Vasquez v. Board of Review

65 N.J. 559 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 18, 1974

Donaldson v. Board of Education

59 N.J. 272 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 21, 1971

Freilitzsch v. Board of Education

7 N.J. Misc. 7 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 6, 1928

Schmalz v. Wooley, 57 N. J. Eq. 303. … Haynes v. Cape May, 52 N. J. L. 180; Roche v. Jersey City, 40 Id. 257; DeGinther v. New Jersey Home, &c., 58 Id. 354.

Marvin v. Board of Adjustment

5 N.J. Misc. 668 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 18, 1927

The proceedings of the board of adjustment of the town of Westfield, denying the petition of appeal uf the prosecutors from the refusal of the building inspector of the town of Westfield to grant a permit for the erection … The facts of this case fall within the ruling of the Supreme Court in Hendy v. Ackerman, 5 N. J. Adv. R. 600, where, under a like state of facts, the action of the board was set aside. The cited case is controlling.

Wood v. Board of Commissioners

10 N.J. Misc. 144 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 20, 1932

McKerihan v. Board of Education

14 N.J. Misc. 571 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 27, 1936

This case is similar in all essential features to that of Walker v. Board of Education, 116 N. J. L. 595, and we reach the same result as in that ease for the reasons expressed therein.

Board of Education v. Shepherd

15 N.J. Misc. 394 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 27, 1937

The board of education appeals from an order of the state board of education directing Shepherd’s reinstatement. … The charge was failure to be on his joh one afternoon during school hours in violation of a new rule adopted by the board. Of this rule Shepherd was not apprised.

Rossi v. Board of Commissioners

8 N.J. Misc. 465 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 27, 1930

This case comes up on writ of certiorari to review certain resolutions of the board of commissioners of the city of Perth Amboy, authorizing payments under a contract made between the said city and Stillman, Delahanty & Ferris … Wood v. Millville, 85 N. J. L. 734. The writ is dismissed, without costs.

State v. Board of Health

48 N.J.L. 452 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1886

On the 21st day of May the common council passed a resolution that the said board of health be substituted for and declared to be a board of health, under the terms and provisions of an act of the legislature of this state … L., p. 206,) does not authorize the re-organization of existing boards ; it relates to the creation of new boards of health in a manner with which the defendant has not complied. The act of 1881, (Pamph.

McCutcheon v. Board of Equalization

88 N.J.L. 728 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 6, 1916

Horner v. Board of Commissioners

91 N.J.L. 695 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 31, 1918

Kidd v. Board of Excise

78 N.J.L. 218 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 20, 1909

The case presented is this: On May 2d, 1907, Joseph Peatokas applied to the board of excise of the city of Elizabeth for a license to sell malt liquors and wines at No. 208 First street. … Nor was it a renewal of a license about to expire, because the minutes of the excise board show that the only action taken by it was the transfer of the license which would expire on June 5th, 1908.

Stanton v. Board of Education

70 N.J.L. 336 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 29, 1904

State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

52 N.J.L. 398 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1890

This time honored and well recognized method of legislation was affirmed as constitutional in the case of Paul v. … . *403 Foj■ affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Depue, Garrison, Magie, Van Syokel, Brown, Clement, Cole, Smith, Whitaker. 11. • For revei'sal—None.

Cuna v. Board of Fire Commissioners

42 N.J. 292 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 4, 1964

In Vogt v. Borough of Belmar, 14 N. … Certainly, substantial benefits inured to respondent Board of Eire Commissioners as a result of the softball team. As pointed out in Brown v. Town of Gates, et al., 266 App. Div. 640 , 44 N. Y. S. 2d 703, 705 (App.

State v. Board of Township Committee

48 N.J.L. 125 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1886

The exposition of the scope of the operation of this act as found in the opinion in the case of Elizabeth v.

Blanke v. Board of Health

64 N.J.L. 42 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 13, 1899

The act of 1897 likewise gives the board power to prescribe a penalty of not less than $10 nor more than $100 for the violation of ordinances. The penalty was fixed by the board at $25. … Benson v. Hoboken, 4 Vroom 280 ; North Hudson County Railway v. Hoboken , 12 Id. 71; Muhlenbrinck v. Commissioners, 13 Id. 364; Clark v. New Brunswick, 14 Id. 175; Morgan v. Orange, 21 Id. 389.

Ross v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

69 N.J.L. 291 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 1, 1903

As was said in Paul v. … Although in State v.

Williams v. Board of Education

87 N.J. 306 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 9, 1981

State v. State Board of Assessors

60 N.J.L. 66 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1897

Storage Co. v. Assessors, 27 Vroom 389 . … Edison Phonograph Co. v. Assessors, 28 Vroom 520 .