Case law

Preston v. Board of Education

67 N.J. 317 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 23, 1972

Cadien v. Board of Education

47 N.J. 81 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 3, 1966

Pedalino v. Board of Review

43 N.J. 129 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 3, 1964

PEDALINO, APPELLANT-PETITIONER, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. July 3, 1964. Mr. Conrad N. Koch for the petitioner. Mr. Edward A. Kaplan for the respondent. Denied.

Matazzo v. Board of Commissioners

8 N.J. Misc. 787 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 20, 1930

Hornung v. West New York; 82 N. J. L. 266. Matazzo had made a mere clerical mistake. The proper checks for all the bids were submitted in time.

Michalsky v. Board of Review

19 N.J. 442 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 31, 1955

Lutz v. Board of Health

19 N.J. 619 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 21, 1955

Kanter v. Board of Adjustment

6 N.J. Misc. 568 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 14, 1928

In Feldman & Pivnick v. Board of Adjustment of the City of East Orange, 6 N. J. Mis. R. 520, it was held: “Such board, in its acts, acts judicially on a lawful ascertainment of facts. Bilt-Wel Co. v. Dowling, 5 Id. 180. … R. 96], and there is a further presumption that the action of the board was right. Silvester v. Princeton, 5 N. J. Adv. R. 1801.

McCutcheon v. Board of Equalization

88 N.J.L. 729 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 6, 1916

Moriarity v. Board of Commissioners

90 N.J.L. 328 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 5, 1917

Hornsey v. Board of Aldermen

99 N.J.L. 277 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 5, 1923

Wogish v. Board of Health

114 N.J.L. 261 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 10, 1935

Cheery v. Board of Commissioners

52 N.J.L. 544 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1890

State v. Clarke, 1 Dutcher 54; Bodine v. … State v. Troth, 5 Vroom 377 ; State v. Fisher, 14 Id. 377.

Board of Education v. Vail

113 N.J. Eq. 113 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 28, 1933

Buohl v. Board of Commissioners

90 N.J.L. 44 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 27, 1917

Delaware River Transportation Co. v. Trenton, 86 N. J. L. 48; affirmed, Id. 679. … of street and water commissioners or a board of finance the very powers that were taken away by the adoption of the Walsh act.

Board of Health v. Rulofson

98 N.J.L. 304 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 3, 1923

As was said by the Court of Errors and Appeals in Hutton v. City of Camden, 39 N. J. … Excelsior Electric Co. v. Sweet, 59 N. J. L. 441; Murphy v. North Jersey Street Railway Co., 71 Id. 5.

Gross v. Board of Commissioners

98 N.J.L. 703 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 29, 1923

McCarly v. Boulevard Commissioners of Hudson Co., 91 N. J. L. 143. This is particularly so, as section 30 {Pamph. … Reinfeld v. Laden, post p. 709. The proceedings and the assessment for benefits are affirmed, with costs.

State v. Public Road Board

49 N.J.L. 180 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1886

The section (8) above referred to, in the original act, which is continued in the supplement, requires that “ the said board shall decide and determine upon the necessity of such proposed improvement, and if the said board … Semon v. City of Trenton, 18 Vroom 489 . For this reason the proceedings are set aside and vacated,, without costs.

Board of Justices v. Fennimore

1 N.J.L. 242 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1794

Silverman v. Board of Health

85 N.J.L. 45 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 2, 1913

The statute under which this ordinance was passed (Board of Health; Comp. Stat., p. 2663) gives to local boards of health power to pass ordinances “to prevent the sale or exposure for sale” of meat unfit for food. … The ordinance was, therefore, not within the power conferred upon local boards of health, excepting in so far as it prohibited the “offering for sale” of unsound food.

Grant v. Board of Education

5 N.J. Misc. 407 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 23, 1927

The plaintiff below did some grading work in a school playground of the board of education. … The case we think falls squarely within the ruling of the Court of Errors and Appeals in the case of Frank v. Board of Education of Jersey City, 90 N. J.