Case law

State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

63 N.J.L. 155 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 6, 1898

Loweree v. Newark, 9 Vroom 151 ; Wheeler v. Essex Public Road Board, 10 Id. 291 . … Such declarations in Swayze v. New Jersey Midland Railway Co., 7 Vroom 295 , 299; Butler v. Sewer Commissioners, 10 Id. 665, 669, and Crater v.

Resciniti v. Board Commissioners of Belleville

117 N.J.L. 1 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 22, 1936

Rep. 683 (mandamus denied to license hotel on grounds that facts were not clear); Doben v. Board of Health of the City of Paterson, 3 N. J. Mis. R. 38; 127 Atl. … Rep. 517 ; De Roos v. Chapman, supra (at p. 8 of 106 N. J.

State v. Board of Township Committee

52 N.J.L. 338 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1890

Freeholders of Sussex v. Strader, 3 Harr. 108 . … Mulligan v. Perth Amboy, ante, p. 132.

Watkins v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

73 N.J.L. 213 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 26, 1906

Freeholders v. Strader, 3 Harr. 108 ; Livermore v. Freeholders , 5 Dutcher 245; Pray v. Jersey City, 3 Vroom 394 . … Condict v. Jersey City, 17 Vroom 157 ; Wild v. Paterson, 18 Id. 406; see, also, Tomlin v. Hildreth, 36 Id. 438.

Ferry v. Board of Review

67 N.J. 80 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 29, 1975

Booth v. Board of Adjustment

47 N.J. 242 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 17, 1966

Pedalino v. Board of Review

43 N.J. 129 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 3, 1964

Sheer v. Board of Education

43 N.J. 259 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 14, 1964

Fielding v. Board of Education

39 N.J. 85 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 21, 1963

provision that: “A prior dedication or use for park purposes of such land or any part thereof shall not be deemed to preclude a transfer and conveyance thereof under the provisions of this section,” was sponsored by the Board

Lucas v. Board of Commissioners

130 N.J.L. 533 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 16, 1943

Ewald v. Board of Adjustment

6 N.J. Misc. 532 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 24, 1928

The board was also given power to administer oaths and compel the attendance of witnesses. Such board, when it acts, acts judicially on a lawful ascertainment of facts. Bilt-Wel Co. v. Dowling, 5 N. J. Mis. R. 180. … R. 96), and there is a further presumption that the action of the board was right. Silvester v. Princeton, 5 N. J. Adv. R. 1801.

Levine v. Board of Adjustment

6 N.J. Misc. 548 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 6, 1928

Erom the refusal of the building inspector to grant a permit an appeal was taken to the board of adjustment of the borough. … Several hearings were had by the board, and on July 11th, 1921', the board rendered its decision dismissing the appeal.

Urban v. Board of Adjustment

6 N.J. Misc. 602 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 19, 1928

Burg v. Ackerman, 5 Id. 96. There is also a presumption that the action of the board of adjustment was right. Silvester v. Princeton, 5 N. J. Adv. R. 1801. … This court will not disturb the action of the *604 board of adjustment unless its action is shown by evidence to be wrong. Oxford Construction Co. v. Orange, 4 N. J. Mis. R. 515.

Cadugan v. Board of Education

6 N.J. Misc. 705 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 2, 1928

The respondent claims that the threats and inducements made to force the resignation of the prosecutor’s wife as a member of the board, if any, were made by strangers to the board, and, therefore, could not bind the board … Rahway v. Board of Health, 80 N. J. L. 166; Suburban Land Co. v. Valisburgh, 68 Id. 311. The writ will therefore be dismissed.

Campbell v. Board of Pharmacy

47 N.J.L. 347 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1885

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Magie, Parker, Reed, Scudder, Yan Syckel, Brown, Cole, Paterson, Whitaker. 12. For reversal — None.

Board of Education v. Howard

65 N.J.L. 75 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 11, 1900

The plaintiff rests his case upon Newman v. Fowler, 8 Vroom 89 , in which the late Chief Justice Beasley delivered -the opinion of the Supreme Court.

State v. Board of Health

61 N.J.L. 468 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1898

The return in this case certifies a transcript ■of proceedings in a “Justice's Court,” reciting sworn complaint and process against the prosecutor for violation of an •ordinance of a local board of health, passed under section … But whether we consider the authorized judgment as one 'in a summary proceeding (as in Holzworth v.

Streeter v. Board of Health

84 N.J.L. 67 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 24, 1913

The procedure is that pre *68 scribed by the Board of Health act. Board of Health v. New York, &c., Railroad Co., 48 Vroom 15 .

Macarone v. Board of Adjustment

9 N.J. Misc. 256 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 10, 1931

Duffy, a neighbor, appealed on April 12th; the appeal was heard on the 28th and the board revoked the permit June 2d. On June 28th Mr. … At this juncture, according to the recitals of the rule presented to us for signature and consented to in writing, the board abandoned its defense and consented to entry of judgment setting aside its revocation; and on the

Thompson v. Board of Education

10 N.J. 344 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 14, 1952