Case law

Stuart v. United Ben. Life Ins.

2 F. Supp. 641 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 20, 1933

Cella, Adler & Tilles v. Brown (C. C.) 136 F. 439 ; Garrard v. Silver Peak Mines (C. C.) 76 F. 1 . … In further support of my view I cite the case of Brown v. Davis (D.

Charlotte Memorial Hospital v. Bowen

665 F. Supp. 455 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jul 21, 1987

Plaintiff made a timely request for an appeal before the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (“PRRB”) pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 405.1835 . … The Secretary argues that the Court should consider the case of United States v.

Deering Milliken Research Corp. v. Beaunit Corp.

382 F. Supp. 403 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Apr 16, 1974

Co. v. … Brown, and the Patent Examiner, Mr. Feldbaum, say otherwise.

Tasz, Inc. v. Industrial Thermo Polymers, Ltd.

80 F. Supp. 3d 671 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jan 21, 2015

Tooley v. … Patin v.

Walker v. Southern Railway Co.

237 F. Supp. 278 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jan 18, 1965

Southern not unreasonably contends that his failure to do so bars this action, and that exclusive jurisdiction is in the National Railway Adjustment Board. … . *280 Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc. v. Koppal, 345 U.S. 653 , 73 S.Ct. 906 , 97 L.Ed. 1325 (1953). In Haynes v. Winston-Salem Southbound Ry.

Anderson v. Dobson

627 F. Supp. 2d 619 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 24, 2007

This statutory scheme consistently requires board approval and a uniting. Grimes v. Alteon, Inc., 804 A.2d 256, 260 (Del.2002) (quoting STAAR Surgical Co. v. Waggoner, 588 A.2d 1130, 1136 (Del.1991) and Kalageorgi v. … Section 157, relating to rights and options respecting stock, requires board approval and a written instrument to create such rights or options. Id. at 260-61 (emphasis added); see also Patriot Scientific Corp. v.

Bonham v. WOLF CREEK ACADEMY

767 F. Supp. 2d 558 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 9, 2011

Plaintiffs allege from the outset that Wolf Creek is a boarding school for troubled teens located in Madison County, North Carolina. Wolf Creek boards the teens in “cottages” where they live with “house parents.” … See Jordan v.

Broussard v. Meineke Discount Muffler Shops, Inc.

958 F. Supp. 1087 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Mar 6, 1997

In Budinich, supra, the Court relied on Brown Shoe Co. v. … See Brown, 370 U.S. at 307-08 , 82 S.Ct. at 1514 .

Parks-Cramer Co. v. American Monorail Co.

147 F. Supp. 218 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jan 4, 1957

A spinning frame invariably consists of at least three creel boards, as such is known in the trade, — called a bottom, a middle and a top creel board. … Judge Parker, in Reynolds v. Whitin Mach.

Parkhurst v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 9, 2024

v. … Lewis v.

Coble v. Lake Norman Charter School, Inc.

District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Mar 23, 2021

Brown v. Gilmore, 258 F.3d 265, 274 (4th Cir. 2001). … In Brown v. Woodland Joint Unified School District, 27 F.3d 1373 (9th Cir. 1994), and Fleischfresser v. Directors of Sch.

CMH Manufacturing, Inc. v. Catawba County

994 F. Supp. 697 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 11, 1998

Board of County Commissioners of the County of Pueblo, Colorado, 946 F.Supp. 1539 , 1548-51 (D.Colo.1996), later proceeding sub nom. Colorado Manufactured Housing Association v. … Colorado Manufactured Housing Association v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Pueblo, Colorado, 946 F.Supp. 1539 , 1548-51 (D.Colo.1996), later proceeding sub nom.

Henry v. United States

District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 15, 2023

Meyer v. Branker, 506 F.3d 358, 369 (4th Cir. 2007) (quoting Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985)). … See Fields v. Att’y Gen. of Md., 956 F.2d 1290, 1294-96 (4th Cir. 1992); accord United States v. Torres, 129 F.3d 710, 715 (2d Cir. 1997); Wilson v. United States, 962 F.2d 996, 997 (11th Cir. 1992); Smith v.

Lynch v. Snepp

350 F. Supp. 1134 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Nov 20, 1972

(See Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, Civil Action No. 1974. See also Givens v. … In Cox v.

Blue Ridge Public Safety, Inc. v. Ashe

712 F. Supp. 2d 440 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Apr 30, 2010

Camastro v. City of Wheeling, 332 Fed.Appx. 125, 127-28 (4th Cir.2009), quoting Suarez Corp. v. McGraw, 202 F.3d 676 , 685 (4th Cir.2000) and Constantine v. … This raises an inference as to whether the Board was attempting to uncover a personal vendetta against Finn. .

BLUE RIDGE PUBLIC SAFETY, INC. v. Ashe

712 F. Supp. 2d 440 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Apr 30, 2010

Camastro v. City of Wheeling, 332 Fed. Appx. 125, 127-28 (4th Cir.2009), quoting Suarez Corp. v. McGraw, 202 F.3d 676 , 685 (4th Cir.2000) and Constantine v. … Throughout this time, Ashe served on the PPSB and Seifert was aware of his appointment to the board. [ Id., at 82, 97].

Nance v. Union Carbide Corp., Consumer Products Division

397 F. Supp. 436 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Apr 28, 1975

Brown v. Gaston County Dyeing Machine Co., 457 F.2d 1377, 1382 (4th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 982 , 93 S.Ct. 319 , 34 L.Ed.2d 246 (1972) ; McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. … Brown v. Gaston County Dyeing Machine Co., 457 F.2d, supra, at 1383; United States v. Dillon Supply Co., 429 F.2d 800, 802 (4th Cir. 1970). 12.

In re Grand Jury Subpoena No. 2013R00691-009

201 F. Supp. 3d 767 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 16, 2016

Hawkins v. Stables, 148 F.3d 379, 383 (4th Cir.1998). … See United States v.

Gross v. Saul

District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 26, 2024

The Commissioner awarded Brown a fee of $7,200.00 for his work at the administrative level, which Brown appealed. [Id. at 3]. … R.E. v. Astrue, 565 F.3d 131, 134–35 (4th Cir. 2009) (quoting Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 796 (2002)).

Ewing v. Waldrop

397 F. Supp. 509 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 20, 1975

Tickle v. … (The United States Supreme Court in Morrissey v.