Case law

Gray

District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 12, 2026

(the “School”), and Board of Directors of Charlotte Secondary School, Inc.’s (the “Board”), Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. No. 34). … The Board argued in its motion to dismiss that under , Plaintiff cannot establish the Board’s liability.

Sigmon v. Recovery Equity Investors, L.P. (In Re Shelby Yarn Co.)

306 B.R. 523 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 19, 2004

Lipkin and Finn-Egan were members of the board of directors of Shelby Yarn. Id., ¶ 4. … management issues, I think more rather than less Board meetings are indicated.”

Sherrill v. JP Stevens & Co., Inc.

441 F. Supp. 846 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Dec 9, 1977

See Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 66 P.R.D. at 486. 8. … See, e.g., Parker v. Matthews, 411 F.Supp. 1059, 1068-9 (D.D.C.1976).

United States Ex Rel. Wilson v. Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District

224 F. Supp. 2d 1042 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 19, 2002

Stinson, Lyons, Gerlin & Bustamante, P.A. v. … The alleged false claims under EWP-216 involve Defendants Graham County Board, Graham County, Williams, Cherokee County Board, Cherokee County.

Novocol Chemical Mfg. Co. v. Powers & Anderson Dental Co.

37 F. Supp. 594 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Mar 10, 1941

The solution becomes pink, then red, then brown, and a brown precipitate settles out.” Again, Dr. L. S. … In the case of Watson v.

Davis v. American Airlines

District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jun 28, 2019

Clinton v. Brown, No. 3:15cv48, 2015 WL 4941799, at *2 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 19, 2015). … v.

Malison v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.

654 F. Supp. 101 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 12, 1987

In Bayma v. … In Burke County Public Schools Board of Education v. Shaver Partnership, 303 N.C. 408 , 279 S.E.2d 816 (1981), the North Carolina Supreme Court held that state courts must by virtue of the Supremacy Clause, U.S. Const.

Bradley v. North Carolina Department of Transportation

286 F. Supp. 2d 697 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Oct 7, 2003

The NCPBA responded by sending a letter to the Woodfin Board of Aldermen on February 13, 2002, recommending the Board ask the SBI to investigate Honeycutt. Id. … Jones v.

Carper v. Wall

292 F. Supp. 340 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Oct 19, 1968

Decisions in support of this view are: Commissioner v. Duberstein, 363 U.S. 278 , 80 S.Ct. 1190 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1218 (1960); Simpson v. United States, 261 F.2d 497, 500-501 (7th Cir. 1958); Bounds v. … .); Tomlinson v. Hine, 329 F.2d 462, 466 (5th Cir. 1964).

Smith v. Pollino

District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 1, 2020

Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997) (emphasis in original). … Bd. of County Com’rs of Bryan County v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 405 (1997) (citation omitted). The Fourth Circuit has similarly held that “[t]he substantive requirements for proof of municipal liability are stringent.”

Fuller v. Honeycutt

District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 2, 2022

In Woodford v. … See Germain v. Shearin, 653 Fed. Appx. 231, 234 (4th Cir. 2016); French v. Warden, 442 F. App’x 845, 846 (4th Cir. 2011).

Allied Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Industrial Relations Council for the Plumbing & Pipe Fitting Industry

685 F. Supp. 552 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 24, 1988

The decision by the [IRC], Joint Conference Board, or any arbitrators or arbitration body selected by the Joint Conference Board shall be binding on all parties. Complaint Exh. A, Allied Mechanical Contractors v. … (“the NLRB or the Board”).

Mackins

District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 2, 2026

. ¶¶ 70, 140; Body Worn Camera Video of Officer Brown (“Brown BWC”) at 12:52:25-27. Also, prior to the car moving, Brown “opened the driver side door,” Id. ¶ 71; Brown BWC at 12:52:27. … Lipscomb’s vehicle was in reverse, the open driver’s side door knocked Officer Brown to the ground.” Complaint, ¶¶ 80-81; Brown BWC at 12:52:28-32.

Kephart v. Cherokee County

52 F. Supp. 2d 598 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Apr 28, 1999

Urofsky v. Gilmore, 167 F.3d 191, 195 (4th Cir.1999). … Holland v. Rimmer, 25 F.3d 1251, 1254 (4th Cir.1994) (quoting Rankin v. McPherson, 483 U.S. 378, 383 , 107 S.Ct. 2891 , 97 L.Ed.2d 315 (1987) and Huang v.

Moore v. CITY OF ASHEVILLE, NC

290 F. Supp. 2d 664 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Nov 13, 2003

Section 10-86 provides for a Noise Ordinance Appeals Board (“Appeals Board”) to which a person charged under the Noise Ordinances may appeal. … Section 10-86 also provides that a decision of the Appeals Board may be appealed to the City Manager.

Evans v. Central Piedmont Community College

475 F. Supp. 114 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 20, 1979

See Sledge v. J. P. Stevens & Co., Inc., 585 F.2d 625 (4th Cir. 1978). 8. … McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, supra; Trustees of Keene State College v. Sweeney, 439 U.S. 24 , 99 S.Ct. 295 , 58 L.Ed.2d 216 (1978).

Berry Brothers Corp. v. Sigmon

206 F. Supp. 653 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jul 21, 1962

boarding, pairing and packaging. … Otto v. Koppers Co., 4 Cir., 246 F.2d 789, 799-800 .

Grier v. Casey

643 F. Supp. 298 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 10, 1986

See e.g., Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248 , 101 S.Ct. 1089 , 67 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981); Board of Trustees of Keene State College v. … Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine, supra; Board of Trustees of Keene State College v. Sweeney, supra; Marquis v. Omaha District Sales Office, 440 F.2d 1157 (8th Cir.1971); Blue Bell Boots, Inc. v.

Foster v. Simon

467 F. Supp. 533 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Mar 23, 1979

See Board of Trustees of Keene State College v. Sweeney, - U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 295 , 58 L.Ed.2d 216 (1978), and cases cited therein. *537 6. … See Firebird Society v. Members of the Board of Fire Commissioners, 556 F.2d 642 (2nd Cir. 1977); Cf., Wheeler v. Durham City Board of Education, 585 F.2d 618 (4th Cir. 1978). A judgment will be entered accordingly.

Rasul v. Ishee

District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 18, 2023

The requirements of due process are satisfied if “there is any evidence in the record that could support the conclusion reached by the disciplinary board.” Superintendent, Mass. Corr. Inst., Walpole v. … V.