Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncwd

1,784 results

0.32s

  • Brown v. Saul

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Oct 15, 2024

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION No. 3:20-CV-328-GCM TAMINA BROWN, ) ) Plaintiff … After considering the factors identified by the Fourth Circuit in Mudd v. Barnhart, 418 F.3d 424, 428 (4th Cir. 2005), the Court finds the fees requested to be reasonable.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

    67 F.R.D. 648 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jul 11, 1975

    This order intends therefore to close the file; to leave the constitutional operation of the schools to the Board, which assumed that burden after the latest election; and to express again a deep appreciation to the Board … The local School Board members have not followed that siren.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Moore v. Gaston County Board of Education

    357 F. Supp. 1037 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Mar 7, 1973

    Brown, received some telephone calls from irate parents —at his dinner time! The next morning Mr. Brown talked with Mr. … Board of Education, etc., 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968); Pred v. Board of Public Instruction, etc., 415 F.2d 851 , 855 (5th Cir. 1969).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Carr v. Saul

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Mar 31, 2022

    Grayson O Co. v. … (alterations omitted) (quoting Brown v. Nucor Corp., 785 F.3d 895, 932 (4th Cir. 2015)); see also Steves & Sons, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

    311 F. Supp. 265 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 5, 1970

    County School Board of New Kent County, 391 U.S. 430 , 88 S.Ct. 1689 , 20 L.Ed.2d 716 ; Alexander v. Holmes County Bd. of Educ., 396 U.S. 19 , 90 S.Ct. 29 , 24 L.Ed.2d 19 (Oct. 29, 1969); Carter v. … That the defendants maintain a continuing control over the race of children in each school, just as was done for many decades before Brown v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Martin v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

    475 F. Supp. 1318 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 10, 1979

    See, e. g., Brown v. … in each school, just as was done for many decades before Brown v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Collum v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

    614 F. Supp. 2d 598 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jun 16, 2008

    . § 636 (b)(1); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); United States v. … Braswell v. Braswell, 330 N.C. 363 , 410 S.E.2d 897, 901 (1991).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Capacchione v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

    179 F.R.D. 505 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 20, 1998

    Rather, they contend that the appropriate remedy for Proposed Intervenors who disagree with a school board decision is to select new board members. They cite United States v. … Similarly, Pate v. Dade County School Bd., 588 F.2d 501 (5th Cir.1979) and United States v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Singleton v. Anson County Board of Education

    283 F. Supp. 895 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Mar 21, 1968

    The injunctive remedy has been used often by the Federal courts in school cases to implement the Supreme Court decision of Brown v. … The case of Brown v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Linder v. Brown

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Mar 14, 2024

    BROWN, et al., ) ORDER ) Defendants. ) ________________ … P. 41(b) (“If the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with these rules or a court order, a defendant may move to dismiss the action or any claim against it.”); Link v. Wabash R.R.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

    311 F. Supp. 265 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 5, 1970

    County School Board of New Kent County, 391 U.S. 430 , 88 S.Ct. 1689 , 20 L.Ed.2d 716 ; Alexander v. Holmes County Bd. of Educ., 396 U.S. 19 , 90 S.Ct. 29 , 24 L.Ed.2d 19 (Oct. 29, 1969); Carter v. … That the defendants maintain a continuing control over the race of children in each school, just as was done for many decades before Brown v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Lambert

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 21, 2023

    Whitley v. Albers, 475 U.S. 312, 319 (1986). … Jackson v. Holley, 666 F. App’x 242, 244 (4th Cir. 2016); see Woodford v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Adams

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jan 16, 2024

    BROWN ) and RICHARD T. … Brown and Richard T. Brown filed this action in this Court against Defendants James Dallas Adams and Oni Tree Trucking, Inc., alleging claims of negligence, negligence per se, and loss of consortium. [Doc. 1].

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

    334 F. Supp. 623 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Oct 21, 1971

    That the defendants maintain a continuing control over the race of children in each school, just as was done for many decades before Brown v. … .” *631 February 5, 1970, page U, t[9-‘ “That the defendants maintain a continuing control over the race of children in each school, just as was done for many decades before Brown v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Norman v. Brown

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 30, 2023

    Wayn Brown,” the Plaintiff complains about the “lack of interest” that Brown gave the Plaintiff’s request for a warrant on a woman who had allegedly stabbed the Plaintiff at his home in 2020. … Brennan, 511 U.S. 825 (1994); Brown v. Harris, 240 F.3d 383, 388-90 (4th Cir. 2001) (applying Farmer to a pretrial detainee’s failure to protect and medical claims).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

    379 F. Supp. 1102 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jul 30, 1974

    Its effects also start in the minds of those who are discriminated against. *1105 Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U. … V. Reduction of distance traveled. As many long-distance satellite arrangements as possible are to be eliminated.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

    362 F. Supp. 1223 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 16, 1973

    United States v. Board of Public Instruction, 395 F.2d 66 (CA5 1968); Brewer v. School Board, 397 F.2d 37 (CA4 1968).” … “February 5, 1970, page U, ff 9: ‘That the defendants maintain a continuing control over the race of children in each school, just as was done for many decades before Brown v. *1241 Board of Education, and maintain the racial

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Saul

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 15, 2023

    Id.; see also Lewis v. Berryhill, 858 F.3d 858, 861 (4th Cir. 2017) (citing Mascio v. Colvin, 780 F.3d 632, 634 (4th Cir. 2015)); 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520(a)(4), 416.920(a)(4)). … Finally, Claimant analogizes his case to Cole v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • O'Kelly v. Brown

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Nov 9, 2022

    Brown, identified as a Prison Emergency Response Team (P.E.R.T.) Sergeant; John Doe Defendants #1 and #2, identified as P.E.R.T. … See Thornburgh v. Abbot, 490 U.S. 401, 408 (1989); Pell v. Procunier, 417 U.S. 817 (1974).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Thomas

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 28, 2022

    Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327-28 (1989). Furthermore, a pro se complaint must be construed liberally. Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). … Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.