Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncwd

1,784 results

1.60s

  • MB Realty Group, Inc. v. Gaston County Board of Education

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 14, 2019

    See Emmett v. … See Magana, 645 S.E.2d at 92-93 (holding that the Board’s self-insured retention exhaustion requirement had the effect of making the “insurance policy’s coverage contingent upon the Board’s liability, the Board’s failure

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • McNabb v. North Carolina

    156 F. Supp. 2d 546 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jun 26, 2001

    Brown, 215 F.3d 1320 (table), 2000 WL 691436 , *4 (4th Cir.2000) *549 (quoting Celotex, 477 U.S. at 327 , 106 S.Ct. 2548 ). II. … This argument is meritless, for not only does the Eleventh Amendment bar citizens from bringing such suits against the States in federal court, see e.g., Board of Trustees of Univ. *551 of Ala. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bynum v. Second Ward High School Mecklenbug County School Board

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jul 25, 2019

    He names the Second Ward High School Mecklenburg County School Board and the “Staff of Second Ward” as Defendants. … Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327-28 (1989). Furthermore, a pro se complaint must be construed liberally. Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Schulze v. Meritor Automotive

    163 F. Supp. 2d 599 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 30, 2000

    Brown interviewed plaintiff, who said that she and Wells were Mends and that they were not having an affair. … Raley v. Board of St. Mary’s County Comm’rs, 752 F.Supp. 1272, 1281 (D.Md.1990).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • MB Realty Group, Inc. v. Gaston County Board of Education

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jun 28, 2019

    Lincoln v. Bueche, 601 S.E.2d 237, 244 (N.C. Ct. App. 2004). … See Basnight v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sigmon v. Poe

    391 F. Supp. 430 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 24, 1975

    On October 18, 1974, another order was entered in which the court (1) declined the suggestion that the court conduct the hearing; (2) suggested that the Board arrange for some tribunal other than the Board for that purpose … Plaintiff contends that the members of the Board had already made up their minds.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Gassaway v. Barry

    123 F. Supp. 670 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 2, 1954

    Hayes v. Board of Trustees of Elon College, 224 N.C. 11 , 29 S.E.2d 137 , where the authorities are assembled. … Brown v. Bottoms Truck Lines, 227 N.C. 299 , 42 S.E.2d 71 ; Newsome v. Surratt, 237 N.C. 297 , 74 S.E.2d 732 , where the authorities are cited. Hodges v. Johnson, D.C., 52 F.Supp. 488 ; War Emergency Co-op Ass’n v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Johnston v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

    181 F. Supp. 716 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 5, 1959

    This cause came on to be heard upon the verified petition of Reed Johnston, Regional Director of the Eleventh Region of the National Labor Relations Board (herein called the Board), for a temporary injunction pursuant to … Petitioner is Regional Director of the Eleventh Region of the Board, an agency of the United States, and filed this petition for and on behalf of the Board. 2.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reese v. Meritor Automotive, Inc.

    113 F. Supp. 2d 822 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Apr 20, 2000

    Brown, 184 F.3d at 396 . … Brown, supra; Lissau v. Southern Food Serv., Inc., 159 F.3d 177 , 182 (4th Cir.1998); Mills v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Henrietta Mills Co. v. Rutherford County

    26 F.2d 799 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jun 13, 1928

    Connor v. Board of Commissioners of Logan County, Ohio (D. C.) 12 F.(2d) 789 ; Connecting Gas Co. v. Imes (D. C.) 11 F.(2d) 191 . … Connecting Gas Co. v. Imes (D. C.) 11 F.(2d) 191, 195 ; Connor v. Board of Com’rs of Logan County, Ohio (D. C.) 12 F.(2d) 789, 791 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Dewees v. Whisenant

    142 F. Supp. 205 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jun 20, 1956

    Cones as such are almost invariably made of fiber board and are hollow on the inside. … Brown v. Piper, 91 U.S. 37 , 23 L.Ed. 200 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Boone v. Buncombe County Board of Education for Buncombe County Schools

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 8, 2023

    See, e.g., Miles v. … The Board had no notice during the EEOC administrative process that Plaintiff would subsequently claim the Board forced her to retire. See Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Baqir v. Principi

    288 F. Supp. 2d 706 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 11, 2003

    See Brown v. General Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 825 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1964 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). … Brown, 425 U.S. at 835 , 96 S.Ct. at 1969 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Boone v. Buncombe County Board of Education for Buncombe County Schools

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Mar 16, 2023

    Young v. City of Mount Ranier, 238 F.3d 567, 573 (4th Cir. 2001); see also Fawzy v. … .’”); Colin v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hoke v. BD. OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS OF STATE OF NC

    445 F. Supp. 1313 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 23, 1978

    North Carolina State Board of Education, 493 F.2d 1016 (4th Cir. 1974); Alabama Optometric Association v. Alabama State Board of Health, 379 F.Supp. 1332 (M.D.Ala.1974); cf. Mazzuco v. … Hoke v. Board of Medical Examiners, 395 F.Supp. 357 (W.D.N.C. 1975), relying on Withrow v. Larkin, 421 U.S. 35 , 95 S.Ct. 1456 , 45 L.Ed.2d 712 (1975).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Dixon v. Patel

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Oct 9, 2025

    See, e.g., Koehler v. Dodwell, 152 F.3d 304, 306 (4th Cir. 1998); FDIC v. Schaffer, 731 F.2d 1134, 1135–36 (4th Cir. 1984); Thomas & Howard Co. v. … Apr. 27, 2015) (citing Choice Hotels Int’l, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cox v. Indian Head Industries, Inc.

    187 F.R.D. 531 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 20, 1999

    We cannot disagree with the proposition underlying the across-the-board rule — that [sexual harassment] is by definition class [harassment]. … Boley v. Brown, 10 F.3d 218, 223 (4th Cir.1993). “[E]ach putative class member’s claim for [ ] damages was inherently individualized and thus not easily amenable to class treatment.” Broussard, 155 F.3d at 342 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • T.W.T. Distributing, Inc. v. Johnson Products Co.

    966 F. Supp. 2d 576 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 19, 2013

    The Complaint alleges that Brown made those representations with reckless indifference to their truthfulness. … Textiles, Inc. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Perkins

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 13, 2026

    ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … ) ORDER ) GASTON COUNTY BOARD OF ) EDUCATION, )

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Howie v. Byrd

    396 F. Supp. 117 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 14, 1975

    The Supreme Court of the United States in Jones v. … ,’ United States v.

    Reversed by Howie v. Byrd, 532 F.2d 750 (1976)Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.