Case law

Suarez v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

123 F. Supp. 2d 883 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 4, 2000

Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 152 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984). Accord Dennis v. County of Fairfax, 55 F.3d 151, 156 (4th Cir.1995); and EEOC v. … Id. at 278, 450 S.E.2d at 756 , quoting Clark v. Brown, 99 N.C.App. 255, 261 , 393 S.E.2d 134, 137 , disc. rev. den., 327 N.C. 426 , 395 S.E.2d 675 (1990). 2 .

Cities4life, Inc. v. City of Charlotte

341 F. Supp. 3d 621 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 18, 2018

Doe v. Va. Dep't of State Police , 713 F.3d 745 , 758 (4th Cir. 2013) (quoting Miller v. Brown , 462 F.3d 312 , 319 (4th Cir. 2006) ). … Although the State Board argued that further review by the Board was needed before the claim could become ripe, the Fourth Circuit found that the State Board had already "manifested its views" that the regulations applied

Miller v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools

District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 30, 2024

Brown v. Charlotte Rentals, LLC, No. 3:15-CV-0043- FDW-DCK, 2015 WL 4557368, at *3 (W.D.N.C. Jul. 28, 2015). … Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 152 (1984) (per curiam). “Service rules . . . apply equally to litigants proceeding with or without counsel.” Shaver v.

David v. Alphin

817 F. Supp. 2d 764 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 22, 2011

Board of Regents v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478, 483-84 , 100 S.Ct. 1790 , 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980); Miles v. … Browning v. Tiger’s Eye Benefits Consulting, 313 Fed.Appx. 656, 663 (4th Cir.2009).

Capacchione v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

186 F.R.D. 338 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 22, 1999

FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY The landmark school desegregation case Swann v. … On 6 March 1998, pursuant to a motion by the Swann Plaintiffs, the Court reactivated Swann and consolidated it with Ca-pacchione v.

Capacchione v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

186 F.R.D. 335 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Nov 23, 1998

Defendant Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education et al. (the “School Board”) filed a Motion to Compel Responses from Plaintiff Capac-chione to Document Requests and Interrogatories [document no. 84]. … To that extent, the School Board’s Motion to Compel is denied.

Crowe v. Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians, Inc.

442 F. Supp. 334 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Dec 2, 1977

As a result the Council voted to set up a Board of Elections and to place this responsibility with such body. The Court will first consider the jurisdictional question. In Crowe v. … White Eagle v. One Feather, 478 F.2d 1311 (8th Cir. 1973); Daly v. United States, 483 F.2d 700 (8th Cir. 1973), and Brown v. United States, 486 F.2d 658 (8th Cir. 1973).

United States v. Miller

361 F. Supp. 825 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jul 24, 1973

See Lipscomb v. Clark, 468 F.2d 1321 (5th Cir. 1972), and Brown v. United States, 483 F.2d 116 (4th Cir. 1973) (concurring and dissenting opinion). I therefore conclude that under the Tucker doctrine Mr. … ABA Standards Relating to Sentencing Alternatives and Procedures 8, 9, 200 & 230 (Approved Draft 1968); See Hayner, Sentencing by an Administrative Board, 23 Law & Con-temp. Prob. 477 (1958).

Worley v. Bounds

355 F. Supp. 115 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 23, 1973

Brown v. Peyton, 437 F.2d 1228, 1230 (4th Cir. 1971). See also, Cooper v. Pate, 378 U.S. 546 , 84 S.Ct. 1733 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1030 (1964) ; Walker v. Blackwell, 411 F.2d 23 (5th Cir. 1969); Pierce v. … Barnett v. Rodgers, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 296 , 410 F.2d 995, 1002 (1969). Therefore, in light of Brown v.

Boggan v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.

86 F. Supp. 2d 545 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 18, 2000

Brown v. McLean, 159 F.3d 898, 903 (4th Cir.1998), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 119 S.Ct. 1577 , 143 L.Ed.2d 672 (1999). Indeed, she admits that she declined to do so because of her sister’s illness. … Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e); Orsi v.

Lee v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

912 F. Supp. 2d 375 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Dec 12, 2012

The Board has exclusive jurisdiction over minor disputes, and a party cannot bypass the Board and take the dispute into federal court, except to enforce the Board’s award. … Sanford v. Main Street Baptist Church Manor, Inc., 327 Fed.Appx. 587, 598 (6th Cir.2009); Idusuyi v. State of Tennessee Department of Children’s Services, 30 Fed.Appx. 398, 401 (6th Cir.2002); Brown v.

Layman v. Alexander

294 F. Supp. 2d 784 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Nov 21, 2003

See id.; see also Brown v. Gilmore, 278 F.3d 362, 367 (4th Cir.2002). … Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 828 , 114 S.Ct. 1970, 1974 , 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994) (Eighth Amendment requires provision of medical care to prisoners who require it); Brown v.

Layman Ex Rel. Layman v. Alexander

343 F. Supp. 2d 483 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Nov 18, 2004

Bd. of County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). … Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 834, 837 , 114 S.Ct. 1970 , 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994); Brown v. Hams, 240 F.3d 383, 388-89 (4th Cir.2001).

Kimsey v. Snap-On Tools Corp.

752 F. Supp. 693 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Nov 28, 1990

In support of their position, Defendants cite the 1950 Fourth Circuit case of Brown v. Eastern States Corp., 181 F.2d 26 (4th Cir.1950), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 864 , 71 S.Ct. 88 , 95 L.Ed. 631 (1950). … In McGann v. Mungo, 578 F.Supp. 1413 (D.S.C.1982), Judge Matthew J. Perry cited the Brown case. However, Judge Perry noted that the subsequent United States Supreme Court case of United Mine Workers of America v.

Moorehead v. Keller

845 F. Supp. 2d 689 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 29, 2012

Brown (“Brown”). (Doc. No. 22). … In Jones v.

Hensley v. Danek Medical, Inc.

32 F. Supp. 2d 345 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 5, 1998

Shaw v. Stroud, 13 F.3d 791, 798 (4th Cir.1994) (citing Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986)). … Thacker v.

MB Realty Group, Inc. v. Gaston County Board of Education

District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 28, 2019

P. 37(e); and (2) [the Court’s] ‘inherent power’” Silvestri v. Gen. Motors Corp., 271 F.3d 583, 590 (4th Cir. 2001) (quoting Chambers v. … Nuvasive, Inc. v. Kormanis, No. 1:18- cv-282, 2019 WL 1171486, at *2 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 13, 2019) (citing Mississippi Publishing Corp. v. Murphee, 326 U.S. 438, 444 (1946)).

Sigmon v. Poe

381 F. Supp. 387 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 5, 1974

It is believed that these legal conclusions are supported by the following decisions: Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Perry v. … Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972); Johnson v. Fraley, 470 F.2d 179 (4th Cir. 1972); Whitney v. Board of Regents, 355 F.Supp. 321 (E.D.Wis. 1973); Kennedy v.

Brown-Bey v. North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services-Vital Records

District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Oct 28, 2021

The Plaintiff has filed at least three prior civil actions that count as strikes under § 1915(g): Brown-Bey v. North Carolina, 5:17-ct-3253-D, 2019 WL 165697 (E.D.N.C. … Jan. 9, 2019) (§ 1983 action dismissed for failure to state a claim); Brown-Bey v. Hooks, 3:18-cv-460-FDW, 2018 WL 4620617 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2018) (§ 1983 action dismissed as frivolous); Brown- Bey v.

Borom v. Cox

District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jul 14, 2022

Both boards are created by, and are extensions of, the county.” Avery v. Burke Cnty., 660 F.2d 111, 113–14 (4th Cir. 1981). Thus, in North Carolina, county DSS agencies are not legal entities capable of being sued. … Hinkle v. City of Clarksburg, W.Va., 81 F.3d 416, 421 (4th Cir. 1996) (citing Hafner v. Brown, 983 F.2d 570, 577 (4th Cir. 1992)).