Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncwd

1,784 results

1.67s

  • Nolan

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 1, 2026

    (citing Sweda v. … May 25, 2023) (dismissing co- fiduciary claim where the plaintiff alleged only that the “Board of Trustees knew of ‘each breach’ stemming from ‘maladministration resulting in plan losses’ and that they either knowingly

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Southeastern Public Safety Group Inc. v. Munn

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 11, 2021

    Adams v. Bain, 697 F.2d 1213, 1219 (4th Cir. 1982). In Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac R.R. Co. v. … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hoffman v. Hunt

    923 F. Supp. 791 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Apr 17, 1996

    Santa Cruz Fruit Packing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 303 U.S. 453, 466 , 58 S.Ct. 656, 660 , 82 L.Ed. 954 . … See New York v. United States, supra, at 154-163, 112 S.Ct., at 2417-2422; FERC v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Skibo v. Greer Laboratories, Inc.

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 22, 2019

    Mann v. … Karvelas v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • James v. City of Monroe

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 10, 2022

    Cotoman a board certified forensic psychiatrist testified that Plaintiff suffered from delirium characterized by the sudden onset of a cognitive break caused by hypoglycemia (due to only eating a smoothie that day) and … Id.; Roncales v. Cnty. of Henrico, 451 F. Supp. 3d 480, 495 (E.D. Va. 2020). The First Amendment protects speech on matters of public concern. New York Times Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • La Michoacana Natural, LLC v. Maestre

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 7, 2021

    Columbia Mill Co. v. … See, e.g., English v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Parks v. Louisiana-Pacific Corporation

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 20, 2019

    Edwards v. Murphy-Brown, L.L.C., 760 F. Supp. 2d 607, 625 (E.D. Va. 2011). See also Lewis v. City of Fresno, No. CV–F–08–1062, 2009 WL 2905738, at *7, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80556, at *18 (E.D. Ca. … Faragher v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Coleman v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 24, 2023

    Raynor v. … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hale v. United States

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jan 22, 2020

    Ohio v. … See, e.g., United States v. Brown, 576 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kamel v. 5Church, Inc

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 23, 2019

    Co. v. … Oct. 22, 2018) (holding contractual and trademark rights are intangible interests and dismissing plaintiff’s conversion claim); Surratt v. Brown, 2015 NCBC LEXIS 75, at *16 (N.C. Super. Ct.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Spindelfabrik Suessen-Schurr, Stahlecker & Grill GmbH v. Savio S.P.A.

    778 F. Supp. 839 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 6, 1991

    Co. v. … Stratoflex, Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Rickman

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 22, 2020

    Wright v. … Ct. at 285; Overman v. Wang, 801 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bollinger v. United States

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Oct 9, 2019

    See United States v. … See Turner v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. v. TEC Holdings, Inc.

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jan 17, 2023

    See United States v. Yucel, 97 F. Supp. 3d 413, 417–18 (S.D.N.Y. 2015); United States v. Nosal, 676 F.3d 854, 859 (9th Cir. 2012). … Van Buren v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 1648, 1662 (2021).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. v. TEC Holdings, Inc.

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 3, 2023

    See United States v. Yucel, 97 F. Supp. 3d 413, 417–18 (S.D.N.Y. 2015); United States v. Nosal, 676 F.3d 854, 859 (9th Cir. 2012). … Van Buren v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 1648, 1662 (2021).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. v. TEC Holdings, Inc.

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 16, 2023

    Ricci v. DeStefano, 129 S. Ct. 2658. 2677 (2009) (quoting Matsushita v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 US, 574, 587 (1986)). IV. DISCUSSION A. … See United States v. Yucel, 97 F. Supp, 3d 413, 417-18 (S.D.N.Y. 2015); United States v. Nosal, 676 F.3d $54, 859 (9th Cir. 2012).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.