Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncwd

1,784 results

1.40s

  • Toth v. United States

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Apr 28, 2020

    United States v. Pender, 514 Fed. Appx. 359 (4th Cir. 2013) (quoting Brown v. Doe, 2 F.3d 1236, 1246 (2d Cir. 1993)). … Moody v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Parker

    36 F. Supp. 3d 550 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 1, 2014

    United States v. Terry, 257 F.3d 366, 367 (4th Cir.2001); United States v. … United States v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cunningham v. Affordable Auto Protection, LLC

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 27, 2024

    Mylan Labs., Inc. v. … Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Ct. of Calif., San Francisco Cnty., 582 U.S. 255, 262 (2017) (emphasis in original) (citing Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A., v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Caballero v. Boney

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jun 28, 2019

    Jums, cc: Grievance Board Director Finesse G. Couch, cc: Lanesboro Head Superintendent David R. Mitchell” requested remedy: “For Mr. … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sutherland v. United States

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 10, 2021

    The letter also stated that Petitioner had served on the STS board of directors, but that he had no ownership interest in and was not employed by STS. [Id. at 56]. … Maleng v. Cook, 490 U.S. 488, 491-92 (1989).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Robinson v. Saul

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jun 23, 2022

    Specifically, the VE testified that according to the factors given by the ALJ, occupations claimant could perform included a sorter, a packager, and a circuit board assembler. 3 Under 20 CFR § 404.1567(a), sedentary work … Similarly, in Monroe v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • True Homes, LLC v. CMH Manufacturing, Inc.

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Nov 5, 2020

    See Anderson v. … Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 923 (2011).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Controls Southeast, Inc. v. QMax Industries, Inc.

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 14, 2024

    Allen v. Wright, 468 U. S. 737, 750 (1984). They keep courts acting like courts.” Biden v. Nebraska, 600 U.S. 477, 523 (2023) (Kagan, J. dissenting). See Simon v. Eastern Ky. … Because CSI “has no Board of Directors, no decision-making authority, no employees, and no assets,” Defendants contend, CSI cannot show that it was injured by Defendants’ conduct. (Id.).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mayweather v. Guice

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 6, 2020

    See Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 322 (1976); Brown v. Braxton, 373 F.3d 501, 505-06 (4th Cir. 2004). … In Saucier v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Owen v. Goodwin

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 29, 2023

    Love-Lane v. … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Interface Security Systems, L.L.C. v. Family Dollar, Inc.

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jul 21, 2023

    Services”), which are interactive video security monitoring services that require specialized equipment, including but not limited to cameras, audio systems, DVRs and Digital Acoustics audio boards … Aug. 6, 2020) (quoting Legacy Data Access, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Satterthwaite v. Saul

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 15, 2022

    V. … In Lawrence v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Wright v. Lassiter

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 14, 2020

    McNeill v. Johnson, No. 3:18-CV-188-FDW, 2020 WL 534196, at *8 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 2020) (citing Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 484 (1995); Gaston v. … In Anderson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Winston Reed Investments L.L.C.

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 2, 2021

    Comm’n v. Int’l Fin. Servs., 323 F. … Rosenthal & Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Earls v. Forga Contracting, Inc.

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Mar 30, 2020

    For example, the Second Circuit in Herman found that a corporation’s chairman of the board could be held liable for violations of the FLSA along with the corporation he led because both qualified as “employers” under … Morris v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • TVL International, LLC v. Zhejiang Shenghui Lighting Co., Ltd.

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 4, 2022

    Coastal Roofing Co. v. P. Browne & Associates, 771 F. Supp. 2d 576, 585 (D.S.C. 2010) (quoting Wallace v. Buttar, 378 F.3d 182, 190 (2d Cir. 2004)). … Co. v. Mugridge, No. 5:09-cv-127-V, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150149, at *6 (W.D.N.C.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hill v. United States

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Dec 11, 2020

    Sexton v. French, 163 F.3d 874, 881 (4th Cir. 1998); Brown v. Artuz, 124 F.3d 73, 77-78 (2d Cir.1997). The Court instructed Petitioner as follows with regard to his right to testify at trial: THE COURT: … Mr. … See United States v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Call v. Polk

    454 F. Supp. 2d 475 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 22, 2006

    Jones, 398 F.3d 783 (6th Cir.2005); Mungo v. Duncan, 393 F.3d 327 (2d Cir.2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1002 , 125 S.Ct. 1936 , 161 L.Ed.2d 778 (2005); Brown v. … V.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Capiau v. Ascendum Machinery, Inc.

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 9, 2024

    See Miller v. Brown, 462 F.3d 312, 316 (4th Cir. 2006) (citing Lujan, 504 U.S. at 560–61). This is simply not a case where the controversy between the parties warrants issuance of a declaratory judgment. Volvo Constr. … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Nolan

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 1, 2026

    (citing Sweda v. … May 25, 2023) (dismissing co- fiduciary claim where the plaintiff alleged only that the “Board of Trustees knew of ‘each breach’ stemming from ‘maladministration resulting in plan losses’ and that they either knowingly

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.