Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncwd

1,784 results

1.45s

  • Ballard v. Hatley

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jun 10, 2020

    Appx. 231, 234 (4th Cir. 2016); French v. Warden, 442 F. App’x 845, 846 (4th Cir. 2011). In Anderson v. … Anderson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Corbett v. Perry

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 27, 2021

    Waybright v. … See Penley v. McDowell Cty.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Thomas S. Ex Rel. Brooks v. Flaherty

    699 F. Supp. 1178 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Nov 21, 1988

    Thomas v. Review Board, 450 U.S. 707, 716 , 101 S.Ct. 1425, 1431 , 67 L.Ed. 2d 624 (1981). The application of First Amendment principles to persons in institutions has been acknowledged in Olson, 561 F.Supp. 473 . … The Court relied heavily upon Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1 , 91 S.Ct. 1267 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971).

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Jones v. General Tire & Rubber Co.

    608 F. Supp. 1013 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Apr 25, 1985

    Wright v. … Board of Trustees of Pickens County School District A, 599 F.2d 582 (4th Cir.1979) mandatory non-renewal for pregnancy; Pennington v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rodriguez v. Wipro Limited

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 30, 2024

    (citing 18 U.S.C. § 1514A(b)(1)).2 If a final decision is issued, “OSHA’s order may be appealed to an administrative law judge, and then to DOL’s Administrative Review Board (“ARB”).” … Malin v. Siemens 2 The U.S. Supreme Court in Digital Realty Trust v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Perkins v. Berryhill

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jul 31, 2019

    Peace v. Berryhill, 2019 WL 2406626, at *1 (4th Cir. June 7, 2019) (quoting Brown v. Comm’r Soc. Sec. Admin., 873 F.3d 251, 267 (4th Cir. 2017)). … See Henderson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Griffin v. Hooks

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Nov 14, 2019

    Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 837 (1994). … Brown v. N.C. Dept. of Corrections, 612 F.3d 720, 723 (4th Cir. 2010).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Benham v. City of Charlotte

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Mar 16, 2021

    The arrests occurred under a Revised Joint Proclamation (“Proclamation”) issued by the Mecklenburg County Board of Commissioners and the Mayor of the City of Charlotte. Id. ¶ 8. … Civil Liberties Union v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brittain v. Lenovo (United States) Inc.

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 2, 2019

    See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986); Bouchat v. Baltimore Ravens Football Club, Inc., 346 F.3d 514, 522 (4th Cir. 2003). … See also Sparks v. Oxy-Health, LLC, 134 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rev Tech Labs, LLC, and Carolinas Fintech Ventures, LP v. Cirrus Secure, Inc., Frideswide Square, Inc., and David Brooks

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jul 2, 2026

    We CBD, LLC v. Planet Nine Priv. Air, LLC, No. 3:21-cv-00352, 2022 WL 2334984, at *4 (W.D.N.C. June 28, 2022). … See Hanback v. DRHI, Inc., 647 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Debty v. Saul

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 20, 2019

    (quoting Florida Power & Light v. Lorion, 470 U.S. 729, 744 (1985)); see Brown v. Colvin, 639 F. … See Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 390 (1971); Hays v. Sullivan, 907 F.2d 143, 1456 (4th Cir. 1990).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Trilogy Communications, Inc. v. Comm Scope Co.

    754 F. Supp. 468 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Mar 26, 1990

    At trial, two former • members of the Board of Patent Appeals, Mr. Witherspoon and Mr. … In Pennwalt Corp. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Flowers v. Electrolux North America, Inc.

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 8, 2022

    It happened after she came on board, and she discriminated against me because I’m Black. That’s the bottom line. … “It happened after [Rawat] came on board, and she discriminated against me because I’m Black. That’s the bottom line.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Billesdon v. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Apr 16, 2024

    See e.g., Mora v. … Dep’t of Corr. v. Gibson, 301 S.E.2d 78, 84 (N.C. 1983) (adopting the “evidentiary standards and principles of law” of Title VII for discrimination claims asserted pursuant to the NCEEPA); Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brenda Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 20, 2026

    Peace v. Berryhill, 2019 WL 2406626, at *1 (4th Cir. June 7, 2019) (quoting Brown v. Comm’r Soc. Sec. Admin., 873 F.3d 251, 267 (4th Cir. 2017)). … Id. at p. 13 (citing Russell v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Schaefer Systems International, Inc. v. Aloft Media, LLC

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jun 16, 2023

    Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. 117, 127 (2014) (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011). … In Renfinity Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Paskowitz v. Capitala Finance Corp.

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 15, 2019

    McGlinn (“McGlinn), the Company’s Chief Operating Officer, and Hunt Broyhill (“Broyhill”), a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. ¶23. … See, e.g.,Siracusano v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lockerby v. Cross Point NC Partners, LLC

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 1, 2023

    Co. v. Gen. Star Nat’l Ins. … See McKiver v. Murphy-Brown, 980 F.3d 937, 955 (4th Cir. 2020) (discussing the General Assembly’s intent regarding retroactivity).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Jahagirdar v. The Computer Haus NC, Inc.

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jul 14, 2023

    See, e.g., Wall v. Fruehauf Trailer Servs., Inc., 123 F. App'x 572, 580 (4th 4 Cir. 2005) (applying South Carolina law); O'Neal v. … . § 216(b); See also Calderon v. GEICO Gen. Ins. Co., 809 F.3d 111, 132 (4th Cir. 2015).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Tigner v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Oct 23, 2019

    gathering signatures of white colleagues who considered Plaintiff’s natural hairstyle to be unprofessional and inappropriate for the workplace. 1 Defendant states that the correct legal entity is Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board … Guessous v. Fairview Prop.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.