Case law

Brown v. Brannon

399 F. Supp. 133 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 28, 1975

Brown, Thomas Page, Spence Shannon, Fred McGill, and James Hogge, are owners and operators of their respective massage parlor businesses located within the City of Durham, Durham County, North Carolina. … In Steffel v.

Brown v. Flowers

297 F. Supp. 2d 846 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Dec 12, 2003

For example, in Ciena Corp. v. … Brown has not sufficiently alleged that he was an original owner of the songs in question, or that Mr. Flowers transferred any rights to him, Mr. Flowers’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. V.

Brown v. Cross

226 F.R.D. 526 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 18, 2004

Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m); Shao v. Link Cargo (Taiwan) Ltd,., 986 F.2d 700 , 708 (4th Cir.1993). … States v. Ziegler Bolt & Parts Co., 111 F.3d 878, 881 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (citations omitted).

Doby v. Brown

135 F. Supp. 584 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 4, 1955

Toucey v. New York Life Ins. Co., 314 U.S. 118 , 62 S.Ct. 139 , 86 L.Ed. 100 . The history of that delay is set forth in Brown v. Doby, 242 N.C. 462 , 87 S.E.2d 921 . … Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 ruled that segregation was discriminatory but it did not require a federal judge to become a substitute for local school boards.

Brown v. Langley

348 F. Supp. 2d 533 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 30, 2004

Harris v. Hutchinson, 209 F.3d 325, 330 (4th Cir.2000); see also Spencer v. Sutton, 239 F.3d 626 (4th Cir. *536 2001). … See Minter v. Beck, 230 F.3d 663 (4th Cir.2000) (federal habeas claim was time-barred when more than one year had elapsed from date of conviction until the petitioner filed his § 2254 petition).

Steele v. Brown

993 F. Supp. 918 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 21, 1998

See Nunnally v. MacCausland, 996 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.1993); Llewellyn v. Celanese Corp., 693 F.Supp. 369 (W.D.N.C.1988); and Moody v. Bayliner Marine Corp., 664 F.Supp. 232 (E.D.N.C.1987). … Compare Miller v. Runyon, 77 F.3d 189, 191-92 (7th Cir.)

Brown v. Henderson

155 F. Supp. 2d 502 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Dec 14, 2000

Board of Supervisors of L.S.U., 715 F.2d 971 (5th Cir.1983) (creating a three-factor test including whether the harassing act should trigger an employee’s awareness of and duty to assert her rights) with Morgan v. … Brown v. Perry 184 F.3d 388, 396 (4th Cir.1999). Defendant had such a policy.

Brown v. Finch

320 F. Supp. 660 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 21, 1969

Davis v. Gardner, 6 Cir., 395 F.2d 681 (1968); Daniel v. Gardner, 5 Cir., 390 F.2d 32 (1968). … In Thomas v.

United States v. Brown

893 F. Supp. 11 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 23, 1995

In light of United States v. … The Court continued: For example, in United States v.

Clark v. Cameron-Brown Co.

72 F.R.D. 48 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 30, 1976

Plaintiffs Guy V. Shaver and V. Carlton Kinney are the holders of 3200 and 200 warrants respectively of Cameron-Brown Investment Group and have intervened pursuant to an unopposed motion. … Clark, Executor, et al., v. Cameron-Brown Company, et al., Civil Action No.

Brown v. Sears Automotive Center

222 F. Supp. 2d 757 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jun 21, 2002

Goldberg v. B. … Shaffner v. Westinghouse Elec.

Brown v. Wells Fargo, N/A

463 B.R. 332 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 6, 2011

.”); City of Liberal v. … See, e.g., Ward v.

Brown v. Western Sky Financial, LLC

84 F. Supp. 3d 467 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 30, 2015

For example, Plaintiff Thomas Brown (“Brown”) obtained a loan for $2,600 from Western Sky. Western Sky retained $75, so Brown received $2,525 in the form of a loan. … Brown’s loan agreement (Id., Ex. 1, Thomas Brown Loan Agreement & Affida *472 vit (Doc. 89-1)) is the most recent and . contained different language.

Salley v. Board of Governors

136 F.R.D. 417 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Apr 22, 1991

Rivera v. M/T Fossarina, 840 F.2d 152, 155 (1st Cir.1988); Timmons v. … Cumberland Federal Sav. & Ln. v. Rangel, 1988 WL 116838 (N.D.Ill.1988).

Brown v. Institute for Family Centered Services, Inc.

394 F. Supp. 2d 724 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Apr 27, 2005

See, e.g., Harris v. … See Bryant v.

Liggett Group, Inc. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

748 F. Supp. 344 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 27, 1990

The jury found that Brown & Williamson was not liable to Liggett on the trademark and unfair competition claims. … See Newman v.

Liggett Group Inc. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

116 F.R.D. 205 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 10, 1986

See, O’Leary v. Purcell Co., 108 F.R.D. 641, 646 (M.D.N.C.1985); Rockland Industries, Inc. v. Frank Kasmir Associates, 470 F.Supp. 1176, 1181 (N.D.Tex.1979); W.R. Grace & Co. v. … In Duplan Corp. v.

Covington v. Montgomery County School Board

139 F. Supp. 161 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Apr 7, 1956

Board of Trustees of University of North Carolina, decided the 16th day of September, 1955, 134 F.Supp. 589, 592 , defended by the Attorney General of North Carolina, in connection with the opinion in Brown v. … If it is ultimately determined that they are, such acts cannot be defended on the ground that the State Constitution, or Statutes or orders of the State Board compel it, for the obvious reason that Brown v.

Allen v. State Board of Education

55 F.R.D. 350 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Apr 3, 1972

Flast v. Cohen, 392 U.S. 83 , 88 S.Ct. 1942 , 20 L.Ed.2d 947 (1968); Doremus v. Board of Education, 342 U.S. 429 , 72 S.Ct. 394 , 96 L. Ed. 475 (1952); Frothingham v. … See Oelrichs v. Spain, 82 U.S. 211 , 15 Wall. 211 , 21 L.Ed. 43 (1872); Maryland Casualty Co. v. United States, 108 F.2d 784 (4th Cir. 1940); Brewer, et al. v. Norfolk School Board, et al., 456 F.2d 943 (4th Cir. 1972).

Miller v. Northwest Region Library Board

348 F. Supp. 2d 563 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Dec 8, 2004

See Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 , 96 S.Ct. 893 , 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976); Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Kreimer, 958 F.2d 1242 ; Neinast v. Board of Trustees of the Columbus Metropolitan Library, 346 F.3d 585, 591 (6th Cir.2003); see also Armstrong v. District of Columbia Public Library, 154 F.Supp.2d 67, 75 (D.D.C.2001).