Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncmd

1,435 results

2.19s

  • Covington v. Edwards

    165 F. Supp. 957 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Sep 12, 1958

    v. … Elliott, D.C.E.D.S.C. 1955, 132 F.Supp. 776 ; Thompson v. County School Board of Arlington County, D.C.E.D.Va.1956, 144 F.Supp. 239 ; School Board of City of Newport News, Va. v. Atkins, 4 Cir., 1957, 246 F.2d 325 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Republican Party of North Carolina v. Martin

    682 F. Supp. 834 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 29, 1988

    In general, the county boards are. prohibited from acting “inconsistent with law or the rules established by the State Board of Elections.” N.C.Gen. Stat. § 163-33 (1987). The court finds Brown v. N.C. … Given the foregoing argument and the Brown precedent, the court will dismiss this case as to defendants Durham County Board of Elections, Forsyth County Board of Elections, and Guilford County Board of Elections.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Hole v. North Carolina Board of Elections

    112 F. Supp. 2d 475 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 17, 2000

    See also Eu v. … Plaintiff cites Hadley v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Greensboro v. Guilford County Board of Elections

    251 F. Supp. 3d 935 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Apr 3, 2017

    See, e.g., White v. Weiser, 412 U.S. 783, 790 , 93 S.Ct. 2348 , 37 L.Ed.2d 335 (1973). . See Bethune-Hill v. Va. State Bd. of Elections, — U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 788, 799 , 197 L.Ed.2d 85 (2017). . See Bethune-Hill v. Va. … See City of Greensboro v. Guilford Cty.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Frasier v. Board of Trustees of the University of North Carolina

    134 F. Supp. 589 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Sep 16, 1955

    It will have been noticed that the resolution of the Board of May 23, 1955, excluding Negroes from'the undergraduate schools of the University, was promulgated after the decision of the Supreme Court in Brown v. … The only answer to this far reaching decision, and the only defense on the merits of the eases offered by the defendants in this suit is that the Supreme Court in Brown v.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • City of Greensboro v. Guilford County Board of Elections

    120 F. Supp. 3d 479 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 23, 2015

    See, e.g., Martin v. … Redistricting In Reynolds v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Simkins v. City of Greensboro

    149 F. Supp. 562 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 20, 1957

    The City of Greensboro, before Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 , in an effort to comply with Plessy v. … The doctrine of Plessy v. Ferguson, supra, of equal but separate facility has been overruled in Brown v. Board of Education, supra. Before Brown v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Scott v. Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Board of Education

    317 F. Supp. 453 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jun 25, 1970

    School Board of New Kent County, 391 U.S. 430, 437 , 88 S.Ct. 1689 , 20 L.Ed. 2d 716 (1968). Then more recently, in Alexander v. … When the issues in this litigation, and in Allen (formerly Atkins) v. North Carolina State Board of Education, et al. (M.D.N.C.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • NAACP-Greensboro Branch v. Guilford County Board of Elections

    858 F. Supp. 2d 516 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 14, 2012

    In Daly v. … Miller v. Brown, 462 F.3d 312, 319 (4th Cir.2006) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Vickers v. Chapel Hill City Board of Education

    196 F. Supp. 97 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 4, 1961

    the defendant Board. 11. … In making this argument, the defendant relies principally upon Holt v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • PIPPEN v. BROWN SLAUGHTER

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Apr 30, 2020

    LAVERNE ) BROWN HARRISON; EVELYN DELAINE ) BROWN JONES; MARCIA LATANZA ) BROWN; D. … See Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ritholz v. North Carolina State Board of Examiners in Optometry

    18 F. Supp. 409 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 5, 1937

    Bank v. Stevens, 169 U.S. 432, 461 , 18 S.Ct. 403 , 42 L.Ed. 807 ; In re Chetwood, 165 U.S. 443, 460 , 17 S.Ct. 385 , 41 L.Ed. 782 ; Dial v. Reynolds, 96 U.S. 340 , 24 L.Ed. 644 ; Haines v. … Co. v. Board of Public Works (D.C.) 17 F.Supp. 170, 176 . As was well said by Judge Wallace in Furnald v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • McCoy v. Greensboro City Board of Education

    179 F. Supp. 745 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 14, 1960

    Briggs v. Elliott, D.C.E. D.S.C.1955, 132 F.Supp. 776 ; Thompson v. County School Board of Arlington County, D.C.E.D.Va.1956, 144 F.Supp. 239 ; School Board of City of Newport News, Va. v. … Brown v. Board of Education, 1954, 347 U.S. 483, 484 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 ; Brown v. Board of Education, 1955, 349 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 ;

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cockerham Ex Rel. Cockerham v. Stokes County Board of Education

    302 F. Supp. 2d 490 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Feb 3, 2004

    But see Brown v. … Seamons v. Snow, 84 F.3d 1226, 1232 (10th Cir.1996); Brown v. Hot. Sexy & Safer Prods., Inc., 68 F.3d 525, 540 (1st Cir.1995); Jennings v. University of *497 N.C. at Chapel Hill, 240 F.Supp.2d 492 , 509 (M.D.N.C.2002).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Eberhart v. Gettys

    215 F. Supp. 2d 666 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 11, 2002

    Smith then advised Brown of an opportunity to present her concerns to the Spencer Board of Aldermen (“Board”) meeting on December 12, 2000. … Brown v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • BROWN v. ALLTRAN FINANCIAL, LP

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Feb 8, 2022

    See Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 561 (1992); Bryant v. Woodall, 1 F.4th 280, 285 (4th Cir. 2021). … Brown has standing. See Docs. 22, 23. The parties cannot avoid the requirements of standing through consent, see Constantine v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Tartan Marine Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    446 F. Supp. 1174 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 24, 1978

    In Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Co., 415 U.S. 1 , 94 S.Ct. 1028 , 39 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974), the government contended that § 552(a)(4)(B) provided the sole and exclusive injunctive remedy available in a FOIA case. … See Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. NLRB, supra; Committee on Masonic Homes, etc. v. NLRB, 414 F.Supp. 426 (D.C. Pa.1976); Roger J. Au & Son, Inc. v. NLRB, 405 F.Supp. 1200 (W.D.Pa.1976). Contra St. Elizabeth’s Hospital v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • R. J. Reynolds Employees Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board

    61 F. Supp. 280 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 16, 1943

    authorized and empowered by the Board, through its duly authorized representative, the Board’s Regional Director, to supervise the election of the employees of the R. … , in the proceeding pending before the Board, designated as Case No. 5-R-1356, and served copies thereof on the CIO and the Regional Director of the Board and the R.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Cone Ex Rel. Cone v. Randolph County Schools Board of Education

    657 F. Supp. 2d 667 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Sep 22, 2009

    Bd. of Henrico County, Va. v. Z.P., 399 F.3d 298, 307 (4th Cir.2005) (“To give deference only to the decision of the School Board would render meaningless the entire process of administrative review.”). … C.G. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Jeffers v. Whitley

    165 F. Supp. 951 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Sep 12, 1958

    In passing, it might be well to note that the North Carolina Supreme Court, in Constantian v. Anson County, supra, acknowledges that the decisions of the Supreme Court in Brown v. … Board of Education of Topeka, 1954, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 , and Brown v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.