Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncmd

1,435 results

0.98s

  • Westfield Insurance v. Nautilus Insurance

    154 F. Supp. 3d 259 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 7, 2016

    Co., 137 N.C.App. 1, 5 , 527 S.E.2d 328, 331 (2000) (explaining that “an insurer’s duty to defend an action brought against its insured ,is determined by the language in the policy”); Brown v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. … Bend Co. v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • United States v. Ferguson

    667 F. Supp. 2d 567 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Oct 15, 2009

    See United States v. … Brown, 460 U.S. 730 , 103 S.Ct. 1535 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983)). 6 In the end, Ferguson’s argument rests on his claim to ownership in the items seized — the firearm and all the ammunition.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Hayes

    633 F. Supp. 1183 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Apr 25, 1986

    Marcus v. … Acko v. Brown, 489 F.Supp. 216 (D.Minn.1980); see also Jackson v. Allen, 553 F.Supp. 528 (D.Mass.1982).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • United States v. Container Corporation of America

    273 F. Supp. 18 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 31, 1967

    V Obtaining Price Information 29. … In the trade, these charges were various called, among other things, an “area charge,” “base,” “base price,” “board base price,” “board factor,” “multiplier,” “level” and “board level.” 49.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Basic MacHinery Co., Inc. v. Ketom Const., Inc.

    686 F. Supp. 542 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jun 29, 1988

    Owen Equipment and Erection Co. v. Kroger, 437 U.S. 365 , 98 S.Ct. 2396 , 57 L.Ed.2d 274 (1978). … See, e.g., Morse/Diesel, Inc. v. Trinity Industries, Inc., 655 F.Supp. 346 (S.D.N.Y.1987); Brown and Caldwell v. Institute for Energy Funding, Ltd., 617 F.Supp. 649 (D.C.Cal.1985).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • King v. Richardson

    46 F. Supp. 510 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 20, 1942

    Woodcock v. … The board of deacons and elders authorized and directed the trustees to convey their interest in consideration of $45,000.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Broadus v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

    101 F. Supp. 3d 554 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Apr 28, 2015

    When Broadus went to board her Delta flight from Atlanta to Pensacola, a Delta employee assisted her, but did so negligently, resulting in injuries to Broa-dus’ knees and back. (Id. ¶¶ 5-7.) … Per this arrangement, Delta made in-person contact with Broa-dus when she boarded Delta’s plane in Greensboro.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Rouse v. Duke University

    914 F. Supp. 2d 717 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Dec 21, 2012

    There does not appear to have been a formal Greek Judicial Board investigation of Phi Beta Sigma, and the Board did not sanction any fraternities or students. … See Briggs v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Warner v. Gulf Oil Corp.

    178 F. Supp. 481 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 20, 1959

    It is assumed by plaintiff that the voluntary nonsuit of the former action by the defendant establishes want of probable cause or at least is prima facie evidence of probable cause, relying on Brown v. … Mann v. Becker, 90 Wash. 534 , 156 P. 396 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Laughter v. Aventis Pasteur, Inc.

    291 F. Supp. 2d 406 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 12, 2003

    Vaughn v. Clarkson, 324 N.C. 108, 109-10 , 376 S.E.2d 236, 236-37 (1989) (per curiam). In fact, the North Carolina Supreme Court in Vaughn stated the following: In Nicholson v. … See Brown v. Lyons, 93 N.C.App. 453, 458 , 378 *413 S.E.2d 243, 246 (1989) (citing Flippin v. Jarrell, 301 N.C. 108, 120 , 270 S.E.2d 482, 490 (1980)).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • DiPaulo v. Potter

    733 F. Supp. 2d 666 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 23, 2010

    Long v. Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc., 9 F.3d 340, 343 (4th Cir.1993) (citing Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 832 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976)). … Steele v. Brown, 993 F.Supp. 918, 921-22 (M.D.N.C.1998) (Title VII) (citing Irwin v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, 498 U.S. 89, 96 , 111 S.Ct. 453 , 112 L.Ed.2d 435 (1990) (heavy burden) & Cada v.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • ALLEN v. CAMPBELL

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Dec 19, 2019

    Todd v. … Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Nicholson v. Western Electric Co.

    555 F. Supp. 3 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 23, 1982

    In Wright v. … Board of Trustees v. Sweeney, 439 U.S. 24 , 99 S.Ct. 295 , 58 L.Ed.2d 216 (1978).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Perkins v. Town of Princeville

    340 F. Supp. 2d 624 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Sep 27, 2004

    See Harding v. … Brown v. Flowers, 297 F.Supp.2d 846, 850 (M.D.N.C.2003); *628 accord Plant Genetic Sys., 933 F.Supp. at 527 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • SISK v. LASSITER

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 12, 2021

    Grande (“Grande”), Executive Director of the North Carolina Department of Public Safety’s Inmate Grievance Resolution Board (“IGRB”). (Kimberly D. Grande Declaration ¶ 3, Docket Entry 34-2.) … CONCLUSION Based upon the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Defendants Catherine Brown and James Horteshell’s motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry 31) be

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Schwiesow v. Winston Furniture Co., Inc.

    74 F. Supp. 2d 544 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 22, 1999

    See Stuessy v. … Watts, 488 F.Supp. at 1236 (citing Smith v. Sperling, 354 U.S. 91 , 77 S.Ct. 1112 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1205 (1957); Sanders v. Hiser, 479 F.2d 71, 73 (8th Cir.1973); Zunamon v. Brown, 418 F.2d 883 (8th Cir.1969)).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • BONE EL v. SOLOMON

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 6, 2020

    (Id.; see also Brown Decl. ¶ 9.) Ms. Brown states that the approved items for MSTA worship are related to the basic tenets of that faith’s religious beliefs. (Brown Decl. ¶ 10.) … Krieger v. Brown, 496 F.App’x. 322, 324 (4th Cir. 2012). RLUIPA and First Amendment claims proceed in two stages, both of which require a showing of a substantial burden on the religious exercise. See Wright v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • WINECOFF v. French

    348 F. Supp. 2d 531 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 30, 2004

    See Hernandez v. … . § 2244 (d)(1)); Brown v. Angelone, 150 F.3d 370 (4th Cir.1998) .(petitioner whose conviction became final on direct review before enactment of the AEDPA had one year after enactment to file federal habeas petition).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Greensboro Professional Baseball Club, Inc. v. Southern League of Professional Baseball Clubs, Inc.

    681 F. Supp. 1104 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 9, 1988

    See Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 , 58 S.Ct. 817 , 82 L.Ed. 1188 (1938); Restatement (Second) of Conflicts of Laws § 302(2) (1971). In Medical Society of Mobile County v. … Jaquith Co. v. Island Creek Coal Co., 88 N.J.Super. 244 , 211 A.2d 812 (1965).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Gardner

    251 F. Supp. 262 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 4, 1966

    In Thomas v. … Heath et al v. Celebrezze, 372 U.S. 945 , 83 S.Ct. 938 , 9 L.Ed.2d 970 (1963; Celebrezze v. Bolas, 8 Cir., 316 F.2d 498, 500 (1963); Rodriguez v. Celebrezze, 1 Cir., 349 F.2d 494 ; DeGracia v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.