Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,435 results
1.54s
Students for Fair Admissions Inc. v. University of North Carolina
319 F.R.D. 490 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 13, 2017
(“SFFA”), initiated this action against Defendants, the University of North Carolina and members of its board of governors, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and members of its board of trustees and various … The parties agreed to a Joint Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal as to all claims involving UNC-Chapel Hill Board of Trustees. (ECF No. 29 ¶¶ 1, 2.) .
Cited 4 timesPublished328 F. Supp. 842 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jun 21, 1971
The majority relies upon Dombrowski v. Pfister, 380 U.S. 479 , 85 S.Ct. 1116 , 14 L.Ed.2d 22 (1965), and Carroll v. … V.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · Oct 27, 2025
See Abbott Realty Co. v. … Just Puppies, Inc. v. Brown, 123 F.4th 652, 660 (4th Cir. 2024) (cleaned up).
Cited 0 timesUnknownSouthern Film Extruders, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.
117 F.R.D. 559 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Oct 23, 1987
Corp. v. Riverview Narrow Fabrics, Inc., 117 F.R.D. 83 (M.D.N.C.1987). … Corp. v. Riverview Narrow Fabrics, Inc., 117 F.R.D. 83 (M.D.N.C.1987).
Cited 8 timesPublished178 F. Supp. 2d 594 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Dec 4, 2001
Page v. Bolger, 645 F.2d 227, 233 (4th Cir.1981); see also, Brown v. … See Sloop v. Memorial Mission Hosp., Inc., 198 F.3d 147 (4th Cir.1999), Edelman v. Lynchburg College, 228 F.3d 503 (4th Cir.2000).
Cited 2 timesPublishedGarrett v. R. J. Reynolds Industries, Inc.
81 F.R.D. 25 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Dec 27, 1978
“accords . . . with the recent Supreme Court Decision in East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. Rodriguez, which may sound the death knell for ‘across-the-board’ suits in discrimination cases. … The Court again stresses that allegations of across-the-board discrimination are insufficient to certify a broad class. See Shelton v. Pargo, Inc., 582 F.2d 1298 , 1312 (4th Cir. 1978). See also Belcher v.
Cited 6 timesPublished899 F. Supp. 1439 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 13, 1995
Louis v. Praprotnik, 485 U.S. 112 , 108 S.Ct. 915 , 99 L.Ed.2d 107 (1988); Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469, 478-479 , 106 S.Ct. 1292, 1297-1298 , 89 L.Ed.2d 452 (1986). … In Shannon v.
Cited 7 timesPublished395 F. Supp. 294 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Apr 23, 1975
See Glaser, supra, at 557 ; Sims v. Board of Educ., 329 F.Supp. 678, 685 (D.N.Mex.1971); Ware v. Estes, 328 F.Supp. 657, 659 (N.D.Tex.1971). … See generally Goss v. Lopez, supra, 419 U.S. at 574, 92 S.Ct. 729 ; Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 570-71 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Sniadach v.
Cited 18 timesPublished388 F. Supp. 3d 593 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 1, 2019
Id. at 438-39 , 116 S.Ct. 2211 ; *622 Konkel v. Bob Evans Farms Inc. , 165 F.3d 275 , 280 (4th Cir. 1999) ; see also Browning-Ferris Indus. of Vt., Inc. v. … See, e.g., Roberts v. Locke , 821 S.E.2d 903 (table), 2018 WL 6614066 , at *6-7 (N.C. Ct. App. Dec. 18, 2018) ; Brown v. Cox , 809 S.E.2d 923 (table), 2018 WL 944412 , at *3-4 (N.C. Ct. App.
Cited 20 timesPublishedGobble v. International Paper Co.
207 F. Supp. 2d 423 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 22, 2002
In Johnson v. … See, e.g., Braxton v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSWINNEY v. FRONTIER AIRLINES, INC.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 9, 2020
Brown, 716 F.3d 342, 350 (4th Cir. 2013). B. … Wilson v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 525 F.3d 370, 376 (4th Cir. 2008). III.
Cited 0 timesUnknown233 F. Supp. 2d 739 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 25, 2002
Boone v. Goldin, 178 F.3d 253, 256 (4th Cir.1999); see also Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 456-57 (D.C.Cir.1999). … v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedUnited States v. Any & All Assets of that Certain Business Known As Shane Co.
147 F.R.D. 99 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 24, 1992
Board of Gov. of Federal Reserve Sys. v. Pharaon, 140 F.R.D. 642 (S.D.N.Y. 1991). The public has an interest in law enforcement which may, under proper circumstances, be given priority over concurrent civil proceedings. … Board of Gov. of Federal Reserve Sys. v. Pharaon, supra.
Cited 7 timesPublishedCLEMONS v. THE CITY OF GREENSBORO
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 19, 2022
United States v. Brown, 701 F.3d 120, 126 (4th Cir. 2012) (quoting Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 357 (1967)); see Coolidge v. … (quoting Mincey v. Arizona, 437 U.S. 385, 393–394 (1978)). The imminent destruction of evidence constitutes an exigent circumstance. Brown, 701 F.3d at 126; see United States v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown367 F. Supp. 2d 861 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Feb 28, 2005
See Collin v. … See Roper v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedAllen v. Tyco Electronics Corp.
294 F. Supp. 2d 768 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Dec 2, 2003
Campbell v. … Mary’s Honor Ctr. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished355 F. Supp. 2d 817 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 25, 2005
Revene v. Charles County Comm’rs, 882 F.2d 870 , 872 (4th Cir.1989). … Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(e); Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 148 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 n. 1 (1984); Nguyen, 187 F.3d 630 , 1999 WL 556446 , at *3.
Cited 1 timesPublishedFederal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Quicksilver LLC
155 F. Supp. 3d 535 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Dec 10, 2015
Am., Inc. v. … He was an employee of the company as well as a common shareholder and a member of the board of directors. Id. At one point, the board of directors began exploring opportunities to sell the company. Id.
Cited 54 timesPublishedAmerican Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Simmons
153 F. Supp. 658 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 28, 1957
Liverman v. Cline, 212 N.C. 43 , 192 S.E. 849 ; Shapiro v. City of Winston-Salem, 212 N.C. 751 , 194 S.E. 479 ; Brown v. Bottoms Truck Lines, 227 N.C. 299 , 42 S.E. 2d 71 ; Wood v. … Bank of French Broad, Inc., v. Bryan, 240 N.C. 610 , 83 S.E.2d 485 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 20, 2021
Officers Brown and Breeden approached Plaintiff’s cell, at which time he was immediately subject to a strip search, and thereafter he stood to the left of Officer Breeden outside the cell in flex cuffs while Officer Brown … Plaintiff again appealed, and on February 13, 2019, received a response from the grievance resolution board dismissing the grievance. (Id. at 27, 39.)
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna